Adobe Workfront vs. Azure DevOps Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Workfront
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Workfront, acquired by Adobe in late 2020, is a web-based project-management tool. It is designed for both IT and marketing teams, but can be implemented for any kind of project. Workfront offers all the features standard to project management platforms, as well as resource allocation, automation, and agile workflow.N/A
Azure DevOps Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is the on-premise version of Azure DevOps. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
Pricing
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Considered Both Products
Adobe Workfront
Chose Adobe Workfront
We liked the flexibility and ease of creating custom forms and fields. We also felt that they were heading in the right direction and growing as a company.
Chose Adobe Workfront
The other tools that we used in the past were simple and therefore the capabilities were really limited. Workfront is quite complex in what it can do which is something we didn't see with the other tools we used. We also were able to make Workfront work for ever facet of our …
Chose Adobe Workfront
We really thought that Workfront had the best capability match based on our desires. It was a broad toolset that seemed to address many facets of functionality we were looking for. It mostly came down to capability and price when making our decision.
Chose Adobe Workfront
As mentioned we are using Team Foundation Services for our Agile Scrum delivery although Workfront does has its own Agile project management capability. I've seen numerous work management systems on the market (for instance SalesForce), but these appear to be a collection of a …
Chose Adobe Workfront
MS Project provides similar core project management functionality (task lists, Gantt charts, resource allocation) but it does come close to Workfront's capabilities related to custom data, forms, ticket queues, notes (updates), and especially reporting and dashboards.

Salesforce
Chose Adobe Workfront
The team collaboration and communication tools won over our users!
Azure DevOps Server

No answer on this topic

Features
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Workfront
7.4
346 Ratings
5% below category average
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
Task Management8.7345 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.6315 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.3276 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.0311 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.7312 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.0332 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology6.5216 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.4228 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.5314 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.4263 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access5.8262 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.9249 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.3243 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management6.8214 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Workfront
6.0
199 Ratings
25% below category average
Azure DevOps Server
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates6.4102 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing5.888 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting6.4194 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software5.679 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(383 ratings)
9.0
(48 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(61 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(19 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(12 ratings)
8.4
(10 ratings)
In-Person Training
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.9
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.3
(10 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe WorkfrontAzure DevOps Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe
Workfront enables us to manage all our projects effectively while providing a comprehensive overview of team resources. The Resource Planner helps the team identify their capacity to determine whether they are over- or under-allocated. This information is crucial for project planning and ensuring team members do not experience burnout.
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is good to use if you are all-in on the Microsoft Azure stack. It's fully integrated across Azure so it is a point-and-click for most of what you will need to achieve. If you are new to Azure make sure you get some outside experience to help you otherwise it is very easy to overcomplicate things and go down the wrong track, or for you to manually create things that come out of the box.
Read full review
Pros
Adobe
  • Fosters communication between team members.
  • Serves as a virtual "to do list" for me personally - I can track where I am with projects and what there is left to do, and when it's completed.
  • Sharing documents between team members that can be updated.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Reporting Integration- Azure boards provides Kanban and other dashboard, their templates for easy management of project.
  • Project Pipeline- easy integration and development of CI/CD pipelines, helped in testing, releasing project artifacts.
  • Version Control- Integration with Git and code IDE made it easy to share, review our code, fix bugs and do testing.
Read full review
Cons
Adobe
  • It can sometimes be a bit difficult to keep track of multiple projects
  • Hard to include people who do not have a Adobe Workfront account
  • I wish there were better notifications around when tasks are removed or you are unassigned from a task
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Can add more build templates for specific technology requirements
  • Can have more features in dashboards which can help dev teams stream line their tasks and priorities
  • Can have raise alarm feature in case of any sort of failure in devops pipeline execution
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Adobe
All that I've said already is why. I suppose the clearest way to say it is that at this point? I cannot imagine running the 300+ active projects in eMarketing without AtTask; it simply wouldn't be possible and even more; I wouldn't imagine why we'd try to find an alternative tool when we have one meeting our needs.
Read full review
Microsoft
Because we are a Microsoft Gold Partner we utilize most of their software and we have so much invested in Team Foundation Server now it would take a catastrophic amount of time and resources to switch to a different product.
Read full review
Usability
Adobe
Workfront is overly complex, but it is functional as a tool to keep track of projects. It is a shame that sometimes it takes a lot of clicks to find anything. Workfront is slowly modernizing its interface but at the same time, hides certain information away thus making the experience feels worse.
Read full review
Microsoft
For standard users the interface is friendly. but if you are a manager some tools are a little confusing to use, like the query system that you always need to create from scratch. Templates should be more helpful for queries and for standard procedures that you need to duplicate PBIs over time. The search history of Work Items is a little painful to use.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Adobe
Maintenance is required, but usually after work hours, Some days the proofing tool function is not operational, but this is a new function of the tool that WF is working out. the kinks on. Chrome is the best browser to use the system in and we find Firefox and Explorer lose some view functionality - Gantt Chart, Resource Grid
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Performance
Adobe
Workfront's performance has been very good. Everything always feels very fast and snappy in my experience. We have integrated it with custom scripts to create folder structure for media managing our projects. It works very well.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Adobe
I know that this particular company has it's own Adobe Workfront employee that builds out things they need from the software, and meets with them regularly to troubleshoot. I'm not part of this process, but it's refreshing to see Adobe provide this level of customer service to people, and they're expedient.
Read full review
Microsoft
I have not had to use the support for Azure DevOps Server. There have never been any issues where I was not able to figure it out or quickly resolve. Our Scrum Master has used support before though, and the service has always been prompt and clear with a customer-focus
Read full review
In-Person Training
Adobe
It was from my boss, not a rep from AtTask.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Adobe
The training is very easy to use and you can simply choose the topics included in the course(s) that are most important to your training needs. After each training course, you are tested on what you have learned. If you need a refresher course, they provide Course Catalogs as well as instructor-led courses & workshops.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Adobe
Most people learn as you go, a lot of this stuff requires trial and error throughout so my suggestion is to provide as much information in the upfront and keep it as simple as possible. You can add other tools and features as you go but everyone should have the basics down so no bad habits can start to develop. Be persistent with everyone, and don't be afraid to correct and talk through steps again so everyone is on the same page
Read full review
Microsoft
Do research beforehand and, if possible, do a trial run before implementing into production environment.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adobe
It's been a while since I've used another time and resource management platform, but I would say that Adobe Workfront takes the cake. Its newly refreshed user interface is simple to navigate, whereas other platforms can be quite confusing when "drilling down" on a project. Also, Adobe Workfront has features that I have not seen in other platforms, including collaboration capabilities and the ability to upload a document as proof so it can be reviewed for grammar, consistency, formatting, etc., before being presented or sent to a client.
Read full review
Microsoft
In my opinion, DevOps covers the development process end to end way better than Jira or GitHub. Both competitors are nice in their specific fields but DevOps provides a more comprehensive package in my opinion. It is still crazy to see that the whole suite can be used for free. The productivity increase we realized with DevOps is worth real money!
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Adobe
As I stated earlier, I didn't have to pay for Workfront myself- I'm a user under a large organization. I know it's not cheap to implement, I don't know how the price scales for a small-business, but I do like the product enough that I'm going to look into it in the future for my own company.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Adobe
We have been using Workfront for about 3 years. During this time they continue to be a very stable project management system. Workfront's overall scalability is able to handle increased loads of work. When using Workfront for a project management tool for the web team, we store documents, images & video's without any issues. They work with their customer's to provide the best project management system in the market today! I highly recommend Workfront for all project management needs. Workfront strives to deliver unique technology solutions to growing companies!
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Adobe
  • It will help teams to manage their workflow and impact on the overall productivity.
  • Also, one-stop for the higher management to know [the] status [of] all projects in one go - more visibility, comfort tracking.
  • Easy to track what is in backlog for the team and if any individual [is] stuck on a particular task.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has streamlined the pipeline and project management for our agile effort.
  • It has helped our agile team get organized since that is a new methodology being leveraged within the Enterprise.
  • The calendar has improved visibility into different OOOs across the project team since we all come from different departments across the larger organization.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Adobe Workfront Screenshots

Screenshot of Tasks in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Work Requests in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Review Functionality in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Adobe Workfront Planning