Bonita is an open-source business process and workflow management platform created by the French National Institute for Research in Computer Science. It is available as a free community edition or as a commercial subscription product.
N/A
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Databricks offers the Databricks Lakehouse Platform (formerly the Unified Analytics Platform), a data science platform and Apache Spark cluster manager. The Databricks Unified Data Service provides a platform for data pipelines, data lakes, and data platforms.
$0.07
Per DBU
OpenText Magellan
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Bonita Platform
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$0.07
Per DBU
Premium
$0.10
Per DBU
Enterprise
$0.13
Per DBU
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bonita Platform
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bonita Platform
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
OpenText Magellan
Features
Bonita Platform
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
OpenText Magellan
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
6.4
43 Ratings
20% below category average
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
5.540 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.740 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
7.7
53 Ratings
8% below category average
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Process designer
9.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
6.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
8.242 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
6.440 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
6.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form builder
8.148 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
6.948 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
5.9
24 Ratings
34% below category average
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
5.924 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
6.8
34 Ratings
18% below category average
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Content management
6.834 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
-
Ratings
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
-
Ratings
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Bonita Platform
-
Ratings
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Well suited for low code/no code applications centered around approval flows. It has built-in task management for users to see their pending actions, comments, statuses, etc. It has a very nice design for process flows. Less appropriate may be for generic type applications with complex screens and logic within those screens that need a lot of data to process.
Medium to Large data throughput shops will benefit the most from Databricks Spark processing. Smaller use cases may find the barrier to entry a bit too high for casual use cases. Some of the overhead to kicking off a Spark compute job can actually lead to your workloads taking longer, but past a certain point the performance returns cannot be beat.
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
Bonita seems particularly suited for processes requiring a great deal of human interaction. Its user model allows you to control access to business processes in a fine-grained way. This allows for business processes to move smoothly between users and services as the process advances.
The definition and usage of custom forms from the latest version of Bonita seems particularly powerful. It allows for a thorough customization of the look-and-feel and does not require complex developments.
The web interface and administration section have greatly improved in the latest versions. Installation and configuration of processes has become more flexible and more structured. The administration section gives a good view on failed processes, allowing to analyse problems in an efficient way.
There is a learning curve beyond the boot camps that needs to be addressed with more structured curriculum.
The full stack technologies are industry standard, but these [are] challenging to learn and could use a learning path and orientation. There's probably opportunity for third-parties here to help with learning and adoption.
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
Bonita Platform has allowed us to develop GUI relatively fast using its UI Designer while being able to seamlessly integrate our business logic in Java in a BPMN2 process diagram. It gives a nice productivity boost but still requires programming know-how to be able to deliver the final solution to your business problems.
Because it is an amazing platform for designing experiments and delivering a deep dive analysis that requires execution of highly complex queries, as well as it allows to share the information and insights across the company with their shared workspaces, while keeping it secured.
in terms of graph generation and interaction it could improve their UI and UX
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
Engine itself is efficient enough for most cases I dealt with. It can also be extended by clustering. I have done performance tests with JMeter and only managed to induce the crash of... JMeter. If there are efficiency issues they usually concern bad design/implementation of created apps or bottlenecks in integrated systems. Although I have met two cases with efficiency loss.
1. Java 7 related PermGen saturation caused by big number of installed apps (there is no jar dependency reusal between apps option).
2. Big number of waiting event handlers in processes stresses the database.
One of the best customer and technology support that I have ever experienced in my career. You pay for what you get and you get the Rolls Royce. It reminds me of the customer support of SAS in the 2000s when the tools were reaching some limits and their engineer wanted to know more about what we were doing, long before "data science" was even a name. Databricks truly embraces the partnership with their customer and help them on any given challenge.
The most important differentiating factor for Databricks Lakehouse Platform from these other platforms is support for ACID transactions and the time travel feature. Also, native integration with managed MLflow is a plus. EMR, Cloudera, and Hortonworks are not as optimized when it comes to Spark Job Execution. Other platforms need to be self-managed, which is another huge hassle.
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
Respect of BPMN standard over the long term. Good enhancements by Bonitasoft for new use cases, for example the introduction of a real form editor even if it has been technically difficult to manage. Once done though, we have far greater possibility of human interaction.
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.