TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adobe Experience Manager vs. Google Tag Manager vs. Ibexa DXP

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Experience Manager

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Experience Manager is a combined web content management system and digital asset management system. The combined applications of Adobe Experience Manager Sites and Adobe Experience Manager Assets is offered by the vendor as an end-to-end solution for managing and delivering marketing content.N/A

    Google Tag Manager

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AFrom Google, the Google Tag Manager is a tag management application that facilitates creating, embedding, and updating tags across websites and mobile apps. It is a free option, vs. the company's enterprise-tier Google Tag Manager 360.

    $0

    Ibexa DXP

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AIbexa, headquartered in Oslo, helps B2B companies to stay relevant and succeed by transforming traditional sales strategies into frictionless buying experiences, with their eponymous digial experience platform (DXP).

    $20,143.81

    per year

    Pricing
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa Content - Bronze
    € 15,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Bronze
    € 23,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Silver
    €26,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Bronze
    € 30,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Gold
    €37,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Silver
    €40,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Platinum
    €50,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Silver
    €52,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Gold
    €57,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Gold
    €74,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Platinum
    €77,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Platinum
    €100,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Considered Multiple Products
    Adobe
    Chose Adobe Experience Manager
    This tool was not very helpful. We switched to unbounce since Experience Manager was not a complete solution. Our team members have worked with several of these tools and found this one to be the least comprehensive.
    Incentivized
    Google
    Chose Google Tag Manager
    Google Tag Manager is the only tag management tool I have used.
    Incentivized
    Ibexa
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    180 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    145 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    184 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    15 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    113 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    125 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    13 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    8.4
    38 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Google Tag Manager
    8.9
    58 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Ibexa DXP
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Role-based user permissions8.438 Ratings8.958 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    8.0
    33 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Google Tag Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    API7.829 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language8.129 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    7.5
    38 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Google Tag Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    5.4
    1 Ratings
    27% below category average
    WYSIWYG editor7.433 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness6.734 Ratings00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Admin section7.034 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Page templates7.637 Ratings00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Library of website themes7.326 Ratings00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design7.835 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing workflow8.135 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Form generator7.629 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    7.3
    37 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Google Tag Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Content taxonomy7.731 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    SEO support7.133 Ratings00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Bulk management7.236 Ratings00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions7.534 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Community / comment management7.130 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Tag Management
    Comparison of Tag Management features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Google Tag Manager
    8.8
    68 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Ibexa DXP
    -
    Ratings
    Tag library00 Ratings9.163 Ratings00 Ratings
    Tag variable mapping00 Ratings8.955 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ease of writing custom tags00 Ratings7.367 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rules-driven tag execution00 Ratings8.162 Ratings00 Ratings
    Tag performance monitoring00 Ratings10.056 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page load times00 Ratings8.849 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile app tagging00 Ratings9.334 Ratings00 Ratings
    Library of JavaScript extensions00 Ratings8.838 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Management & Integrity
    Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Adobe Experience Manager and Google Tag Manager and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Adobe Experience Manager
    -
    Ratings
    Google Tag Manager
    7.6
    69 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Ibexa DXP
    -
    Ratings
    Event tracking00 Ratings8.666 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile event tracking00 Ratings9.347 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data distribution management00 Ratings8.841 Ratings00 Ratings
    Universal data layer00 Ratings8.358 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated error checking00 Ratings3.045 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Small Businesses
    Yext
    Score6.8 out of 10
    Adobe Experience Platform Launch
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Yext
    Score6.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Adobe Experience Platform Launch
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Progress Sitefinity
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    Progress Sitefinity
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (220 ratings)
    9.7
    (73 ratings)
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (181 ratings)
    7.1
    (18 ratings)
    7.6
    (6 ratings)
    Availability
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.2
    (11 ratings)
    2.0
    (12 ratings)
    8.4
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.8
