Cornerstone Galaxy is a cloud-based application for talent management. Cornerstone offers suites for recruiting, training, performance monitoring and planning, learning, and HR data management. It is scaled for enterprises.
N/A
SeekOut
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
SeekOut is a people-first platform that helps organizations hire, grow, and retain great talent. They aim to empower companies with a clear picture of their current and future talent by combining internal and external data backed by actionable analytics.
N/A
Pricing
Cornerstone Galaxy
SeekOut
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cornerstone Galaxy
SeekOut
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cornerstone Galaxy
SeekOut
Features
Cornerstone Galaxy
SeekOut
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
134 Ratings
11% below category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.569 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
5.7116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
6.3127 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.4
115 Ratings
14% above category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.596 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
8.099 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.0107 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.595 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.0110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
8.5
122 Ratings
21% above category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.594 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.581 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
9.070 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
9.082 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
9.097 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.064 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.094 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.086 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.083 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.3116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
6.5
58 Ratings
4% below category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
5.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
8.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
5.8
67 Ratings
20% below category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
7.045 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
8.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.040 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
5.043 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.040 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
6.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
6.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
4.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
5.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
4.560 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
3.061 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.556 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
3.564 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy
7.4
191 Ratings
5% above category average
SeekOut
-
Ratings
Course authoring
7.7141 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
7.4189 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
8.0176 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning content
7.2151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
6.5138 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
6.0172 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
8.0185 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
7.8166 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
8.0188 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
7.6187 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social learning
6.7119 Ratings
00 Ratings
Talent Intelligence
Comparison of Talent Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cornerstone Galaxy is a good solution for larger companies that focus on training and want to offer a variety of options to their employees and departments. It is highly customizable. It does require a tech savvy team to set-up, and maintain. This is not a set-it-and-forget-it system. From an LMS perspective, it wouldn't be my top choice for employees who only need a mobile-friendly approach.
Diversity teams use this, and powerfilters are very helpful. When looking for volume, Seek out other terms to find relevant profiles well. For example, it might map other candidates with similar terms at the end of the pool search. Also, the bias reducer filter helps make sure there is less bias towards a hiring manager and the recruiters.
Ability to provide multiple customizable access roles from general end user to full system admin and anything in between
Powerful reporting system in the LMS to track a plethora of data points within the platform (user data, training information, transcript information)
Great options to customize the look and feel of your "home page" to best meet your company's needs and goals.
Ability to customize the transcript view for learners (i.e. when Completed training will move to their Archived transcript, what to do with Inactive training on transcripts)
Sometimes finding the right answer to your support question can be a bit more difficult than it should be.
I would like to see more OSHA related courses.
At times, the administrative interface seems to need to be updated, but the tradeoff honestly might be the absolute rock-solid stability of the platform.
SeekOut needs better updates to the backend repository, LI. Several times, when pulled through, SeekOut pulled up LI profiles that were not up to date compared to when searched on LI directly.
It would be helpful to have better/more updated phone information. As noted in the previous screen, approx. 50% of phone contact information is spot-on, however capturing more up to date information for phone would be helpful.
Although picky, having different colors for screens to highlight areas would be helpful. Working late at night, which many times do, the screens are similar in color and brightness, and it would be beneficial to have more distinguishment in colors or brightness so as not to blend.
As long as pricing stays reasonable, we will likely stay with Cornerstone for at least one more contract renewal. It would be a large task to migrate all of our content to a new system. However, the LMS landscape is diversifying with new startups that are showing some real innovation.
This platform tends to give you applicants who are not necessarily looking for new opportunities. I have had people be upset that I contacted them or sought them out on LinkedIn. This can be troublesome when the only thing I am trying to do is find qualified applicants. I need active people, who dont mind a cold call
Easy to use, easy to learn, lots of support during the learning process. There are a few parts of the system we don't use and I'm hesitant to begin using because other clients have said they're difficult and cumbersome (certifications) or outdated (libraries)
Using SeekOut is very intuitive. Lots of multi-select boxes, toggle switches, and keyword boxes. If you have any experience with LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut is not a far jump in learning how to use it effectively. I will say that adding candidates to projects doesn't necessarily feel like an intuitive process after you've been redirected to LinkedIn to look at a candidate's profile
I haven't really had any major availability problems. The service is practically impeccable but it is true that at times, due to server and latency problems, the application has been slower. But these have been specific issues that have resolved themselves.
