TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Workfront

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Workfront, acquired by Adobe in late 2020, is a web-based project-management tool. It is designed for both IT and marketing teams, but can be implemented for any kind of project. Workfront offers all the features standard to project management platforms, as well as resource allocation, automation, and agile workflow.N/A

    Microsoft Project Server

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Project Server is a project portfolio management option.N/A
    Pricing
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Considered Both Products
    Adobe
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Workfront is on par with the others, each has their strengths and weaknesses.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Personalization is the main reason.
    Access everywhere where internet is available.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Easier to use, easier to maintain, better collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Workfront is very easy to use from a UI perspective. With other project management tools, there is often times a lot of training that is necessary to go live. With Workfront we held an hour training session and rolled the tool out to the department with minimal issues.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Workfront is much more accessible to all project stakeholders and individual contributors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    It's not up to par with these other products.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    We selected Workfront, in part, because of its focus on marketing project delivery and its ability to integrate with Proof HQ (which we also use). The addition of Proof HQ allows us to completely migrate away from our old pen-and-paper process and into the digital world.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    I do not feel educated enough to add comments to this section, as we did not do a thorough comparison of these products. We merely looked at cost, basic info and the portfolio management features. We already had Workfront and were exploring our options.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    Workfront's user interface is one of the best that I've seen and is one of the big reasons why I am a big Workfront champion. The other projects had similar functionality but Workfront is the easiest to use in my opinion. Buttons are where you think they would be and things …
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Workfront
    For agile, I prefer the Atlassian suite, but for waterfall projects, Workfront was the right choice. In choosing Workfront (then AtTask), I made a weighted grid of features and benefits of a number of project management tools, including WorkZone, Asana, Celoxis, MS Project, …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    125 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    91 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    122 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    56 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    69 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Project Server
    Feature
    Adobe Workfront
    7.3
    421 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Microsoft Project Server
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.5421 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management7.3379 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts6.6331 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.0372 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation7.5377 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration8.0400 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology7.0271 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology7.2279 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management7.3378 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration7.2323 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access5.7312 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking7.7299 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management7.3300 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management7.2258 Ratings00 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Project Server
    Feature
    Adobe Workfront
    6.3
    240 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Microsoft Project Server
    -
    Ratings
    Quotes/estimates6.6133 Ratings00 Ratings
    Invoicing6.0115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting6.7230 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software5.9103 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Small Businesses
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Tempo Portfolio Manager (formerly LiquidPlanner)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Planview PPM Pro
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Planview PPM Pro
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (474 ratings)
    8.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.6
    (63 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    6.4
    (19 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.3
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.3
    (10 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe WorkfrontMicrosoft Project Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    Since I work remotely from my laptop, when I am finished with work, I enter my hours and submit my time at the end of the week. It's quick, it's easy, and it helps me keep a record of how many hours of vacation and sick time I have used. But when I am on the go, it is a hassle to record my time on my phone because of the lack of responsive design.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Project Server I believe is best for any organization from small to large. As I mentioned, it is a little pricey so I would do research into alternative software and depending on your needs maybe look at all options, competing software. This is a tool with a learning curve and some may not be able to easily navigate this software. There isn't really great training, resources available for this tool however there are some free YouTube tutorial videos. This is great for cross company, department project management, sharing, managing of projects and timelines.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • Fosters communication between team members.
    • Serves as a virtual "to do list" for me personally - I can track where I am with projects and what there is left to do, and when it's completed.
    • Sharing documents between team members that can be updated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Project planning: tasks assignments, resources allocation, progress and cost tracking. The Server version is the natural extension of the Microsoft Project standalone.
    • Provides one place to manage all projects, accessible by everyone in the team. This opens the plan updates to team members as well(on their tasks), as opposed to being done only by the project manager.
    • Reporting and visualization - resources utilization, timeline etc
    • The integration with the Microsoft Project standalone: if you don't like the web version, you can download the latest and work locally. When done just sync it back to the server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • The product itself is very complicated and difficult to be stood up
    • Sharing and proofing workflows require multiple steps and layers
    • It may just be my organization, but the build feels a bit clunky and difficult to navigate, which deters many teams from using the tool effectively
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Resource loading and leveling extremely complicated within the tool
    • Software makes incorrect assumptions and changes without user knowledge
    • Inconsistencies within the tool make it hard to predict & troubleshoot
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    Workfront is sometimes a bit clunky to use, but overall it works well for our teams when it comes to project management and collaboration across multiple, involved teams. It also has flexibility that allows us to adapt it to diverse use cases, some of which aren't necessarily always the first things that one would think of using workfront for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Adobe
    Workfront is overly complex, but it is functional as a tool to keep track of projects. It is a shame that sometimes it takes a lot of clicks to find anything. Workfront is slowly modernizing its interface but at the same time, hides certain information away thus making the experience feels worse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We don't have to worry about maintenance, upgrades, or compatibility issues. All the capabilities we need are there, and are easily customizable.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    I have found that Adobe Workfront is a reliable resource, because in the post 6 years of using it, rarely has it been unavailable to our team. I think I could count on one hand the number of times the site has been down over my time using it with my team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Adobe
    I think overall, Adobe Workfront performs well. There have been some times when it doesn't load or run as quickly as our team would like. This is frustrating when it is such a crucial tool that our team utilizes on a daily basis. It can show our workflow when it lags.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    I know that this particular company has it's own Adobe Workfront employee that builds out things they need from the software, and meets with them regularly to troubleshoot. I'm not part of this process, but it's refreshing to see Adobe provide this level of customer service to people, and they're expedient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Adobe
    It was from my boss, not a rep from AtTask.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Adobe
    The training is very easy to use and you can simply choose the topics included in the course(s) that are most important to your training needs. After each training course, you are tested on what you have learned. If you need a refresher course, they provide Course Catalogs as well as instructor-led courses & workshops.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Most people learn as you go, a lot of this stuff requires trial and error throughout so my suggestion is to provide as much information in the upfront and keep it as simple as possible. You can add other tools and features as you go but everyone should have the basics down so no bad habits can start to develop. Be persistent with everyone, and don't be afraid to correct and talk through steps again so everyone is on the same page
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Per Microsoft, Project Online provides more value long-term by reducing infrastructure cost and increase feature release cycle time
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    Much increased functionality and templating aspects. While I liked JIRA's setup, the Workfront is so much more flexible. The moving away from Jira i was able to show the possibilities of what a full pm software could accommodate and how it all connected in. Also, the pluses of connectivity with the Adobe suite for our creative teams were excellent. From providing updates within other programs, it allowed a much more fluid working process and instant communication.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    One of the key advantages of Microsoft Project Server (MSPS) is its ecosystem. It gels very well with SharePoint, Office, Office 365. The support from Microsoft is also a key driver and they are very experienced and many ways to resolve issues. Also, Microsoft has bridged the gap of cloud offering from other competitors by providing Project Online. It is an offering through Office 365 which is very lean and low maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Adobe
    As I stated earlier, I didn't have to pay for Workfront myself- I'm a user under a large organization. I know it's not cheap to implement, I don't know how the price scales for a small-business, but I do like the product enough that I'm going to look into it in the future for my own company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Adobe
    Our organization has thousands of users that use Workfront and it seems to hold up very well. I have not encountered any issues using it and I think it makes it very easy for multiple people to be involved in a project and keep things organized and clear for everyone involved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • Increased efficiency in threaded updates to Outlook emails - no time wasted looking for things in email vs Workfront - they automatically are in both places.
    • Time tracking allows us to average out how much time tasks & deliverable types take, allowing better long-term forecasting.
    • Planning has given us a system of record for campaigns, allowing us to easily find historic plans and/or view calendar views of upcoming ones.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • We've been able to reduce the number of staff in our PMO by utilising the Project Server data in Power BI, reducing the need for manual reporting.
    • Being able to forecast utilization in the product allows us to accurately estimate resource needs to ensure optimum staff levels.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Adobe Workfront Screenshots

    Screenshot of Tasks in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Work Requests in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Review Functionality in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Adobe Workfront Planning