    (2 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe Experience ManagerGoogle Tag ManagerIbexa DXP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    I'll answer the second one because I mean, the first one I don't have an issue with. The second scenario is we oftentimes have the need to spin off very small campaign style sites or sites that generate leads but are unbranded and that sort of thing. So that's hard to do in AEM because you have to then create another organization within AEM to do that. And we're talking about sites that are maybe five to 10 pages in size. So we've been investigating Edge, but then that's a different workflow, so we'd have to train people on that. So it would be nice if there was something within the AEM structure that could allow you to do something very similar to Edge, where you make some small micro sites that are not necessarily branded, that you could still host within the platform and not have to retrain everybody on a completely different platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I have found Google Tag Manager as the go to solution for managing all of your event and conversion tags for your website. Not only does it make it easy to manage all of your tags in the one place, it is fairly intuitive to use and there is plenty of videos and help documentation online to help set up what ever you need. No scenarios come to mind at the moment on where it is less appropriate to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    I always recommend Ibexa DXP to my fellows. The only scenario that I would not recommend it is if the site is either too small, too simple, or that they simply cannot afford to stand it up properly.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • It allows us to scale so that we can make a change on a global footer. And it applies to all of the different property websites. It allows us to set up components and compartmentalize things in a way. The big thing is that it's scalable. And then it also ties into Adobe Analytics and other Adobe products. So we are a complete Adobe shop. Every Adobe product that we can use, we use. I don't think we do it for marketing so much, but for doing target testing and analytics, data scientists are using the same product and so it all speaks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Selecting elements on a site [object, class, cookie, etc] (to later fire an event, send some data, etc) is very easy with triggers. Want to add an event when someone clicks on a button? Super easy. It was many many DOM selectors and you can even add custom functions if you need to do something more specific
    • In general, firing events in different circumstances is very easy mixing triggers and tags. You can track almost any element of the DOM and do whatever you want with it.
    • Testing is a great functionality. Only you can see what's on the site and you can debug it easily by seeing which events or tags were triggered and all the DOM elements involved (and why they matched the trigger).
    • Working in environments (staging, production) and versioning is easy to do, deploying changes in 2 clicks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Content Taxonomy: Content is managed in a tree. Though taxonomy vs folksonomy is a near-religious debate among professionals, clients seeing the system for the first time just seem to "get it" more often.
    • Content Flexibility: Common content types such as blog posts and articles are available out of the box. However, customizing these and creating new content types is very easy.
    • Developer Friendly: Developers need only a little PHP experience to get started. Of course being an expert doesn't hurt and opens the door for the development of custom modules.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • There are some glitches in permissions inheritance that require us to toggle a save on permissions in groups that inherit from a group that was recently updated.
    • Large packages require stopping the workflow launcher OSGi components or many workflows will slow down the server.
    • Locked pages are hard to find unless I use /siteadmin... I often hear that the CQ tools will go away, but if we lose that, some small things might be harder to do, like finding locked pages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • There are several good integrations, but there can always be more. Native tracking for call tracking solutions, analytics providers, non-Google advertisers would be top of my list.
    • Documentation is just dreadful. Luckily there are some awesome folks out there doing crowdsourced tutorials (shout out to Simo Ahava) but by and large the Google Tag Manager instructions are worth what you pay for them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Limited partners when you compare to other solutions (WordPress, Drupal, etc). It took us a while to find a solid, trusted developer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    We had and still have a fantastic experience using Adobe CQ. Lots of flexibility, great integration with other Adobe products we already use and a powerful technology make it a great fit for our corporate environment. Also as the community grows, it makes it easier to network with other developers and users to get new ideas on how to continue to get the best out of the software.
    Read full review
    Google
    I haven't found another option for us to use especially one that is free. Down the road we may go a different route but for now GTM is a good option and does what we need it to do. It'd be nice to get more support or more integrations but with the free version there's only so much one can expect to get I suppose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    Very happy with current relationship and websites
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Adobe
    Adobe Experience Manager overall is fairly easy to use and caters to a wide range of users when it comes to their technical abilities. It has the flexibility to enable UI/UX designers to pop in and easily design new content with drop in components. It also has sufficient capabilities for those who are more technically inclined and want to dig more into custom code or solutions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No difficult obstacle to overcome but Google Tag Manager can still be difficult for many users to deploy. Sure the basic HTML script can be deployed quite easily, but when you start to require triggers, variables, etc, it can be a little daunting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    It is quite easy to navigate through the backend and also, you can directly work in frontend view. Dynamic content can be created on the fly. Their Landing page features are awesome. You create a page by drag & drop.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    Being part of Adobe Suite means you are already notified when the tool has any outages. However, I have never faced unplanned outages. Whenever you face any issue with the site, it is clearly stated if there were any planned outages and how quickly you will be back to normal. So, I will say that even the outages are planned and managed in a great way like their other services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Adobe
