Devart ODBC Driver vs. Vena vs. Workday Adaptive Planning

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Devart ODBC Driver
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Devart ODBC Driver for Oracle provides a high-performance and feature-rich connectivity solution for ODBC-based applications to access Oracle databases from Windows, both 32-bit and 64-bit. Its full support for standard ODBC API functions and data types implemented in their driver makes the interaction of database applications with Oracle faster, easier and handy.
$349.95
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score 7.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning streamlines planning workflows, using AI and real-time data integration to improve collaboration and provide predictive forecasts for better strategic analysis.N/A
Pricing
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Editions & Modules
Desktop Perpetual
$349.95
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Considered Multiple Products
Devart ODBC Driver

No answer on this topic

Vena
Chose Vena
Honestly and in evaluation with other tools , Vena outperformed competitors like Workday Adaptive Planning ,because it offers centralized financial planning with strong automation while still keeping Excel at the core , speeding up the reporting cycles and achieving wider …
Chose Vena
We went with Vena as the alternatives felt like everything was contained in the box, and would have required more IT department assistance than we had bandwidth for.
Chose Vena
we liked that Vena was fully integrated into Excel and we were already doing all our manual work within excel and creating all our reports and templates so we thought that only made sense to use Vena as it was most comfortable for us
Chose Vena
We really like the features that Vena provides working Excel. the ability for the planning tool to have familiarity for various members throughout the organization was what ultimately led us to choosing Vena. Both tools were very impressive when demoing and felt like either …
Chose Vena
Adaptive was not Excel-friendly, very slow, and crashed often. We have attempted to fix our build prior to switching to Vena for several months, and ultimately made the decision that switching was the better approach after having a wonderful sales demo presentation with the …
Chose Vena
Ultimately we decided on Vena because of the Excel interface which we knew would improve adoption. We also like the platform agnostic integration and easy-to-use web interface. The OLAP cube was also appealing to allow for a variety of pivoted reports.
Chose Vena
Vena allowed for the most customization that made everything easy for us with our complicated system of managing allocations across products and time by employees.
Chose Vena
Vena is much faster than other such software which is available in market. If we talking about pricing $$$ so Vena is affordable to smaller companies also. it's help us quicker integrations with other software and User Interface is much better than other software. Vena gives …
Chose Vena
Vena is much more flexible than Adaptive. We deeply evaluated Adaptive, looking at database structures, workflows, user interfaces, reporting. While Adaptive is strong in some areas (predictive forecasting using AI etc..) it was not able to meet our needs with complex business …
Chose Vena
Vena Solutions is far beyond Yardi Voyager because Vena can put a custom report together in a few minutes instead of hours. You don't have to do a lot of drilling to get the details of the amount and you can see all the history of the amount by click on the cell. It makes the …
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because it offered the following features: API connection with many of our tools (Power BI, Sage Intacct, Salesforce), worked well with both MAC and PC, ability to set up workflows with automated emails, ability to set up permissions by multiple dimensions, …
Chose Vena
The decision to go with Vena was based mostly on flexibility.
Chose Vena
When looking at other tools, we were concerned about end user adoption and Vena stood out because of the use of Excel. It is a familiar format and provides almost endless flexibility when considering business processes that can be added. At first, Adapative was a front runner …
Chose Vena
Prophix is powerful, and structures data on the back-end in a very similar way with multiple data models, and I have used it before. But the learning curve is steep. Building complex rules, e.g. for a union personnel model, was much harder than designing the same logic in …
Chose Vena
I really like Vena for organizations with smaller finance teams. Excel is at the heart of Vena so there is a less new technology for them to learn. All three solutions have strengths that make them appropriate for specific organizations.
Chose Vena
Vena doesn't require technical knowledge to build reports, so maintenance of the system can be maintained by the finance team.
Chose Vena
Vena is much more user-friendly in my experience, especially for non-accounting employees.
Chose Vena
We went with Vena because of its ease of use, i.e. the ease in which the staff was able to adapt the system and use it. We went with Vena because they were very reasonably priced - a huge consideration for a nonprofit like mine. And, we went with Vena because I am able to …
Chose Vena
At the end of the day, Vena offered great value without having to involve IT. It was an easy to implement system for us. We could query the data from our financial system and created a process to send it to Vena using Box and Microsoft Power Automation (formerly Flow). Because …
Chose Vena
Clearly a better fit for our company from a culture perspective. Adaptive sales team was super pushy and not a good fit for us. Also, the system would have LET us work in Excel, but that was not its main interface.
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because it was moldable to our disparate systems. Ideally I'd have something sit natively within our ERP. But since our data points come from places outside of the ERP we needed something we could quickly and easily leverage and use Excel as our basis because …
Chose Vena
We were using Dynamic Budgets before we moved over to Vena and researched many, many, many other products before settling on Vena in the end. One of the things that quickly knocked out other vendors was our unique fiscal calendar. We have 13 periods (4 weeks each) and that …
Workday Adaptive Planning
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
After researching several CPM products, Adaptive and Prophix actually both met our needs quite well. The Adaptive Sales & Design Team went above and beyond in the early stages of exploring whether Adaptive could meet some of our very specific needs. Adaptive's customer …
