Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bluescape
Score 1.1 out of 10
N/A
Bluescape is a cloud-based, software as a service company based in Silicon Valley, CA, that provides a digital whiteboard of the same name.
$10
per month
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is a web-based Collaborative Whiteboard platform that provides teams with an infinite digital canvas for visual planning, diagramming, and workflow mapping. The platform integrates a spatial user interface with automated drawing tools and natural-language processing (NLP) to structure freeform ideas into defined project workflows and database schemas.
$10
per month per user
SAP Jam
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Jam is a social network collaboration tool with integrated collaborative processes for knowledge, learning, and HR management. SAP Jam also includes capabilities for the entire sales, marketing, and customer service lifecycles.N/A
Pricing
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Editions & Modules
Team
$10
per user, per month (10-50 licenses)
Business
$20
per user, per month (10+ licenses)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
10+ licenses
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Considered Multiple Products
Bluescape

No answer on this topic

Miro
Chose Miro
Ford uses Bluescape as the company standard. Designers use Miro because its better. We wish it was the company standard. The only nice thing about Bluescape is the ability to connect with our Bluescape monitors seamlessly.
Chose Miro
Miro is superior to Figma, and especially Bluescape. The feature sets may be pretty similar, but especially compared to Bluescape, Miro well and truly outperforms in terms of usability and user experience.
Chose Miro
MURAL - comparable, cheaper than Miro, but not as intuitive, user-friendly, and feature-rich. I would use MURAL as needed and really your top competitor. It is missing the fluid of selection.
Bluescape - is inferior in most parts but FedRAMPed
MS Whiteboard - flawed in every way …
Chose Miro
Miro has been my favorite as opposed to Bluescape and Asana. Bluescape felt a bit outdated and not as smooth to use. Asana did not have the extent of flexibility or features for the purposes we wanted.
Chose Miro
Miro offers more features and a better overall experience than Bluescape does. While Microsoft 365 allows for real-time interaction, only Miro provides the open-ended whiteboard format.
Chose Miro
Everything about Miro is better. Bluescape had limited object tools, always froze, was jittery when you tried to move things around, and overall was disliked by everyone in the company. When one group began using Miro, everyone else wanted to use it too, which ultimately led …
Chose Miro
far much better no bugs, faster, more better features
Chose Miro
Easy of use, login process, show colloboations, templates availability, tools that we can use, easy information sharing, relatively faster loading, awareness of tool, help availbility, browser support and app availability on different OS, responsiveness of product, popularity …
Chose Miro
I find Miro to be a superior tool, other tools I have used became unresponsive or too slow to be effective in the roles and jobs I needed them to do. I am currently working in a Miro board with over 1000 discrete elements and it loads fast, I can maneuver and work with the …
Chose Miro
Miro was selected as my org's collaboration solution. Each of the software listed above has its own pros and cons. Miro stacks up quite well as far as collaboration and whiteboard functions are considered.
Chose Miro
TERRIBLE, lagging Issues, formating, terrible updates. I'm glad I dont have to use It anymore
SAP Jam

