Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
sr. CSA in Customer Service at rackspace (5001-10,000 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
At RackSpace, we use Atlassian Confluence for our knowledge article sharing, or you can say knowledge book. We use it on daily basis to update the new process and change which is being implemented every now and then so as to speak we find this tool very useful for maintaining the document for sharing knowledge at one place.
Pros
Corporate workspace for sharing knowledge within organisation
Real time collaboration
Integration
Workspace for different teams
Cons
Fix hierarchy or structure
Use naming conventions
Need standard template
So many features but not being used by wider audience
Return on Investment
Previously, we were using other software, not gonna name it. However it has great benefit over a long period
ROI is looking for short-term nothing, however, for long-term. It is time saving. As it take less time creating docs
Instant access to SOP and KBs
Improved collaboration
Better alignment with JIRA for those using it
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian Jira, Notion, Microsoft SharePoint and ClickUp
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Global Revenue Enablement Manager in Sales at Proximus Global (1001-5000 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Atlassian Confluence is used pretty piecemeal at my organization. Many of the more technical teams store all of their processes, policies, and even some code in Atlassian Confluence and use Jira for project management as well. On the other hand, less technical teams use other programs that are more tailored to their niche (i.e. Customer Success, People, Finance).
Pros
Space organization
Permissions management
Document collaboration
Cons
Browser extension for quicker access to content
Live collaboration
Return on Investment
Efficient to use in conjunction with Jira
Needed to be replaced for Sales/Marketing/CS teams because of tedious nature of updating and finding content
We now have somewhat redundant programs because of needs not met by Atlassian Confluence (i.e. embedded content in Salesforce)
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Coda, Microsoft SharePoint, Spekit, Highspot and Asana
Other Software Used
Microsoft Planner, LinkedIn Learning (Lynda.com), Motivosity, Seismic Learning, WorkRamp, Microsoft Project
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology (201-500 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Our org uses Atlassian Confluence for document storage and company wide announcements. We used to have only some teams on Atlassian Confluence but found that this tool is much better than others on the market so decided to move the entire org over about a year ago. Since then, we have upgraded to the premium version as well and integrated Smart courses along with it. So far it's been good for having 1 centralized place to store all of the company's items. We are also looking into opening the space up for external guest use as well as we are a SaaS organization.
Pros
Able to integrate with JSM
Can customize user permissions
Is able to allow guest access without exposing other spaces within our org
Cons
Integrations with Atlassian Confluence can sometimes be slow, such as Smart Courses
Limited formating structuring
Limited customizations
Return on Investment
Saved us about $20k usd a year as we migrated from Simpplr to Atlassian Confluence for company wide document collaboration storage
Saved us about another $6k usd a year from migration one of our teams from Notion to this
Able to not have to purchase extra platforms for allowing guest access such as onboarding clients
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Employee in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We are using Atlassian Confluence for maintaining documentation across all the projects in our organization. Every project has documentation created in Atlassian Confluence which follows a hierarchical structure. Any additional information can be uploaded in the form of attachments. Atlassian Confluence is very easy to use for all people including business team, developers, testers, support to name a few.
Pros
Project based hierarchical documentation
Include related links and attachments
Support for various snippets ensuring creation of good quality documentation
Vast number of macros
Cons
Storage limit is very low for free plan
Searching can be better (common words are ignored in search)
PDF export quality can be improved
Compatibility issues with other software
Return on Investment
Project and resource management has improved using Atlassian Confluence
Page restriction is easy to implement based on users/groups
Good support for external links and content formatting
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Manager in Marketing (10,001+ employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I am using Atlassian Confluence for our shared technical team knowledge space and supporting projects with relevant documents in an organized way. It helps address problems of supporting internal knowledge transfer and supporting the intake and development of business initiatives.
Pros
Knowledge management. Storage and maintenance of documents in a shared secure space.
Permissions management. Controlling permissions and access of internal users who need custom access.
Help and support. Supporting onboarding new users and visual guidance of how to use the tool.
Cons
Interface customization. Building a custom interface and custom menu options would help for some of our teams looking for custom modules to use within the tool.
Supporting multi lingual. Allowing for multiple languages to be used in the same workspace would help support global users.
Tool integrations. Integrating directly with other visualization tools has been challenging and doesn't work smoothly from the get go.
Return on Investment
Positive impact on folder management. This helps to separate and organize documents within a workspace that multiple teams are sharing, and has helped to streamline the internal process.
Positive impact on task management. Aligns very well with how we manage projects and allows our team to collaborate and updates notes on tasks.
Positive impact on vendor collaboration. It has suited our needs on collaborating and sharing documents with external vendors, which has helped us consolidate our tools and manage internal costs.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Asana
Other Software Used
Asana
Confluence Alternatives
Products similar to Confluence that may also meet your needs.