Amazon Route 53 vs. iContact

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Route 53
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Route 53 is a Cloud Domain Name System (DNS) offered by Amazon AWS as a reliable way to route visitors to web applications and other site traffic to locations within a company's infrastructure, which can be configured to monitor the health and performance of traffic and endpoints in the network.
$0.40
Per Zone Per Month
iContact
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
iContact is an email marketing solution that was acquired by Vocus in 2012. The product is integrated with Facebook and Twitter and is aimed at SMBs with unlimited sending as a key feature.
$15
per month
Pricing
Amazon Route 53iContact
Editions & Modules
Standard
$0.40
Per Zone Per Month
Queries
$0.60
Per Million Queries
1500 Users
$15.00
per month
2500 Users
$25.00
per month
5000 Users
$45.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Route 53iContact
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Route 53iContact
Considered Both Products
Amazon Route 53
Chose Amazon Route 53
We chose Amazon Route 53 over Azure DNS for its advanced routing, built-in health checks, and seamless integration with AWS services like EC2, ALB, and CloudFront. Amazon Route 53 also supports domain registration and automated failover, which Azure DNS lacks natively. Its …
Chose Amazon Route 53
We didn't test any other product like Amazon Route 53, we were doing all these settings by ourselves.
Chose Amazon Route 53
We purchased our domain names through Networksolutions.com and do rely on their DNS services for basic functionality (SPF hard reject records, etc.), since it was included at no cost; however, for our main domains, we utilize Route 53 because of AWS's high availability, …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Amazon is priced higher than Google's DNS, but since our gear (Cloudfront, ALB, etc) is in AWS, Amazon Route 53 is easier to use sop we don't have to manage two vendors.
Chose Amazon Route 53
Cloudflare is also similar in the features to Route 53. However, since we are completely hosted on the AWS cloud, we can't use Cloudflare for configuring our internal networks, and integrating with the other services. The API based integration of AWS via Terraform is another …
Chose Amazon Route 53
This was the POC that was done during the initial stage but we never put this in production
Chose Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53 DNS service is much better than GCP and Azure or any other cloud provider DNS service due to the fact that it not only provides basic DNS service but on top of it it offers firewall DNS feature i.e. rules and policies can be defined to allow/reject certain …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Since we are heavy users of AWS, it was only natural for us to go with Route53. It's well integrated with other AWS services, and domain creation and modifications can get automated with the infrastructure itself, with tools like terraform.
We also use Cloudfront and ALBs …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53 is intended for simple websites that host HTML5 or static content. This is probably the default solution if you need something simple and don't want to rent a web server to host a website. It is good to host full functional but simple website or HTML5 game.
Chose Amazon Route 53
Kinda of costly and doesn't have many services which Amazon is able to offer. And Route 53 is slightly faster than it.
Chose Amazon Route 53
When working with AWS, Route 53 is hands down the better solution. If you live in GCP, then Google Cloud DNS is the way to go. GoDaddy is more of a consumer-facing product and is perfectly fine when Services are not being utilized in any Cloud Environment. Eventually, all of …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Route 53 is one of those essential services that you'll inevitably come across. It's one of the easiest to understand and configure in AWS, and using it is helpful if you're making use of any other components in the AWS ecosystem because most other components will …
Chose Amazon Route 53
I only compared to BIND, as we intend to migrate to AWS as soon as possible.
Chose Amazon Route 53
Both Azure DNS and GoDaddy's DNS works great, but when you use AWS services and infrastructure, it is much easier to use AWS DNS service. Using AWS DNS service you can manage and maintain your infrastructure in one place, it saves some time. If you use AWS services, you can …
Chose Amazon Route 53
GoDaddy is fine if you just want to have a domain and set up a few simple records. But if part of your business is transferring domains and constantly updating records for new websites, email changes, and security, then a registrar-based DNS service just won't cut it. Route 53 …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Infoblox is the one we used on premises and briefly looked at for AWS. Route 53 however is well suited for our needs and was easier to implement. As AWS was already new for use, learning Route 53 anew made no difference in selecting it.
