From Zero to Wrike!
Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
We use Wrike for all internal projects that Senior Management is sponsoring. Before Wrike, there was no project management system to help store information in one place, track progress, and provide visual data. Wrike is currently being used by the PMO and we are moving to have each department use for their own department project. When we are ready, we will start venturing out to other integrations to better the automations for our users.
Pros
- Track project/task progress
- Provide visual charts/data
- Ability to setup automations to help streamline processes
Cons
- Saving forms when they are not ready to submit
- Task naming - It can be difficult to identify where that task lives in the my task view when it's under a milestone or if it's a subtask.
- We have been able to use Wrike to prioritize tasks for departments. Some departments are overwhelmed with other tasks and being able to save the staff some time by prioritizing their tasks has been helpful.
- Collaboration and communication have improved between the project teams.
- Wrike made it easier to access past information to reference for future preparation or to help clarify.
We have not used these features yet but plan to use them.
- Workamajig and Asana
Wrike has more automation features and custom usability that allows for flexibility. The workspaces are cohesive and are easier to navigate.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation