AppFog was a cloud-agnostic application and infrastructure management platform used to manage workloads across on-premises and third-party cloud environments. It has been discontinued.
$0
BMC FootPrints
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
BMC FootPrints is an IT service management (ITSM) solution featuring workload automation.
N/A
OnPage
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
OnPage Corporation headquartered in Waltham offers their IT alert management solution.
$16.99
quarterly per user
Pricing
AppFog (discontinued)
BMC FootPrints
OnPage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
OnPage Mobile
$13.99
per month (billed annually) per user
Enterprise Silver
$22.99
per month (billed annually) per user
Enterprise Gold
$28.99
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppFog (discontinued)
BMC FootPrints
OnPage
Free Trial
No
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
Add-ons, such as Live Call Routing and Dedicated Lines are available at an additional cost.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppFog (discontinued)
BMC FootPrints
OnPage
Features
AppFog (discontinued)
BMC FootPrints
OnPage
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
AppFog (discontinued)
6.5
2 Ratings
18% below category average
BMC FootPrints
-
Ratings
OnPage
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scalability
5.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform management overhead
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform access control
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration
6.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Development environment creation
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Development environment replication
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue recovery
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
AppFog (discontinued)
-
Ratings
BMC FootPrints
8.1
9 Ratings
2% below category average
OnPage
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service restoration
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service tools
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
AppFog (discontinued)
-
Ratings
BMC FootPrints
7.9
7 Ratings
4% below category average
OnPage
-
Ratings
Configuration mangement
00 Ratings
7.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
It was very good to use in small scale projects. Considering the high end projects with many instances and multi-platform architectures, it is better to test before the application is deployed. I think few of the questions can be general - who are the system users and what size is the application focussing on? How much resources are required? Will the application require any additional services?
BMC Footprints is so well suited to keep the documentation easy to read and find, as same as typification. You can find specific documentation for an audit so fast and export a report using the specific criteria that you need to comply with your boss or audit needs. As I told before, BMC footprints need to be more friendly to the end users because they get lost many times trying to track some ticket or typing documentation.
The best solution for OnPage is a small company with a small On-Call Team. The reason for this is because of how many it can trigger in a 30-minute time span. It's really good with us IT people as we understand the urgency of the call and we can react with the ticket. This gives the end-user peace of mind. This product would not be good for a large-scale company. It would not scale well for thousands of users.
Documentation. We try to reduce the amount of paperwork needed for staff to do their job, so by automating certain tasks, we are able to speed up the resolution process for trouble tickets.
Reporting. We'll use the reporting tool to get the number of tickets opened, response times and can go into granular reports.
Surveys. When tickets are closed, we automatically send out surveys to end users to get valuable feedback on how we did and what we can improve.
Purpose based configuration- It would be beneficial to see a more purposed based, out of the box, configuration option. For example, if you need PCI compliance, more intuitive reporting would make managing compliance much easier.
Initial design and implementation- Don't think that your experience as an IT professional will allow you to stand this system up on your own. To properly configure Footprints and set yourself up for success down the road, get Professional Services with this one.
Somewhat behind the times- Service Core is making a huge leap forward with the latest version, 12, but Asset Core is far behind. There are quite a few quirks to how the application works and how it is used.
Not really a "downside": because it works so well, any details we haven't documented from our initial setup are probably lost. It's been almost four years since our initial configuration, and I can no longer easily navigate the OnPage site because I literally haven't logged in since the initial implementation.
It has been the business decision to go with them and that is what we will do. Going back, this would have not been the choice, but nothing can be done about it now. We are stuck with this application for years to come. Wish there were other possibilities that could be done.
It's so simple to use and customize however you want. You can create new workspaces and workflows with ease, set up new users, incoming email rules, customize the layout of the forms, and even change the colors and logos. It's just very easily customizable overall. It's also really straightforward to figure out how to use, you really almost don't have to show somebody how to use it. If you just sit them down in front of it and let them look it over, they could figure it out themselves easily.
I've had no issues with the support for FootPrints. We haven't really had to use them all that much over the years, but when needed they have always been prompt and knowledgeable at dealing with any issue. I've worked with a lot of different support teams over the years, and they have been one of my favorites to work with.
Primarily because it used to have a good free tier earlier, which it does not anymore. It's simple, and things are available to use. Compared to it's competitors, it does has less features, but that kind of acts in its favor. That adds to the simplicity, and ease of use for a new user.
I was not involved in the selection process but in my opinion either SQL or Access databases would have worked just as well without the same amount of cost. These two systems would have been much easier to manage and would have tracked the same information in a less convoluted process and expense.
OnPage is the first we chose and would not change that. The ability to link to our CSM, RMM, and technicians on the road has made this the best solution. Our team is able to use the current setup to make custom alerts based on the ticket details. This allows for all of our future needs to be covered.
Eliminated the concern that on-call personnel were not notified of an issue at all or on a timely basis
The reasonable cost, ease of use and reliability reassured management that any issues arising would be handled quickly
Users disliked carrying the bulky, unreliable and battery operated pagers. Today all users carry cell phones and can easily install and manage OnPage software