CloudApper SalesQ vs. Paymo

CloudApper SalesQ is best utilized in managing sales teams in clusters of around 50. It can be classified as a sales management app, rather than a CRM. Data analysis-dependent companies who want to deduce how teams are performing can take advantage of its remote data collection. Extremely large organizations are better off using Salesforce.

Beautiful interface throughout, easy setup, most natural progressions are fluid and easy to use. Browser functionality allows us to use it cross-platform. Very reasonable pricing model as well. We have had a little trouble using Paymo for the entire creative process to have proofs reviewed and approved. Also, have to use external forms to have work submitted from campus.

Incentivized

• Provides an informative dashboard
• It's simple and intuitive enough to use on your own.
• It is possible to utilize it directly from smartphones.

• The ability to code exactly what time I worked on a project enables me to bill clients more accurately and within different minimums, which besides more accurately tracking time, this has been extremely helpful as I negotiate contracts for services and offer different deals with potential clients. Some are billed to the minute, some in 15-minute minimums, and some in 20-minute blocks.
• The live reports are great, showing time spent in the minimums that I've set, while also including as much detail as I wish to share.
• I've now started just writing my notes into the tracker, which are then carried into the live reports - this eases my needing to send logs to clients, as well as helping me to keep projects on track.

Incentivized

• Is a bit rough on the edges
• Integration is a work in progress
• Some features are yet to come

• It would be really helpful if on the timer tool, they asked you to switch projects when you stop the timer, so it could fill that time in right away for you.
• I never use the 'My Tasks' because I don't fully understand how to integrate it to be useful to what our purposes are in Paymo. Some Youtube tutorials might be helpful

Incentivized

It is a complete, a bit overambitious app but with many features that are needed. I didn't need most of the features but managed to make the most of the two I was using. Also, I think it is a well-rounded app and I am considering moving some team collab there.

Incentivized

Good! Fast, excellent, speedy responses. They always wanted to know why and how they could improve on something (good on receiving feedback, too). Not that they were much needed, but my limited experience with them is good; they were really keen to understand what the problem was really about and how they could help with it.

Incentivized

Salesforce has sleek UI and UX and also has a plethora of robust features. However, it is quite expensive to adopt and develop for the average user and is also quite cumbersome. CloudApper SalesQ is quite affordable and simple, and gets the job done. It is great for monitoring sales teams and managing their performance.

We still use Trello and Slack, but Basecamp and HubSpot are too much for our operation to manage or integrate. Paymo is missing some of the tracking features of HubSpot and isn't as universally used as Basecamp but we've been with them for 8 years and they seem to know what matters most to their user base

Incentivized

• Reps can be Managed through phones
• look over sales operations activities like vendor acquisition

• Gives me more accurate time that I've spent on projects compared to older methods I've used.
• Has data that I can pull together, for example my boss wanted to know the percentage of time I'd spent working on projects for one client compared to everything else - I was able to give them an accurate percentage.
• Forces you to stay on top of jobs, which can lengthen the time to complete something

Incentivized