No answer on this topic

Features
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Bluescape
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.8
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Search00 Ratings00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Bluescape
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.0
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Chat00 Ratings00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings00 Ratings9.23 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings00 Ratings9.23 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings00 Ratings6.53 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Bluescape
-
Ratings
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Jam
7.0
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(5 ratings)
9.0
(6322 ratings)
8.9
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(195 ratings)
4.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(701 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(68 ratings)
2.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
3.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3661 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(16 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4003 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BluescapeMiroSAP Jam
Likelihood to Recommend
Bluescape
This digital version of a pin-up space is absolutely an improvement to my workflow. The input is so robust. What you do with it is where the magic happens. This program is best suited for team collaboration. It helps to discuss how/where the team will contribute information to it--whether that is discussing the templates or a plan of action. Otherwise, the workspace can tend to get messy. I like the idea of having a presentation mode, where some of the markups could be hidden. The idea of a working session with consultants or clients sounds appealing, but at the same time, there is a desire for a cleaned up, clear shareout.
Read full review
Miro
We have used it mostly for documenting our solution, roadmap and as a single source of truth.. It has been very helpful for product management, bridging the gap between developers, solution architects, business teams and compliance. I think Miro board is well suited for product documentation and product management. The talk tracks help us transmit information with an additional layer of understanding. Not sure about scenarios where it is less appropriate. Our use cases are well covered.
Read full review
SAP
When you need to create a private, secure space for individuals to collaborate or work on a project together, SAP Jam does a great job at bringing people together and giving them a space to work together in. There are also great ways to provide learning opportunities (including sharing webinars or other educational content)
Read full review
Pros
Bluescape
  • Allows for a high volume of images and sketches to be put into the canvas
  • Lets you drop in text, freehand sketching, and shapes quick and easy
  • Can connect images and texts together using connectors, which can be customized
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
SAP
  • Easy to setup.
  • Template-based group creation.
  • Permissions are either inherited or set at the group-level by group owners.
Read full review
Cons
Bluescape
  • You can use Zoom with Bluescape but it requires solid bandwidth and memory by users.
  • A breadcrumb trail would be nice to watch students performance.
  • I would like individual user analytics for each of my students to see where they’ve been and what contributions each has made.
Read full review
Miro
  • It looks somewhat hokey at times and can come off as a little cartoony.
  • Its singular focus can often be its drawback, given that it has multiple use cases, but those are often not explored with its core features.
  • It could be a bit more complex, which somewhat ties into my above point.
Read full review
SAP
  • Multiple selection limitations
  • Error proofing in wrong command
  • Multiple time confirmation
  • Multiple time checkbox
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
Read full review
SAP
We are moving toward other platforms that are meant more for virtual community, like Higher Logic. The customer support at SAP Jam is also lacking.
Read full review
Usability
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
Overall it is very intuitive and easy to use. We have new members of the team join all the time and they are able to pick it up quickly and learn it very easily, so that is the mark of a good software product. And although it is so freeform, the library of templates give great starting points and help with ideas to build the boards from scratch.
Read full review
SAP
It's an integrated platform that brings together a lot of different people from across the association to work on shared projects, etc. Given the various roles people play and the varying skill sets they bring to the table, the platform is fairly intuitive to use and easy to navigate around
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Performance
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
SAP
We have to submit requests multiple times to get a response and it often feels like they go into a black hole. Because we don't have anyone in house really supporting the back-end of the platform, we rely on SAP Jam's support and development teams to help solve problems and improve the platform for us.
Read full review
Online Training
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Bluescape
We have Workware installed on different computers in our office that were supposed to be great for presentation but we had issues after a user connected their laptop then they no longer had access to our server. If they had files they needed for the presentation they had to save them to their desktop to make sure they were accessible.
Read full review
Miro
Some examples of collaboration software we looked into were FigJam, Mural, and Mermaid. While all three of them are excellent at what they do, either collaboration or diagramming, Miro finds the proper compromise between functionality and usability. FigJam is very user-friendly and convenient for collaboration; nevertheless, it lacks the ability to structure. Mural can be used effectively for workshops, but it is not as straightforward as other tools commonly used. Mermaid is great for creating code diagrams, but it cannot be used for team collaboration. This is why Miro was chosen for our use case.
Read full review
SAP
We utilize many products in the SAP universe of solutions. Not only was JAM feature-rich and matched our company needs, but the tight integration with our other SAP product lines makes admin as well as usability seamless. While other competitors to JAM offer more features that rely on real-time, most of our use cases were asynchronous.
Read full review
Scalability
Bluescape
No answers on this topic
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Bluescape
  • Especially in a remote work environment, Bluescape helps us continue collaborating without missing a beat
Read full review
Miro
  • This is one of those platforms where the entire team needs to be bought into it, or it doesn't function as intended. Once we achieved that, it's been a wonderful tool for brainstorming and project management internally.
  • Surprisingly, Miro has not allowed us to reduce software; however, it's a worthwhile addition to our tech stack.
  • Our team has Miro boards bookmarked, and we know exactly where to go when we have ideas or things that we want to add. It's great to know that we will receive notifications when that happens.
Read full review
SAP
  • Automation in process
  • Ease of communication
  • Lack of change notification
  • Lack of multiple selection search
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bluescape Screenshots

Screenshot of Bluescape Collaborative Workspace

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.