    With respect to performance, Adobe experience manager is one of the best in the CMS space. We didn't observe frequent slowness on platform, however the systems which are accessing experience manager should be of good specifications without which slowness would be observed. Adobe experience manager works well in integration with other solutions, unless the destination application is designed to trigger frequent calls to AEM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    Adobe Experience Manager, in all its capacity, is a great alternative to any other CMS you are using. It helps in rapid development and makes life easier for maintaining the website for multi-language sites. Technical know-how is eliminated at content authoring. Better documentation in terms of live examples with videos would be appreciated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    GTM does not provide support. This is one of GTM's biggest issues but it's due to the level of customization for each website. If your team thinks they would heavily rely on the need for a support staff it is probably better to invest in a paid service with a team that can support your needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    They are directly reachable and help you to deal with other services, e.g. if would like to set up a CDN for China or if you would like to integrate a tool like HubSpot. If there is anything you are missing, they help you to find a workaround until they can deliver such items - like local language versions.
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Adobe
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    I thought there was a little bit too much emphasis on AdWords stuff, not enough on the generic application of GTM.
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Depending on your individual needs, It is really quite simple to create an authoring experience for a website that looks really good. I have been part of many implementations and many teams and have seen many projects that were super successful and others that were not implemented well. AEM has room for a lot of flexibility in the implementation process compared to other CMS like SharePoint
    Read full review
    Google
    Planning and communication will help greatly with an in-house implementation. If there are large teams, try to limit the number of people involved to 1-2 developers (back-end dev may be necessary depending on your platform), one analytics marketer and one project manager.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    The partner selected makes a significant impact on the usability and experience
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    SSO is one fits all, so we don't have to have a separate SSO for each application of Adobe The integration with Analytics works perfectly and bring directly value really quickly Target remains more complicated to set up, but can also bring a lot of value once integrated with the rest of the Adobe platform The fact that the solution is Cloud services is also a big advantage for maintenance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    We moved to GTM from a standard Google Analytics implementation. GTM is much more flexible and easier to make changes, especially as the changes relate to multiple sites and environments. While there is a learning curve when figuring out how to use GTM, I believe the change has been worth it because it helps us understand at a more fundamental level how our tracking works and gives us a lot more control over what we track and how.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    eZ Publish isn't as large in community size and number of installations as other content management systems. However, it's just as capable and met our needs:
    • Developers, system administrators, and project manager can all speak the same language during the development and maintenance cycles of a site.
    • End-user training is very straight-forward.
    • Vendor support is available.
    • Client IT departments can access if need (developers/designers/sysadmins).
    • The community is there (forums) and there are solid contributions (extensions) from both the vendor and the community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Adobe
    Instead of being directly involved in the tool purchase, I am involved in analysis or what we can use to maximize the tool. Small organizations may find it expensive. However, if the team or organization focuses more on your ROI or the features you will get, then it will definitely be worth it. Pricing is based on a number of factors, including team size or the use of the tool. The user can select the pricing option that best fits their needs based on the number of form submissions they make or the number of pages they wish to publish on their global/multisite sites.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    We’ve priced other enterprise products and found Ibexa DXP to be a bit more expensive. However, not enough to dissuade us from staying with the product.
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Adobe
    The professional services team within adobe is one of the best in terms of technical and solutioning knowledge. However, considering the billing charges of adobe professional services team, it is always recommended to involve them during platform initial setup or when a complex solution is to be built with platform customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    The partner ecosystem is small. However, we've worked with two Ibexa partners over the last 10 years. They were very skilled. They were great companies. We've interviewed other Ibexa partners in North America. We found them all to be professional with solid resumes.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • too soon to tell on increased conversion rates based on external marketing factors in play but having increased visibility into customer engagement trends will most likely lead to improvement of our conversion rates.
    • There have been productivity gains from the perspective of actually migrating all of our externally managed sites to the same in-house Adobe Experience Manager platform and then being able to utilize those universal components.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • GTM is very useful to determine if a particular element on the site is useful (i.e. is it being watched, is it being clicked, does it help customers navigate through more pages). As an SEO person, I can use this information to decide what to optimize for but also to track progress and see improvements in engagement.
    • With the use of Google Tag Manager, I was able to easily inject an A/B testing tool which lead to several improvements in lead generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Common knowledge: By making eZ a core offering, developers, system administrators, and project managers were able to communicate with each other effectively.
    • Training: Due to its content taxonomy, end-user training often went well.
    • Support: In our case, we had Gold support from eZ Publish which saved time and helped with customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Adobe Experience Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of AEM Forms - Creates an adaptive formScreenshot of AEM Forms - themes libraryScreenshot of AEM Forms - where to create a templateScreenshot of AEM Forms - the interactive communications editorScreenshot of Adobe Experience Manager Sites - document-based authoring enables marketers to create and publish content with familiar tools.Screenshot of Adobe Experience Manager Sites - Universal Editor, an advanced visual editor, empowers marketers to edit and publish content.