datapine is a business intelligence and and data visualization solution that is focused on self-service. Its interface for data analysis and discovery combines interactive dashboards to deliver insights across and beyond the user’s organization. No coding skills are required. datapine helps businesses monitor KPIs and their artificial algorithms learn from the user’s data and inform them as soon as something…
$249
per month
OpenText Magellan
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Sigma
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Sigma Computing headquartered in San Francisco provides a suite of data services such as code free data modeling, data search and explorating, and related BI and data visualization services.
N/A
Pricing
datapine
OpenText Magellan
Sigma Computing
Editions & Modules
Basic
$249
per installation
Professional
$499
per installation
Premium
$769
per installation
datapine Server
$999
per installation
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
datapine
OpenText Magellan
Sigma
Free Trial
Yes
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$2,000 per installation
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Prices are per month.
—
Contact us for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
datapine
OpenText Magellan
Sigma Computing
Features
datapine
OpenText Magellan
Sigma Computing
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
datapine
9.9
3 Ratings
19% above category average
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Sigma Computing
7.7
163 Ratings
6% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
9.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.1104 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
9.93 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
9.3161 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
7.8133 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
datapine
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Sigma Computing
7.6
166 Ratings
5% below category average
Drill-down analysis
10.03 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
8.2155 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
10.03 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
7.1163 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
10.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
7.8162 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
datapine
10.0
3 Ratings
20% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Sigma Computing
7.7
156 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web
10.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
7.7103 Ratings
Publish to PDF
9.93 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
7.8130 Ratings
Report Versioning
10.03 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
7.3120 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
9.93 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
7.9132 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.868 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Our team wanted a software that can handle our data in a cloud setting and connect our data sources easily. The values that we got from Datapine cannot be compared with other any other tools Because datapine always focus on the best possible user experience and can certainly compete with other, even bigger softwares in the market.
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
We were able to set up client-facing embedded reports with ease and security. The interface is not difficult to learn, although we may not be aware of or lack the necessary expertise to utilize more advanced features that would likely benefit us.
Sigma Computing does not allow custom ordering of pivot fields in pivot tables easily
Sigma Computing lacks functionality for creating tables or sections that dynamically adjust to the browser window's height while maintaining a fixed height textbox at the bottom
Sigma Computing does not provide straightforward options for formatting totals in tables, such as renaming 'Total' to 'Average', 'Team Total', etc
Sigma Computing does not support searching by individual tab names within a workbook
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
Sigma has helped us a lot and has become an integral part of our daily workflow. It would be difficult to switch to another platform and have to rebuild the numerous metrics and performance reports that we have already established
With the help of Datapine i can easily share and send my all reports at a specific time and without any worry about the updates or accuracy of information. The tool is really one of the best tool available in the market.
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
It has a clean and modern interface. However, it is not completely intuitive. I think it would be better and easier to navigate with more Windows style drop down menus and/or tabls. There is a significant learning curve, but that may be due in part to the technical nature of this type of software tool.
They are very friendly and informative. They are quick in resolving our queries and help us understand very minute things as well. They are quick in creating feature tickets based on our custom requirements, and they would also create a bug ticket if there is any discrepancy and get that checked on time.
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
With Looker, to be effective, a substantial amount of coding & modeling needs to happen in LookML. Being another language to learn, users have to context switch again from at a minimum either SQL or Python into LookML. The concept of being able to source control, code review, and deploy your models is a plus though.
Tableau is the gold standard for data visualization, no question. Power users will be able to create dazzling content that Sigma won't necessarily be able to easily match. However, since development usually happens via an extract, helping other users troubleshoot is an arduous process. Trying to re-do or un-do all the transformations and calculations that cause a certain number is very difficult.
With Sigma, all the queries happen directly against Snowflake and you can see the query logs. The data modeling happens right in a tabular, spreadsheet-like manner, so within only a few minutes, substantial transformations can happen, with visualizations just a few more clicks away.
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.
Monitoring health of cloud platform has allowed the company to anticipate issues before they affect customers – Sigma prompted us building a canary monitoring process that provides customer container health.
Customer success has used an activity report to discover customers running runaway processes that they were unaware of, creating an alert to contact the customer and prevent an embarrassing situation.
Customer success uses the activity report to prompt conversations regarding increases or declines in behavior that led to increasing contract limits or addressing churn concerns.