Ideal for collaborative teamwork. I would add more design features to make it a 10.
August 26, 2022

Ideal for collaborative teamwork. I would add more design features to make it a 10.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Miro is used at various stages of work. Fundamentally to visualize research information and make an understanding of the products and content proposals. The inconvenience that Miro represents is that it is difficult to materialize the sketches of the proposal. Lack of design elements to be able to fully track projects in Miro. (*Text written in Spanish and translated into English by a translator).

Pros

  • Team work.
  • Research sessions.
  • Content proposals.

Cons

  • Text editing.
  • Elements of design.
  • Structures to design.
  • GROUP PRODUCTIVITY.
  • Dynamic work.
  • Collective construction.
  • All information in the same place.
It is a great tool for dynamic teamwork. It allows working collaboratively synchronously, and asynchronously.
It is simple to use. To improve, I would add descriptions when hovering over certain icons for greater accessibility.
The impact is very positive. It facilitates interaction and collective creation between the different areas involved in a project.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Miro is a product that adapts more easily between different areas. It's easy and intuitive for all teams.
As I mentioned at the beginning, Miro adapts very well to comprehensive project monitoring and teamwork. It serves as a general board to capture the different stages of a process, from research and understanding of the product to final proposals and feedback. It is also useful for group work dynamics because it allows us to build together. However, it lacks elements that make it easier to make designs in low. Many content proposals need schemes that allow them to be viewed in specific scenarios such as web pages, networks, etc. Nowadays, we do this with manual forms like boxes, squares, and others. It would make it so much easier to have default elements.

Using Miro

Es simple de usar pero se podrían mejorar las etiquetas para mayor accesibilidad, sobre todo para los iconos.

Comments

More Reviews of Miro