Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$0
Free for 10 Users
BMC AMI DevX
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
BMC AMI DevX is an integrated software platform that provides mainframe development teams with modern Application Development and DevOps capabilities. The solution connects traditional mainframe environments with contemporary development practices through components for source code management, testing, debugging, and analytics.N/A
Typo
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Typo is a software development productivity platform that helps Engineering Leaders & Managers gain visibility, unblock the flow & drive continuous improvement. Here's what can be done with Typo: - Connect the dots across developer tools to gain visibility of their work & well-being - See where teams spend most of their efforts & align on what matters - Improve performance with recommended team goals & automated alerts on Slack Typo boasts users among 100+ Engineering…
$20
per month per user
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Starter (for up to 10 members)
$20
per month per user
Pro (for 10-250 members)
$30
per month per user
Enterprise (for 250+ members)
Custom
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.Typo works on a flat pricing system, based on the number of unique active members fetched through connected data sources. The monthly payment option can be canceled at any time. There is a 20% discount for annual billing. PayPal is used to process payments securely and most credit cards and debit cards are accepted. Invoices are provided for all subscription plans. All prices are in USD.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Considered Multiple Products
Confluence
Chose Confluence
It has great features like integration and real time collaboration with new features like AI and automation. So it gives an edge over other tools I have used in the past few years. I am sure there are a lot of features which I have not explored yet, but the features I am using …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence has a more comprehensive and flexible set of capabilities that stand out and made the decision upfront more straightforward for our team. The tools we evaluated have knowledge management, task management and collaboration capabilities, however Atlassian …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is way popular for a larger team and makes collaboration way easier. The community is strong and you get easier resolution against any request. It's integration with other Atlassian products like JIRA is an icing on the cake.
Chose Confluence
In my experience, Atlassian Confluence is at the top of these tools. I've had first hand experience with other tools and they are not at par with Atlassian Confluence. The versatility of the tool is very well recognized and utilized. Being a new user is not a probably as all …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, …
Chose Confluence
We choose Atlassian Confluence because it is the reference for managing a SAAS wiki service. And having such a solution in our company to manage the knowledge and especially the knowledge transfer is crucial.
Chose Confluence
Confluence has a more robust set of capabilities compared to Dovetail and Trello and also was already approved by our legal and compliance teams, so it tends to keep its stickiness due to that. It's also widely known in the market as a knowledge management tool. I would say it …
Chose Confluence
It's good if you're using Atlassian products, the other ones provide different connections and better UX for documentation in different ways.
Chose Confluence
Overall, Atlassian Confluence is a user-friendly tool and offers such a vast array of capabilities for project and knowledge management purposes and beyond. Other tools listed above have much more limited capabilities, although they are great tools for very specific needs and …
Chose Confluence
The main reason for moving to Atlassian Confluence was for: 1) Having 1 space that holds all of the org's documentation and knowledge sharing 2)We already used JSM and Jira so it would an organic move to have Atlassian Confluence as our main documentation hub 3) The cost …
Chose Confluence
Confluence, since it is part of the overall infrastructure of Atlassian, makes it immensely powerful internally, to build an internal knowledgebase, and is far ahead of its counterparts in Zendesk and Hubspot, which is more centered towards their customers. Confluence is just …
Chose Confluence
Sharepoint in out organisation was mostly used for collaborating on documents, which to some degree has been moved to Confluence, where the Confluence pages have replaced the specific documents.
Chose Confluence
Being a company which uses other Atlassian tools, Atlassian Confluence was a great fit; the natural and automatic linking of assets from other platforms made following paper trails seamless. Though the editing options aren't as advanced as some other options out there, it does …
Chose Confluence
We find Atlassian better for its ease of use, real time editing, integration with Jira for bug tracking, stores our security compliance documents in structured way, it is feature rich and have lots of capabilities.
Chose Confluence
In the past, I have used MediaWiki hosted locally as well as Microsoft Team Foundation Server. Wiki was simply a nightmare so all the money saved from paying for Atlassian subscriptions was lost in time while trying to use Wiki and format something properly. I haven't used …
Chose Confluence
We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is better suited for documenting and acting as a repository for information than the more immediate what is currently being worked on things that are better suited for in Jira. In my opinion, Atlassian Confluence certainly has it's short comings but it is …
Chose Confluence
We still use Atlassian Confluence only for its integration with Jira and Bitbucket. For everything else, we moved away from it and are using more modern solutions.
Chose Confluence
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and …
Chose Confluence
Freshdesk is basically for support teams, while Confluence is better for internal communication and collaborations.
Chose Confluence
The alternatives tested are based only on the whiteboarding functionality added by Confluence Whiteboard, and not the core Confluence functionality (documentation).

Chose Confluence
Again, Atlassian Confluence is efficient when paired with Jira and can do most of what a company needs it to do. But, I thi Spekit is better for "just-in-time" learning, Sharepoint is better for file hosting and organization, Asana is much better for project/task management, …
Chose Confluence
We were inclined to use Atlassian Confluence for its easy collaboration with Jira which is used for tracking project development tasks and issues. Using Atlassian Confluence, content creation became easy and even applying access control to the created content was possible. It …
BMC AMI DevX
Chose BMC AMI DevX
As per the overall dev team, most of the team has previoulsy used Devx and were satisfy with the results
Chose BMC AMI DevX
Power bi also gives all the data information about the mainframe server but it does rights codes or debugs the files. Both has other features and I think both does job in their own individual way.
Chose BMC AMI DevX
we used to use Compuware Strobe extensively to monitor performance
Chose BMC AMI DevX
We chose BMC because we already had tools from the BMC range on our development platforms and overall they are good tools.
Chose BMC AMI DevX
BMC AMI DevX wins by 33 lengths!
Chose BMC AMI DevX
The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. …
Chose BMC AMI DevX
Optim is more user friendly in how it operates, in my opinion. It's less obtuse to figure out how to extract and mask the data required compared to File-AID. Further, Optim is easier to gather related tables, by far. I do prefer using File-AID via the Topaz GUI much more than …
Typo
Chose Typo
Quality UI & instant support. Also the pricing is relatively very cost affective for us.
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.1
Ratings
9% below category average
BMC AMI DevX
-
Ratings
Typo
-
Ratings
Task Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
BMC AMI DevX
-
Ratings
Typo
-
Ratings
Chat6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
BMC AMI DevX
-
Ratings
Typo
-
Ratings
Versioning8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceBMC AMI DevXTypo
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for housing important information and resources across the organization, as it's very easy to search and find content across different teams and departments. The search function is mostly very accurate and the additional tagging with keywords also helps in the search experience. It's also good at tagging other team members, which triggers an automated email to them. Atlassian Confluence also has an extensive template library for all kinds of purposes like project management, etc., which saves time overall.
Read full review
I love these tools! However, my company has not yet transitioned from SCLM to a modern repository, and this is causing most of our developers to remain within TSO for all their development. It's been a slow adoption up to this point, but we are moving toward more modernization this year and next, so with any luck, we'll see usage pick up. Success depends on the speed at which your management is willing to move.
Read full review
Typo has great support!! They are always available
Read full review
Pros
  • Its integration with Jira for tracking development and the bugs and work linked to detailed Confluence documentation.
  • We use it extensively for writing Software Product Requirement Documents, feature specs, architecture designs, and retrospectives.
  • Our company follows compliance very seriously, so it helps in streamlining all documentation for ISO27001/27017 compliance and security-related information.
  • Its integration with various tools allows us to create flow diagrams which are often required to make client and customer understand the overall flow of interactions across various modules of the design architecture
Read full review
  • Code Pipeline: integration of MF and non-MF type of object (COBOL, Java, zosconnect...). Deployment of objects coming from inside and outside the mainframe in the same way.
  • Workbench for Eclipse: a must-have for working with Code Pipeline and the mainframe in the development context.
  • Workbench for VS Code: They started developing VSCode, and the plugin works very well. There are a lot of things to add, but it's still very good. Young developers like it!
Read full review
  • Code Analysis
  • Developer productivity
  • Developer experience
Read full review
Cons
  • You need to watch over the structure of the content yourself. if not you can get information added anywhere so nobody can find it.
  • Top search field is hard to set to only search a section of pages.
  • You really need to think your structure through before starting. a guide when setting up at the start could help in that perspective.
Read full review
  • Download source code plug-in on Azure DevOps to allow downloading prod version even if it's not in the assignment.
  • Publishing Test Results on Azure DevOps from Total Test plugin
  • Integration with DevEnterprise in Workbench and GenAI capabilities for enhance code analysis (Accross multiple programs/applications)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
This is a very good range of tools that we use daily to maintain our programs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's very intuitive for most things, making it easy to jump in and start creating pages and collaborating. This makes it ideal for onboarding new members to the team. There are a few areas that could be a little smoother, but overall it's a great experience.
Read full review
9 as it gives good smooth experience for all development tasks. Can be improved a little.
Read full review
It is one of the most effective tools I have used for my team.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
The tool is very reliable and we have had very few cases where we have had to contact support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
With one exception, we did not observe any slowdown in development activity when using the AMI DEVX Code DEBug tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The learning phase is relatively easy to implement.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
The installation teams for these products have never complained about any difficulties during the integration of this range of tools into our IT system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, integrates smoothly with other Atlassian tools, and helps everyone stay in sync. It's great for brainstorming, and project planning as well. Overall, it is a great way to boost collaboration and ensure all team members are on the same page.
Read full review
The names may have changed over the years, but anyone who has been around for a while will recognize them. For Software Configuration Management, I have used TSO/ISPF/SCLM, Panvalet, ChangeMan, Librarian, Endevor, and now Code Pipeline. All of them met the basic requirements. All of them had their advantages and disadvantages. Code Pipeline, however, stands head and shoulders above the rest in simplicity, completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and elegance.
Read full review
Typo provides better customer support and integrations. It is also more cost-effective.
Read full review
Scalability
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Merging instances has saved search time - We used to have several instances of Atlassian Confluence, which means they're separate and so can't communicate with each other. We've since merged into one instance and now with the help of the search feature can find the documents you're looking for in seconds rather than several minutes.
  • Cross linking product assets streamlines following paper trails - Being able to click on a BitBucket link from a Confluence page which then links to a JIRA ticket means you can follow paper trails really easily; seconds rather than several minutes.
Read full review
  • I can debug (expeditor) much faster and more efficiently. In fact, I was asked yesterday to run their job through Workbench Expeditor. I can also view data movement much better.
  • Code analysis lets me give a quicker explanation of what a program may do, as it provides a graphical interface showing processing and data movement.
Read full review
  • Increase in productivity
Read full review
ScreenShots

BMC AMI DevX Screenshots

Screenshot of BMC AMI DevX Workbench for VS CodeScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft BMC AMI Assistant in Visual StudioScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code Insights ft Runtime VisualizerScreenshot of BMC AMI DevX Code PipelineScreenshot of BMC AMI zAdviser Enterprise

Typo Screenshots

Screenshot of the Typo goal setting featureScreenshot of Typo's various tracking measuresScreenshot of Typo's burnout alert featureScreenshot of SDLC metrics