Wrike is worth it if you take the time to learn its best features
Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
My team uses Wrike for project and task management. We use it for planning, scheduling, coordination, reviews, approvals, and as a pseudo-archive of assets (mostly as a historical backup—all final assets are loaded into our DAM). Wrike helps keep our team oriented. It helps us be on the same page and working toward the same goal.
Pros
- Project Management
- Asset Review and Approval
- Time Management and Scheduling
Cons
- Display of certain kinds of documents in the reviewer is glitchy
- I wish I had the ability to define personal workflows in my personal space that weren't account-based
- I wish there was some time stamping feature inside task and project descriptions that wasn't solely based on the commenting function. It's easy to lose things in the comments
- Software consolidation has led to cost savings
- Streamlined workflows have saved labor costs
- We get more out of each employee
I haven't used the AI features.
Wrike has better options for in-task review and approval than anything I've used in the past. The available customization for dashboards and reports is powerful and useful. It's easy to use Wrike at a low level—taking the time to learn its specialized and more powerful features makes it the best PM app I've encountered.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation