Recurly vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recurly | Score8.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Recurly is a subscription billing platform and manages customer communications via email, business performance monitoring, and account changes. A merchant bank account is required to work with Recurly. A payment gateway is part of the product but it integrates with other gateways, such as PayPal, to give shoppers a more comprehensive suite of payment options. | N/A |
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 16 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
88% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
89% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | WooCommerce Subscriptions Score8.7 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Chargebee Score8.5 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Zuora Score8.5 out of 10 | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Recurly | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Recurly Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |














