Benchmark Email vs. Instapage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Benchmark Email
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Benchmark is an email marketing platform on a global mission to help businesses everywhere ignite relationships with their customers, from the company of the same name in St.Louis, Missouri.
$13
per month
Instapage
Score 9.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Instapage is a growth marketing platform that includes a builder for PPC, SEO, demand generation, A/B testing, personalization, and email automation. It is used to convert visitors into customers, engage them at every touchpoint, and optimize performance across the marketing funnel.
$99
per month 15,000 unique monthly visitors
Pricing
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Editions & Modules
Pro
Starting at $13
per month
Enterprise
Custom
Create
$99
per month 15,000 unique monthly visitors
Optimize
starting at $199
per month starting with 30,000 unique monthly visitors
Convert
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details20% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Considered Both Products
Benchmark Email
Chose Benchmark Email
In the past, I have used Getresponse. I found it very handy for Affiliate Marketing but not good enough for Corporate Marketing. I then incorporated Benchmark Email into my arsenal because it is good enough for both Affiliate Marketing and Corporate Marketing. With the upgrade …
Chose Benchmark Email
We used the free trial of many competitors, such as Mailchimp, Constant Contact, etc. Basically, Benchmark Email provided the best value for the money. The fact that we could get some economy of scale on the extended contract as well as the introduction of split a/b testing …
Chose Benchmark Email
I stated this plenty of times in my previous responses but we moved to Benchmark from Mad Mimi. Mad Mimi's feature set is extremely basic and only suited for start-ups or very small businesses. Benchmark provides enough customization to take the next step in your email …
Chose Benchmark Email
At the time of the decision, we anticipated a larger audience and a high potential cost of MailChimp. We also believed that Benchmark Email would be less complex and therefore quicker to implement and learn. Given the current needs and pricing, I believe MailChimp may be …
Chose Benchmark Email
Of the free email marketing services I tried, Benchmark could only stack up against Zoho Campaigns and Moosend. as unfortunately, Mailchimp has better signup form customization options, SendinBlue's free plan offers advanced automation and MailerLite offers advanced …
Chose Benchmark Email
Benchmark is very good for sending business email for products and services and especially for sending white papers compared to the others. But it also depends on your requirements.
Instapage
Chose Instapage
We chose Instapage for its pricing early on and also its ease of page customization. Over the years they have made a lot of updates on the marketing side but those are of little interest for our needs.
Chose Instapage
Instapage is a more complete package with an editor function, a large selection of multi-component templates, a reporting dashboard, basic SEO tools, customization functionality and excellent site speed and site performance standards. We choose Instapage because it had all …
Chose Instapage
I prefer Unbounce to Instapage even though the end result may be a nicer-looking page, the pages are not the desired outcome. Lead generation and engagement trump design, for all intents and purposes. So don't focus on the best-looking page as long as the pages are good clean …
Chose Instapage
The Instapage editor is super flexible and easy to use. You can move any element to any spot on the canvas. Instapage and Unbounce have better editors when it comes to flexibility and control. Leadpages and HubSpot offer visual drag-and-drop design but both of them are more …
Chose Instapage
We also use MailChimp's new functionality to build landing pages. It has some advantages since we use MailChimp as our email marketing system. However it is not as user-friendly as Instapage - and we only use it for certain simple campaigns that don't need us to be creative …
Chose Instapage
Reviews were good and functionality was decent for the price.
Chose Instapage
I know there are a lot of options for building quick landing pages out there, but Instapage makes it so easy to use. Think of them like Apple, the clean, friendly, easy to use option. Everyone else seems to make this a little more complex than I think it needs to be.
Chose Instapage
Instapage is easier to build pages, but does not have all the integrated functionality that SharpSpring has.
Chose Instapage
Instapage is much more user-friendly than landingi, and is much less glitchy than Wix. As such, Instapage is likely the strongest and most productive for ROI of all of the landing page software solutions. Would strongly recommend this, despite the higher price tag, it is well …
Chose Instapage
Prior to using Instapage, I had only ever used Unbounce. I wanted to see what other tools brought to the table and Instapage was the one we went with at first. I prefer Instapage's interface to Unbounce, but the underlying functionality turned out to not be the best fit for our …
Chose Instapage
Optimizely - More expensive and responsive functionality is less reliable. The WYSIWYG editor is also a little more difficult to use and many times requires custom coding for desired experience. The A/B testing tools are a little more sophisticated, but Instapage is sufficient …
Chose Instapage
I found Instapage and Leadpages similar in a lot of ways. Both are good solutions. Instapage has a little better of a drag n drop builder. A little more flexible. Leadpages actively restricted form embed code to upsell their integration packages. Not cool IMO.
Chose Instapage
Clickfunnels for more complex funnels and sales pages, Insatpage for simple opt ins, and I use dont use leadpages at all in anymore. It just didn't have the quality and I customization I was looking for.
Chose Instapage
When we first realized we needed a way to build landing pages for our ad campaigns, Instapage was one of the first products we came across. With the CMS we use, we have outside developers who help manage the back end of the site. It was not in our budget to have them create our …
Chose Instapage
Instapage is the easiest to use. It is also the cheapest. Instapage is the most flexible for customizing the mobile versions of your page (you can make changes on the mobile version without ever having it change the desktop version without you knowing). It also seems to be the …
Chose Instapage
Because of its ease of use, Instapage remains a staple in our marketing stack. While we are using native landing pages in Wordpress more and more (because we have more skill and resources) and implementing the landing page page builder in Sharpspring, if we got into a pinch …
Chose Instapage
HubSpot was terrible because it required a lot of coding experience if you wanted to work outside the given 4-5 templates. If you wanted a new template built, or to rebrand existing templates, they charged you. Very inflexible program and was very challenged by it. Our main …
Chose Instapage
I can't remember all the alternatives we looked at. It was a long time ago, and there were a lot. The number one competitor was LeadPages... and then there were a few that were WordPress plugins that we seriously looked at. We passed all of them up in favour of Instapages …
Chose Instapage
GetResponse is a little easier to use and see how pages work out across the different devices, and it is significantly more expensive than GetResponse. However, it is much more affordable than Sales Engine and Callidus Cloud Marketing Automation - which are full marketing …
Chose Instapage
We are SharpSpring clients and love many aspects of their marketing automation platform. Because their landing page features and functionality need some refining, we still use Instapage frequently to service our clients' needs. We plan to use Instapage for as long as we need to …
Chose Instapage
Used ION Interactive. Instapage is much easier to use than ION, but doesn't feel as powerful, which is great for nimble campaigns.
Chose Instapage
I've used OptimizePress as well, but I like the ease of editing even more with Instapage, and there are a lot of great templates and preloaded dummy content.
Chose Instapage
Use Optimizely - similar product, better company.
Features
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Benchmark Email
9.5
Ratings
16% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic content10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Landing pages10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
A/B testing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
List management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Benchmark Email
8.3
Ratings
7% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Benchmark Email
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Inbox Display10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Previews10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO and Conversion Optimization
Comparison of SEO and Conversion Optimization features of Product A and Product B
Benchmark Email
-
Ratings
Instapage
8.4
Ratings
34% above category average
Landing page A/B testing:00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dynamic page text replacement00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Real-time analytics dashboard00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SEO tools00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Optimization recommendations00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Small Businesses
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Zoho LandingPage
Zoho LandingPage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 8.6 out of 10
Adobe Marketo Engage
Adobe Marketo Engage
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Benchmark EmailInstapage
Likelihood to Recommend
Their free option has no time limit and accepts an email list of 2,000 contacts. That's generous considering that some similar software have free trials limited to a month or less and will allow only about 1,000 contact lists, if not less. With that 2,000 contact space available for free on Benchmark email, I can gather 2,000 leads or buyers into my email program without paying. Thus, Benchmark Email is suited for profitability, especially for a start-up business.
Read full review
If you aren't too picky about having precise control over your page designs, Instapage is a great tool that will make it easy to build and publish pages quickly. It's easy to set up and intuitive to use. It seems like that audience (prioritizes speed over precision) is their target -- for control freaks like me, it comes up a little short. The pricing is pretty good for what you get -- a super-fast path to getting campaigns out quickly so that you can test and iterate your way to profitability. It plays really well with most other tools designed for the small, scrappy startup marketing team, too.
Read full review
Pros
  • They have the option to incorporate email automation.
  • HTML is available if you want to use your own templates.
  • They give you the ability to edit some HTML on their drag and drop version.
Read full review
  • I love how easy the setup was. The drag and drop design is easy for people who don't know code but it also allows coding options for those who do.
  • Customer service has been easy to contact. They are quick with their response times and have suggested workarounds or provided videos to help fix any issues.
  • They are constantly working on improvements to the interface and additional features.
Read full review
Cons
  • Glitchy editor - powerful drag and drop features, but precise formatting can have issues.
  • Stagnant platform - few notable features or fixes over the past two years.
  • Delivery Success - anecdotal customer reports suggest high percent of emails are diverted by spam filters.
Read full review
  • Originally, we used Pardot and Instapage and I had to pull the coding from our Instapage landing pages and throw that into Pardot to get nice looking landing pages. When we transitioned to HubSpot, they took our existing pages and did this for us. But now they added an integration with Instapage and I am guessing this will solve any issues with using Instapage going forward for our website's landing pages.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I've tried all of the other landing page services on the market, and this is literally the easiest to use. I am not a designer or software developer, just a simple guy and if I can learn how to use it, anyone can. That's what won me over. Their support and pre-made templates are awesome, but the usability is what I love!
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Again, support is just awesome. I've never had any issues go over 24 hours and the people are friendly and speak English really well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
At the time of the decision, we anticipated a larger audience and a high potential cost of MailChimp. We also believed that Benchmark Email would be less complex and therefore quicker to implement and learn. Given the current needs and pricing, I believe MailChimp may be competitive and provide a more refined UI
Read full review
We also use Mailchimp's new functionality to build landing pages. It has some advantages since we use Mailchimp as our email marketing system. However it is not as user-friendly as Instapage - and we only use it for certain simple campaigns that don't need us to be creative with the landing pages. I wouldn't recommend Mailchimp as an alternative to what Instapage brings to the table!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We were able to reduce recurring costs by 20% per year by buying an extended contract plan.
  • Benchmark is more robust than our previous software, and we've been able to increase newsletter sales by about 10% per year.
  • We were able to introduce split a/b testing into our newsletter mix, as it's a native feature of Benchmark.
Read full review
  • My company was so disorganized, calculating ROI was never going to happen. However, Instapage did allow us to meet our goal, which was to acquire a specific number of leads within a month.
  • Instapage allowed me to make quick changes based on lead collection progress. When we were behind on our numbers, I could quickly make changes and A/B test different page layouts.
  • I'm not sure if they continued to use Instapage after I left the company, but it was a very helpful lead collection tool and allowed us to meet our goals.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Benchmark Email Screenshots

Screenshot of

Instapage Screenshots

Screenshot of the Instapage landing page builder for desktop and mobileScreenshot of A/B testing for layoutsScreenshot of understanding consumer behavior through heatmapsScreenshot of an example of how to get feedback from a team and collaborate on edits, in Instapage.Screenshot of some of Instapage's available integrations.