Item: Miro
Rating: 10
Author: Sune Raubenheimer

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As an architectural practice we use it as a collaboration tool especially to assist with remote working. We find it replaces the need to sit around a physical table when brainstorming and communicating ideas within our team. We can quickly sketch out ideas as well as discuss project planning and timelines all within one platform.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Sketch mark ups
Board managment
Interactive tool types / templates
Inviting guests

Cons

Boards get heavy quickly
Tools can be a bit confusing

Return on Investment

Improved productivity
Improved planning capabilities
Quicker feedback loops

Implementation Rating

None, it was seamless. We migrated from InVision with no problems

Ease of Integration

I would like ClickUp integration

Collaboration

Very positivly. Our team is fully remote and use Miro daily to assist with calls and discussiong solutions to various problems

Alternatives Considered

Freehand by InVision

Miro has more functionality and handles imports better than InVision. The board organisation is also better.
Guest access is also easier

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Other Software Used

ClickUp, Microsoft Teams, Revit

Likelihood to Recommend

It is well suited to brainstorming ideas, project planning and marking up images / drawings.
It is less appropriate for use on the ipad as the boards get heavy quickly.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Miro as Architectural tool