Chose Amazon Route 53
CloudFlare has been good for anything external facing, but Route53 has met our needs perfectly for anything internal.
Chose Amazon Route 53
Route 53 is head and shoulders above GoDaddy. GoDaddy's DNS availability was problematic with us earlier on and at that time we made a decision to move our domains to Route 53 under Amazon. Since then we haven't experienced any DNS outages and it has been pretty rock solid. …
Chose Amazon Route 53
Route53 was used because I initially thought we were going to have our infrastructure on AWS. Once our team transitioned to Google Cloud, I was left scrambling to migrate our DNS solution to point to those servers instead. Because there is a mandatory 45-day transfer wait …
Chose Amazon Route 53
I have experience running several on-site DNS services such as PowerDNS, djbdns, bind, and others. Route 53 removes the need to manage the server and DNS software, allowing you to focus on the DNS content itself.
iContact
Chose iContact
PosterMyWall is used for the design of social media, flyers, websites, and printing purposes. We previously used PosterMyWall for email campaigns, but it was standard and time-consuming. This is why we made the switch to iContact, for more effection and a way to reach potential …
Chose iContact
ClickDimensions was more comprehensive but buggy and not stable. We lost a lot of data which negated the benefits. iContact doesn't do as much but is stable and reliable. ClickDimensions support was awful. iContact support has been fine for us. ClickDimensions assigned us …
Chose iContact
Sendinblue, Mailchimp, Sumo.
We're moving to Sendinblue because it was better priced with better features. Sumo is more bit more geared towards building email lists -- although it fails miserably because it cannot accurately report #contact or visits to your site. Mailchimp …
Chose iContact
In my opinion, MailChimp is the top contender to iContact and really gives them a run for their money. MailChimp offers users more features, and costs less. Of course, they both have their advantages and disadvantages. Overall, it is a tough decision to make between the two, …
Chose iContact
iContact is more fancier in that you can add pictures, change font types & sizes, etc. Infinite Campus is more for just sending emails to all your students. I still use Infinite Campus but like iContact more.
Chose iContact
iContact and Constant Contact are very similar products, however I prefer the iContact interface. Mailchimp may have more features but is harder to train users who are not familiar with email campaigns.
Chose iContact
I haven't used other products for the same features that iContact offers, but I have used products like Mailchimp which sends out massive emails or postcards and such. Personally, I prefer iContact because you're able to personalize it and have the ability to send the emails …
Chose iContact
More versatile and less restrictive regarding content. I tried Constant Contact first and quickly became frustrated and was happy to find iContact.
Chose iContact
We selected iContact because it was available at the time, and in our price range. I inherited it at the school. If it had been the program it is now back then, I would not have chosen it. At the moment, we are too busy to fully vet another program, so we are stuck with this …
Chose iContact
I didn't actually choose iContact, it was already implemented when I started working for the company. I haven't looked too deeply into switching because it works for our needs right now. I would love to find another service with more customization and surveys included, but …
Chose iContact
iContact's inbox deliverability is better than that of Infusionsoft.
iContact's marketing automation abilities are not as good as Infusionsoft.
iContact's tagging and list managements functionality are not as good as Infusionsoft.
Chose iContact
We converted from Lyris to iContact years ago and enjoy the analysis features iContact provides over Lyris.
Chose iContact
iContact was the solution in use when I entered the organization. I have heard very good things about MailChimp and Constant Contact, the other two big names in this field. We have chosen to remain with iContact since then, but would be open to moving. However, it is fulfilling …
Chose iContact
I have personally used MailChimp and Constant Contact. Plus, a back-end WordPress plug-in that I've since forgotten the name of as well as Active.com's email platform.
