Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) vs. Atlassian Confluence vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon EKS
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed container service to run and scale Kubernetes applications in the cloud or on-premises, available on AWS or on-premise through Amazon EKS Anywhere.
$0.10
per month
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…N/A
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Editions & Modules
Amazon EKS Cluster
$.10
per hour of each cluster created
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon EKSConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Considered Multiple Products
Amazon EKS

No answer on this topic

Confluence

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Code Engine
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
Code enigine is much easier to understand.
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
it is as good as them
Features
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
8.9
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.0
157 Ratings
11% below category average
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Task Management00 Ratings7.1125 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.221 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings6.389 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings6.7116 Ratings00 Ratings
Search00 Ratings6.8155 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.2126 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
157 Ratings
1% below category average
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Chat00 Ratings6.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings8.2154 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings9.0148 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings9.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.610 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
156 Ratings
4% below category average
IBM Cloud Code Engine
-
Ratings
Versioning00 Ratings8.2135 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings6.896 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings8.3151 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.6146 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings8.3113 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings5.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings8.384 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Code Engine
6.6
15 Ratings
16% below category average
Scalability00 Ratings00 Ratings6.515 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings00 Ratings6.715 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(173 ratings)
6.7
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(21 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(61 ratings)
6.2
(11 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(25 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)Atlassian ConfluenceIBM Cloud Code Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
It is well suited when you want to have a Kubernetes cluster in AWS Cloud and want to avoid all the management overhead of maintaining your own cluster in terms of the control plane. EKS seems to be lacking in features when compared with AKS and GKE. Backups, service mesh, and monitoring have a lot of room for improvements.
Read full review
Atlassian
I would recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies that want to have internal documentation and minimum governance processes to ensure documentation is useful and doesn't have a lot of duplicated and non-updated content. I wouldn't recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies with a low budget since this product might be a little costly (especially with add-ons).
Read full review
IBM
It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Upgrade the kubernetes clusters to the latest version with a single click
  • Auto scaling policies to automatically scale the nodes
  • Detailed logs and events on the cluster within the EKS clusters portal, cloudwatch logs and metrics
Read full review
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
IBM
  • Managed Environment for partners and customers - shifting skills and speed to CSP
  • A variety of programming model support
  • Elastic scalability for cloud native development and speed
  • Flexible consumption model
  • Containerized workloads with horizontal scalability
  • Here is an example - live demo walk-thru delivered to partners and community:
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBClYgpDFg
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • AWSIAM integration with Kubernetes RBAC could be better.
  • Enabling some add-ons like service mesh, and monitoring will be nice instead of having to install them yourself after the creation of the cluster.
  • EKS bootstrap time could be faster ...
Read full review
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
IBM
  • the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
  • sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
  • uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
IBM
Since this capability supports a wide variety of use cases - all on non proprietary and open technology based frameworks
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Cluster maintanence is reduced, easier to deploy resources, great observability insights
Read full review
Atlassian
Great for organizing knowledge in a hierarchical format. Seamless for engineering and product teams managing software development. Helps in formatting pages effectively, reducing manual work. Tracks changes well and allows for easy rollbacks. Granular controls for who can view/edit pages. Search function is not great which needs improvement. Hire some google engineers
Read full review
IBM
Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Performance
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
It feels like AWS is behind the EKS race, the only advantage I'm able to see right now is the support of IPv6, however, trying to promote AWS alternatives that are different from the market and more like a vendor locking solutions like ECS/Fargate have kept AWS behind and focusing on the wrong things. EKS needs to really improve its integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem and have an enterprise solution for monitoring, backups, and service mesh.
Read full review
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
IBM
What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
Read full review
Scalability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Good performance of platform without hiccups
  • Less number of people required to manage cluster
  • Easier to deploy new microservices
Read full review
Atlassian
  • The AI feature which lets me find relevant documents while reading one document is really beneficial.
  • Centralising of knowledge systems is one of the key differentiators for large organisations.
  • As long as folks keep using Google Docs and Atlassian Confluence, there is going to be a challenge in building a continuum.
Read full review
IBM
  • [One] positive is that we have one tool to learn (and a simple one) for all kinds of deployment. We need less people to maintain the system.
  • We have saved a lot of time on trouble shooting. It's clear how it works. It's "just" kubernetes..
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots

Screenshot of