Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
Wrike is being used for Marketing Project Management, with both external agencies and internal users from departments across the organization including media, partnerships, and operations with plans to expand to additional departments. It allows us to plan projects, share files and collaborate in the same space for efficiency and accuracy of information while ensuring projects are delivered on-time.
- Multiple ways to view your project, including lists, boards, gantt, tables, etc.
- Request Form functionality to auto-generate either 1 Task or an entire project from a blueprint/template.
- Thumbnail images of PDF's, similar to PNG/JPG files.
- Sub-task functionality with dashboard displays.
- Improved on-time delivery of projects.
- Improved quality of deliverables.
Basecamp feels like the '90s compared to Wrike. Basecamp has no customizable dashboards or reports to roll-up data, no resource forecasting tools, lacks file management, and has limitations on how you can view your project (i.e. only ListView). Wrike's ability to sort and filter tasks is spot-on, with a robust search feature to quickly find what you're looking for - at both the task and project level.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
No
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes