Avaya Infinity™ injects modern technology including AI and intelligent orchestration into existing enterprise environments, connecting the channels, insights, technologies and workflows that together create customer and employee relationships. Avaya Infinity™ is designed so that organizations can become almost infinitely adaptable to evolving customer and market demands. The Avaya Infinity™ platform aims to enable large enterprises and public sector organizations to strengthen…
N/A
Freshdesk
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Freshdesk (a product of Freshworks Inc.) is a customer service solution with enterprise capability. Freshdesk unifies channels, conversations, AI capabilities, customer insights, and advanced ticketing into the Freshdesk Command Center so agents are ready to resolve. With Freddy, People-first AI, customer service teams can take AI agents live in minutes to fully resolve complex and simple queries, get response and resolution assistance from AI copilot, and stay ahead with AI insights.…
$18
per month per user
LiveAgent
Score 8.9 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
LiveAgent is a help desk software designed to help users bring personalization to customer interactions. LiveAgent presents an omnichannel universal inbox, real-time live chat, built-in call center, and a customer service portal. It offers customer segmentation, automation, built-in CRM, and an analytics package, as well as gamification features, ultimately containing are over 180+ help desk features, and 200+ integrations. The solution boasts users among companies like BMW, Yamaha,…
We have found Freshdesk to be the most comprehensive and capable product for our needs. The UI, support, and ease of implementation were the main reasons why we have signed up for a paid account within the trial period.
We selected LiveAgent over Freshdesk due to a pricing deal LiveAgent was running at the time. If it weren't for the pricing deal, we would have picked Freshdesk due to its far superior UI and UX.
The price that LiveAgent has is just outstanding even with the features and helps us save money rather than spending loads of cash on other systems. It has also helped us better support our customers.
LiveAgent proved to be the best solution among those tested for quality/price ratio. There are no hidden costs.
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose LiveAgent
We had been using our own custom based software based on osTicket for a long time but it was getting difficult to maintain the systems. After researching for almost a month and grilling the LiveAgent team for almost a week, we managed to finalise LiveAgent. The system took some …
LiveAgent has impressed us the most out of all solutions that we've tested out. The features and plans seemed crafted to our needs so the decision was to go with LiveAgent. I can now honestly say that it was a good decision. We've recommended LiveAgent to many of our business …
Features
Avaya Infinity™
Freshdesk
LiveAgent
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Avaya Infinity™
8.1
38 Ratings
4% below category average
Freshdesk
-
Ratings
LiveAgent
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
8.136 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Validate callers
8.533 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
5.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
9.136 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
8.829 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warm transfer
8.936 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive dialing
5.728 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
9.432 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
7.927 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call scripts
6.630 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
8.835 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
9.533 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
8.132 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Avaya Infinity™
8.0
38 Ratings
4% below category average
Freshdesk
-
Ratings
LiveAgent
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
8.737 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing
8.733 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
8.136 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quality management
8.034 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
8.134 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
8.235 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
6.834 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer surveys
8.131 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
7.730 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Avaya Infinity™
-
Ratings
Freshdesk
8.4
202 Ratings
2% above category average
LiveAgent
7.7
59 Ratings
6% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.2197 Ratings
7.956 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
8.1134 Ratings
7.947 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
7.042 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
7.67 Ratings
6.838 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
00 Ratings
9.3198 Ratings
8.458 Ratings
Ticket response
00 Ratings
8.9198 Ratings
8.459 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Avaya Infinity™
-
Ratings
Freshdesk
8.4
179 Ratings
5% above category average
LiveAgent
10.0
52 Ratings
22% above category average
External knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.4162 Ratings
10.049 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.4167 Ratings
10.047 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
I would say well-suited for the everyday user, with the ability to use the products. I think it's really user-friendly in that way. The lack of education for the end users, maybe through some of our companies, makes it difficult. And the turnover.
