Atlassian Confluence the good and bad
March 03, 2025
Atlassian Confluence the good and bad

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Atlassian Confluence
We use Atlassian Confluence as a repository of information that needs to be organized and and kept around for a longer time. It allows use to document teams, products, and processes in ways that allow use to keep things organized. In my opinion, there are certainly painful limitations, but at the same time it also serves a critical function.
Pros
- repository of processes grouped by product, team, or program
- Gives individual teams a place to hold their relevant documentation
- makes it easier to establish the level at which a document should live
Cons
- Search function is usually not very helpful
- Search is to highly based on how recently updated documents are and not by relevance
- the functionality around tables is quite limited, lacking ability to freeze rows or columns
- allows us to document specific processes for trouble shooting
- helps facilitate quicker responses to an issue with relevant process
- quicker to find the relevant people on a team based on the team's page
Atlassian Confluence is better suited for documenting and acting as a repository for information than the more immediate what is currently being worked on things that are better suited for in Jira. In my opinion, Atlassian Confluence certainly has it's short comings but it is the best option we have for documentation repository that we are aware of.
Do you think Atlassian Confluence delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Atlassian Confluence's feature set?
Yes
Did Atlassian Confluence live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Atlassian Confluence go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Atlassian Confluence again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation