Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (DTM) was a tool used by marketers to manage tags, and for collecting and distributing data across digital marketing systems. Adobe DTM is a legacy, and it will not receive feature updates. Adobe invites users to upgrade to Launch on the Adobe Experience Platform.
N/A
VWO
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
VWO is an A/B testing and conversion optimization platform that enables growing businesses to conduct qualitative and quantitative visitor research, build an experimentation roadmap and run continuous experiments on their digital properties. With its 5 capabilities Plan, Track, Test, Analyze, and Target, it brings the entire CRO (conversion rate optimization) process at one place. VWO helps online businesses follow the process- and data-driven conversion…
$49
per month
Pricing
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
VWO
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$99.00
per month
TESTING
Get a Demo
The classic VWO A/B testing solution
CONVERSION OPTIMIZATION
Get a Demo
The all-in-one platform for all your optimization needs
ENTERPRISE
Get a Demo
Customized solution with advanced AB testing and conversion optimization capabilities
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
VWO
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
VWO
Features
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
VWO
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
10.0
5 Ratings
20% above category average
VWO
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
9.4
5 Ratings
15% above category average
VWO
-
Ratings
Tag library
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page load times
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
VWO
-
Ratings
Event tracking
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile event tracking
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data distribution management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Universal data layer
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated error checking
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
VWO
7.5
11 Ratings
11% below category average
a/b experiment testing
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Split URL testing
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Multivariate testing
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Test significance
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Advanced code editor
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Visitor recordings
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Preview mode
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Test duration calculator
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
VWO
8.2
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
If you're on the Adobe stack at all, you absolutely need DTM. It will make your life infinitely easier. It's so simple to update your Adobe Analytics code and have version control, and when we implemented Adobe Target, it took literally less than 15 minutes for me to do. I also think it's significantly simpler than Google Tag Manager. I went through all manner of difficulty when implementing tags on that and have not had similar problems on DTM. If you're frequently placing pixels, it's a great tool that will speed their deployment. The only situation in which I think a tag manager is not appropriate is if you have a dev with too much time on their hands. Otherwise, get a TMS and get DTM.
It works better for either small or big companies because small companies can start with the free plan which is very decent and has everything they need. Also for big companies who get the best paid plans they get a lot of premium functionalities, the insight module, outstanding reports. But for medium size companies who can only afford the basic paid plan, it may not be the best tool as it is very limited. For example, they cannot analize a/b tests for new and ruturning visitors, neither based on the users device category.
It is a rules based tag management system that allows the application of tracking pixels much easier than hard coding.
By placing 2 pieces of code on the top and bottom of each page of a website, we can create rules that track certain events and relay the information back to Adobe Media Optimizer and Google analytics.
It has simplified the coding process so one doesn't have to generate tons of gory javascript to deploy on each individual page to get tracking.
VWO is pretty easy to implement on websites and doesn't require a heavy technology lift
The VWO interface is pretty intuitive and let's non-technical users make variants for testing
The VWO reporting dashboard is excellent for determining statistical significance and understanding whether differences in conversion rates are meaningful or not
The user interface within VWO does take a bit of time to get used to, especially as it pertains to switching back and forth between tests. When running multiple experiments on a site at a time, a clear and succinct dashboard for everything in one place would be helpful (as opposed to needing to switch between A/B, multivariate, etc).
It's great value and we think we've ironed out all the major teething troubles. However, if we experience any more bugs or problems that significantly slow us down then we're seriously considering switching to Optimizely, which I haven't personally tested but have heard great things about from my CRO peers
I gave Visual Website Optimizer a rating of 8 because it is overall a great product to use. Setting up and keeping track of various tests is easy and straight forward. The only reason why this product is not rated higher is because the support documents online leave a lot of room for improvement.
VWO doesn't appear to slow down our website at all, though some customers with adblockers like UBlock Origin have been known to not see entire pages if VWO is making changes to the page at a macro level (background, font, etc). This is rare though.
Although it is a newer product to Adobe, they seem to truly care about our challenges and are very proactive in making sure that we have the most knowledgeable support available in a timely manner.
While their online document support is lacking a simple email to their support team will almost always get responded to the next day. It has however taken more than one email to explain the problem to the support team till they understood the problem. The solution I was given also only half fixed the problem the rest I figured out on my own.
Training was good, just limited to the onboarding process. They walked through all of the steps it takes to get started in VWO and each of the modules, along with giving us ideas for starting our first test. I feel like it could be better if there was a guided process within the VWO program to continue to educate you along the way, and a way to turn that off for experienced users.
Overall, the implementation of VWO is straightforward. If you've got a straightforward way of deploying code to all of your test pages, either a good CMS or a TMS, then implementation should be a breeze. There is no tweaking to be done to the code itself, and once deployed it has the flexibility to cope with different VWO modules (tracking, conversion analysis, session analysis) without modification.
Adobe DTM provides a more secure data analytics solution. It is customized and best used on large scale deployments of websites with pages 10,000+. The Adobe Analytics tool, once learned, is very easy to use and provides more robust, customized graphics and ability to export data to "securely" via FTP from the cloud to SQL database.
There are significant differences in each platform when it comes to Optimizely and vwo. From a functionality and performance perspective they each have their pros and cons. It is important to go through the feature sets of each and ensure the solution you select will work specifically with your business objectives and conversion rate optimization goals
The product seems infinitely scalable for our needs (small business) and we've never had any issue with loading VWO-edited elements. I will say, though, that online customers with ad blockers have been known to not see certain VWO elements as their third-party scripts are disabled.
The key factor is that my devs are not tied up with petty things like adding JS or advertising pixels. Simple work like that can be handled by me while they work on feature development.
Release cycle is much shorter when a dev is needed, say for a direct call rule that involves JS being written. We don't have to go through the normal release cycle and can do it on an ad hoc basis without all the rigmarole of a hot fix.