I believe Freshdesk is well-suited for companies that manage multiple accounts, such as those in the Business Process Outsourcing industry. It has all the necessary capabilities, such as ticket management that uses omnichannel to receive ticket requests from service requests (managed internally) in the system, emails, etc. There are also several workflow automations that can be built within the platform/system. What is lacking is the API documentation, which limits the possibilities for further automations. Overall, it is a highly recommended tool for managing employee productivity and timeliness.
LiveAgent is great for companies that want to help customers with their issues. It is also great for getting sales for our company. During our chats, if a customer is interested, we like to ask for the sale. It is too easy for the customers to say no. So it is nice that with LiveAgent, they have an automatic process where the customer can enter their item and address information and it is easy for our agents to get the sale.
No prior experience with similar platforms is required to use Freshdesk. I found its interface to be quite intuitive, at least for the end user.
It's easy to connect with other platforms, so you can sync and manage data from other platforms because the integrations work correctly.
Freshdesk's technical support is quite responsive, with short and effective response times. They have easily handled my questions and issues.
It has tools for customizing automated chats, answering frequently asked questions before transferring to an agent. Its configuration is extensive and highly customizable.
Having the ability to transfer tickets or chats has proven useful when we are working with a customer who has a specific type of inquiry - perhaps a sales question or an employment request. We’ve found it helpful to have the ability to transfer the chat to the online agent best equipped to answer the inquiry so we are able to serve our customers to the highest standard and with an immediate response.
We find being able to add notes and labels to previous chats and tickets incredibly helpful in data collection and also in our ability to work as a dynamic team. By being able to sort our chats and tickets into an organized system that our company created, we can work cohesively to review old conversations for continuity, opportunities for growth, and with transparency between departments.
Calls are automatically terminated at an agent and do not allow for the agent to "manually" answer the incoming call. This is very problematic as agents are not able to prepare properly for incoming calls. In addition, agents have stepped away from their desks and forgotten to put themselves in an away status, and calls have been directed to them, and they just sit there with no agent present. This is a very undesirable feature of the system.
Password resets are extremely problematic and continuously cause problems for users. Agents are prompted to change their password upon expiry, and when they follow the instructions as outlined, it rarely works and ends up needing a full reset. The challenge questions are useless and do not work at all.
Support can be a bit challenging as there are definite language barriers that have made both explaining the problem and understanding the recommended solution difficult.
The system is sometimes unreliable and will randomly log agents out with no explanation. Agents are then advised by support to log out, clear cache, and log back in. This is not feasible in a busy call center.
You cannot divert your phone call from your local carrier to LA agent directly. You need to get a third party number which is way much costly. Also, if you get a third party number to divert your calls from a local carrier to LA, then the callers have to wait more than the usual time in order to get them connected with the Customer Support Team.
I am really not the decision maker on this subject but given the cost of the investment in Avaya, I do not see the company not renewing the use of Avaya. The new licensing model no longer requires expensive upgrades to stay current with new features added to the system and really helps with the cost of investment.
New support agents can learn the system quickly, minimizing training time and maximizing productivity from day one. Agents are more willing to use a system that is simple, reducing resistance to change and ensuring all interactions are logged (a common problem with complex systems). The platform is known for being easy to set up and customize, allowing teams (especially smaller ones) to get started with minimal technical expertise.The platform makes it easy to set and monitor Service Level Agreements (SLAs), ensuring customers get timely responses and helping managers enforce performance standards.
I am giving this rating as Live Agent is a very good software that is essential to any small or big business that provides customer support services. It gives you the possibility to manage any of your clients issues, answer questions and keep a good relationship with them by providing quick solutions.
Avaya has versatility in calling, receiving, and configuring. Being able to have notion of location, exchange of messages. we could see supplier information and configure it to our liking. as it is practicality for configuration and manual handling. Interactive and easy to learn screen. Being able to generate call reports for analysis of service in others
Freshdesk is extremely easy to use as implemented it on our own with average technical skills. A lot of the options are straightforward and Freshdesk provides easy-to-understand explanations for some of the more complex-sounding ones. We recently onboarded new specialists and they were able to learn Freshdesk with minimal training.
The initial setup, onboarding and training is easy. The system provides 2 graphic version of interfaces in black or white default colors. I would appreciate, if there were more. Some of the setup forms are not correctly resized. Overall, I'm always able to find what I am looking for in LiveAgent.
I have encountered a lot of errors in the Freshdesk, however, they tend to resolve it on priority or at least they will share the timeline by when this can be resolved. Most of the time the issue has been from the other partner's end. They take time to resolve their vendor issues and they don't have any timelines in case of developed app errors.
The reports take a lot of time to download if the time period is large. Also, the tickets take their sweet time to open and load. It is not fast as Zendesk. Only 30 tickets are visible in a single go and there isn't any option to select all. If we need to change the pages and dashboards it takes a lot of time to open.
I give it this rating because the support services of Avaya have proven to be reliable when needed. Great feedback for our queries has always been received from the support agents. 24/7 availability of support, which is very essential as our Call Center department also functions this way, therefore, the knowledge and technical support we require is always available to us.
Because I never worked with a company that responds so quickly to their customer! They are always fast at responding and very open to new ideas and quickly turning them around to include them in future releases. They walk us through when we need assistance and are very good at communicating. Overall top notch support
The one time that I contacted the customer support at LiveAgent, they were very quick to help me out and the customer support representative walked me through every thing that I needed to know to set up what I needed. Over all, the support staff at LiveAgent were perfect.
In-person training is provided to all the agents and it is very easy to learn the basics of the Freshdesk interface. Solving tickets via dashboards, replying to the guest queries in bulk via Freshdesk. The training which is a bit hard is creating the logic according to the ticket flow and intergeration.
This tool is no doubt easy to learn but in-person training is a lot better than online training. It takes time to grasp things in the online training, however, in pandemic we have done all the training online. Apart from a bit more time we haven't faced any issues with online training.
Was a fairly quick implementation for us. However, we are only doing email integration and not some of the more complex integrations that are possible. One clarification on an earlier question. I selected that Freshdesk doesn't have a given feature, but this is not true. I selected this because there wasn't a selection for I don't use the feature. This is a weakness in the survey.
Implementation was quick and when not counting a bug on our website, it took a couple hours. It was mostly done on our end or with the assistance of LiveAgent's live chat support team. We recommend to check out LiveAgent's tutorial videos on their youtube channel or browsing their knowledge base - we've almost always found answers to our queries there.
Switched from Polycom to Avaya, although polycom worked well there were too many reoccuring connectivity issues and the turn around time for solving them was also too long. Avaya has fewer connectivity problems and their support is much better too. Pricing wise they were similar so we didn't have much to lose.
Compared to Crisp, Freshdesk offers much more organization and is just much more helpful when it comes to having more than one region/team. Not that Crisp is bad, but with Freshdesk, internal communication and collaboration are much easier, which was quite important for our team to grow.
Before making the decision, we evaluated many tools, but none of them met all of our needs or the costs we could bear for them, until we found LiveAgent. The implementation process was super simple and supported by the LiveAgent support team, who are excellent!
I was not very involved with the purchase/contract (my company purchased Fresjdesk before I was brought on), but I will say that pricing per agent made it difficult to grow our support team. Additionally, we were kind of disappointed after our upgrade because it didn't solve our pain points as much as we expected.
My company had Freshdesk agents from support and success. It's generally difficult to customize permissions for different agent "roles." We were a fully distributed company, so "multiple sites" doesn't apply to us. We found Freshdesk features lacking as we grew our customer base, and adding agents wasn't easy because price steeply increases with number of agents.
Overall from a business objective standpoint, Avaya has to have had a positive impact on our Return on Investment. Its use in day-to-day operations has been beneficial to not only the company, but the business as well.
Using the Avaya soft phones supplies a business or company a way to limit expenditures on the hard phones by allowing the use of Avaya soft phones. The equipment is no longer needed, save for headsets to be used with the application itself.
Business objectives have to be just that, objectives. Economics begs for ways for a company to limit expenditures that may see little or no return. Avaya has tackled this issue and won!