Chose iContact
IContact offered more flexibility, the ability to designate more users in different departments, and better-looking templates. The ability to ask for support and customized templates is also a key, and their account manager is available to respond to issues, offer advice, etc. …
Chose iContact
Robly has the ability to send at the time when they expect that there is a user going to open. However, iContact is much more professional in their support and having a dedicated account manager who has a grasp on the latest in e-mail marketing was a primary reason we select …
Chose iContact
We didn't select iContact initially, our team was handed it as an existing tool. Our other tool is Pardot which is connected to our Salesforce instance. We don't have iContact connected to the database because we use it for entirely different messaging. Since we didn't choose …
Chose iContact
We previously used another product, Vertical Response, but ultimately chose iContact because we felt the newsletter editor was more easily adaptable (from a brand perspective we were able to customize the template to fit our brand). Additionally, from a pricing standpoint, …
Chose iContact
iContact far outperformed emailbrain in getting my emails to our subscribers (delivery rate) but with emailbrain I could easily send hyperlinks that opened pdf. documents, see how my email was going to look in a couple dozen different variations (gmail, yahoo, desktop, mobile), …
Chose iContact
I plan to use MailChimp going forward. I understand from trusted colleagues that it is as good as IContact and FREE.
Chose iContact
We are no longer using iContact, but if you were comparing them to Constant contact, Mail Chimp, etc. then go with one of those, their software is more current and they have better analytics, but will still be in the cheaper price bracket. Currently, we are using our ESP, …
Chose iContact
It offered the best cost to feature ratio and was easy to use. The other systems were great as well, but the potential integration with our CRM (Salesforce), was one of the key deciding factors. Also, icontact was included with the Vocus marketing suite which offered other …
Features
Amazon Route 53iContact
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Route 53
-
Ratings
iContact
6.6
Ratings
20% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Dynamic content00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Landing pages00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
A/B testing00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
List management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Route 53
-
Ratings
iContact
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Route 53
-
Ratings
iContact
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
URL Validation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Link Tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Image Validation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inbox Display00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Email Accessibility Tools00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Spam Testing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Email Previews00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Route 53iContact
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Google Cloud DNS
Google Cloud DNS
Score 10.0 out of 10
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Route 53iContact
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Route 53iContact
Likelihood to Recommend
- Routing users to the closest or best-performing resources: Route 53 allows you to use geolocation and latency-based routing to route users to the resources that will give them the best performance. - Load balancing: Route 53 can be used to distribute incoming traffic across multiple resources, such as Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances or Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) tasks, to improve the availability and scalability of your application. - Managing domain names: Route 53 can be used to register domain names and manage DNS records, making it a one-stop solution for managing your domain name and routing traffic to your resources. Scenarios where Route 53 is less appropriate include:Applications with very high query rates: Route 53 is designed to handle millions of queries per second, but if your application generates an extremely high query rate, you may need to use a specialized DNS service.Applications that require very low latency: Route 53 is designed to provide low-latency DNS service, but if your application requires ultra-low latency, you may need to use a specialized DNS service or a self-hosted DNS solution.Applications that require advanced security features: Route 53 provides basic security features such as DNSSEC, but if your application requires advanced security features such as DDoS protection, you may need to use a specialized DNS service.
Read full review
iContact is a great option for small businesses. It doesn't have enough features to create the demands of a large corporation. Of course the price goes up exponentially with more subscribers, which would also make it beneficial for small businesses. If you have too many lists to add people to it can get a little crazy too.
Read full review
Pros
  • We can purchase our domain through Route 53 and can be hosted for cheaper prices in AWS.
  • There are many number of routing policies you can go ahead with and this will come into picture when the customer satisfaction is required at most, so choose routing policy accordingly.
  • As usual health checks are part of DNS systems, this is also provided at cheaper rates when total process is done in Route 53 service.
  • It can be used as standalone application from AWS
Read full review
  • Customer service is wonderful! They are always helpful, guiding and available for any odd question, even if those questions are training for a newbie to the email world.
  • Building forms for data collection and the code generator the for the site is very easy.
  • Ensuring double opt-in is extremely straightforward.
  • Including unsubscribe on every message automatically means we never have to worry about CAN-SPAM.
Read full review
Cons
  • Price, it is not expensive ... but you can find some cheaper and even free DNS solutions.
  • If you use non-AWS infrastructure, Route 53 doesn't have significant advantages on other services.
  • AWS Route 53 does not support forwarding or conditional forwarding options for domains used on an on-premise network.
Read full review
  • Every time you edit or sometimes open an email it brings it to the top of the list. I would prefer my email to go to the top only after I send it out to my subscribers.
  • When I add a new contact I sometimes copy and paste the email. This is not allowed sometimes and I have to manually type the email in.
  • LinkedIn will not allow you to add pictures anymore when sending emails out.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
After 4 years of using iContact we finally cut the cord. It was hard to justify staying with them when it seemed like they had some of the most outdated software in the industry, some of the worst deliverability, and were in general extremely lacking in customization. They are a decent ESP for a great price point, so if that is your main concern it may be worth it, but if you want to have your emails you are paying for hit inboxes (not spam folders) then look into someone else that guarantees great deliverability.
Read full review
Usability
You need to know what DNS is; this is a tool built for developers who already know the technology and are just looking for a DNS management tool. The tool is very usable given that. If you're not familiar with DNS, Route53 isn't really for you and you won't find it to be very usable-- you'll need to go read the documentation, and that will start with learning what DNS is
Read full review
I rate iContact as an easy to use program due to its user friendly dashboard and user interface. Most companies of small to medium size do not have a dedicated marketer, therefore it is someone multitasking who may or may not have this kind of experience. iContact makes it relatively simple and can actually expand one's knowledge in the area of business promotion.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
iContact is regularly up and running. Only once has it been unavailable for maintenance, which is to be expected and even desired for optimal performance when needed.
Read full review
Support Rating
Until today, I have never needed support to Route53 because the documentation is great. But, I have needed it for other services. And they're near perfect always. Except that they don't have Portuguese support yet and they're sometimes slow to answer (48 hours in non-critical ones, in two tickets). But usually, they're amazing!
Read full review
They have always been responsive to any issues or concerns that have arisen with our account. Our customer account manager participates in our monthly county-wide communicators meetings via telephone to ensure that we are getting the most from the service. He also analyzes our lists to help us weed out inactive contacts.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The templates are difficult to customize, and they don't render well in email platforms
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
i wouldn't be using it if i wasn't satisfied. time is money
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cloudflare is also similar in the features to Route 53. However, since we are completely hosted on the AWS cloud, we can't use Cloudflare for configuring our internal networks, and integrating with the other services. The API based integration of AWS via Terraform is another factor that allows us to automate most of our deployments and manage them programmatically
Read full review
We selected iContact because it was available at the time, and in our price range. I inherited it at the school. If it had been the program it is now back then, I would not have chosen it. At the moment, we are too busy to fully vet another program, so we are stuck with this one. It does get the job done. It is great for a small business with small needs, but once you start expanding and having more intricate needs, it does not compete with others like MailChimp
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
iContact stays the same with the number of users added or taken away. It certainly remains reliable despite increased usage, and so, can be considered scaleable in that aspect.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • All of our brand domain names (about 80 brands) are managed in there
  • Many non marketing or brand domains are also in there
  • There isn't any defined ROI because it's such a trivial and necessary service with impacts all business operations
Read full review
  • Increased Employee Efficiency - once a template is created, it is very easy to edit the content within the template with minimal or no assistance from developers.
  • Domain Reputation - if you aren't careful, it is very easy to hurt your domain reputation when using iContact. Make sure the person in charge of email marketing knows the risks of email marketing or is willing to closely work with iContact's customer service to follow best practices.
  • Increased Lead Conversion - through the use of automated email functionality, you can stay in the forefront of your customer's minds. This increases conversions by reminding customers that you are there to provide the goods or services that they may need periodically or in the future.
Read full review
ScreenShots