I haven't seen many issues at all with load times. Sometimes learning assignments will take longer then expected but it is still reasonable. They have taken great effort over the last couple years to speed things up like reports and search results so I expect that effort to continue in the coming year.
Its always important to have support when you are facing problems and when you are the main admin of the organization. Cornerstone Support is very supporting when you have not found the answer in the help guide. its very useful to have a team support to guide you.
We have not needed to get in touch with the support team during our time using SeekOut because someone else in our company takes care of that matter. Overall, we have been very satisfied with the ease of use and self-sufficiency of SeekOut and have not found the need to contact the support team.
we use also to admin all our training in person events and sessions. Its easy to admin this kind of trainings and automatize some processes we have. Also de user experience and the integration with other systems helps to the employees to use more. All modules integrated oriented to develop people is the principal reason to have CSOD. The training administration is very complete and allows to automate many processes.
The online modules are pretty good. You can access them at any time, which we have done. You learn a lot in the beginning, but having the ability to retake short lessons when you are working on those items was very helpful.
We had an online tarining with all the recruiters. The trainer was very good, and enthusiast as well. He explained everything very detailed, showed how to search which kind of functions are in Seekout. He showed the program by using examples of search. We could ask questions at the end, and he told that we can contact him any time.
The implementation was pretty difficult. We felt they (Cornerstone) didn’t properly allocate the resources to complete our implementation in the timetable we wanted.
For example, we worked on Workday and SSO integrations - work that we had specifically contracted for in advance. When we were ready to work on that project, they didn’t have the people ready to help us, so it took a lot longer than necessary. That was my biggest pain point.
The implementation approach we went with was a self-led implementation. We would speak to the implementation manager once per week, and self-trained. We met with implementation manager to discuss issues, review things that we’d learned for 1 hour. We found that wasn’t enough. Other things would come up outside that one hour window that we couldn’t get answers to. We didn’t have anyone to ask about those things and we had to wait to ask during our weekly meeting.
The advantage of the self-led implementation approach was that it was really inexpensive – significantly less than the implementation cost for the other systems that we looked at. I also liked that we could pace ourselves. There were however big roadblocks. We would have to make sure the right resources were available. We had an implementation/project manager with a lot of experience and felt that the person was knowledgeable but missed on a few things.
In hindsight, I would still go with the self-led implementation, but knowing what I know now, I would ask for the integration person to be available more. I would work that into the contract. With single sign-on, we needed deep linking to build direct links through a Single Sign-On tool, e.g. when someone gets an email, it directs them to training. But it has to go through SSO to get them to the correct link. Deep linking wasn’t turned on in our system and they had to activate it. We encountered little things like that – sequencing pre-requisites which were problematic. We tried to troubleshoot ourselves.
I recommend you consider contracting for some extra implementation hours and determine when they are going to be available. Work it into the contract that you have the ability to call tech support during implementation. In addition to weekly implementation meetings, they have technical webexes – 4 every week, but 2 didn’t apply to us – one as we were using SSO. The challenge is they were not always relevant – we had specific questions that didn’t fall into those categories
Once the licenses were purchased we were sent an email to activate our account. From there we had full access to the platform and a training was set up. Since I had used SeekOut previously I understood the dynamics of the platform and was able to use it instantly.
The user experience is a lot better than using SumTotal as an admin CSOD makes working easy. Without having workarounds. Reporting is a lot better than both platforms. Reporting in CSOD is complex however easy to manage and create when you understand the data points collected
We selected SeekOut as an extra level of sourcing and the intention was not to use LI anymore. They do not stack up because we are able to DM candidates, or they can message us asking questions, set up screens, send resumes, etc. You can not do that on SeekOut.
It is important to be familiar with the terms and annual increases in licenses and other aspects of the contract. I recommend analyzing this from the beginning and the permanence is relevant because Cornerstone updates its modules and brings out new features that may allow you to leave a module to acquire another
As I have said before, I have no doubt that the services of the Cornerstone sales people were very good. In particular, our salesperson spent a lot of time in contact with us to make the process go smoothly. Perhaps being a large company in some cases the times were slowed down but it is something normal to take into account.