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Adaptive was more flexible, able to be maintained without heavy IT involvement, cost effective, had no additional hardware requirements, and since it is a cloud platform, updates are automatic.
Features
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
10.0
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Version control tools10.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test data generation10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance optimization tools10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Schema maintenance10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database change management10.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
User management10.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database security10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database status reporting10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change management10.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
175 Ratings
5% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
3 Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.1109 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.1156 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.6166 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
289 Ratings
3% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
7.6
3 Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.4276 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.3276 Ratings6.53 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.4107 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.0246 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
231 Ratings
1% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.6130 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.1169 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.1193 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.1171 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
160 Ratings
11% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
7.7
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.7143 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.6117 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.5133 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.071 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
279 Ratings
0% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.1
3 Ratings
3% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.1264 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.4264 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.4265 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.5128 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.5205 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
142 Ratings
2% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
7.6
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.9137 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.5122 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
349 Ratings
4% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
194 Ratings
1% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.6316 Ratings7.7180 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.7335 Ratings8.5191 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.6323 Ratings8.0186 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.9289 Ratings8.0175 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.2325 Ratings8.0191 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
302 Ratings
7% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
6.9
159 Ratings
12% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.4262 Ratings6.7119 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.9195 Ratings7.080 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.8178 Ratings7.293 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.6175 Ratings6.272 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.9125 Ratings6.742 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.3224 Ratings7.2106 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.4264 Ratings7.2133 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
329 Ratings
5% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
7.6
182 Ratings
3% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.4296 Ratings8.1160 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.4308 Ratings8.4176 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.0318 Ratings7.1176 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.5248 Ratings7.9153 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.199 Ratings6.332 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
261 Ratings
3% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.1
151 Ratings
0% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.2222 Ratings8.2133 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.1168 Ratings8.6110 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.5195 Ratings7.8124 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.0208 Ratings8.1125 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.2190 Ratings8.4107 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.9147 Ratings7.775 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Devart ODBC Driver
-
Ratings
Vena
8.1
319 Ratings
0% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
6.8
172 Ratings
17% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.8259 Ratings7.0135 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.0299 Ratings8.0165 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.6236 Ratings5.3123 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Small Businesses
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.6 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(3 ratings)
8.5
(346 ratings)
7.6
(223 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(26 ratings)
10.0
(46 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(38 ratings)
7.6
(129 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(10 ratings)
9.0
(12 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(9 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(106 ratings)
8.2
(33 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
7.3
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(10 ratings)
8.6
(27 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
7.3
(8 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(9 ratings)
8.2
(12 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
6.4
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Devart ODBC DriverVenaWorkday Adaptive Planning
Likelihood to Recommend
Devart
It is appropriate in all scenarios. It is perfect to connect with the database. Actually, nothing to dislike in functionality and performance. It is stand-alone and doesn't need any additional application to be installed.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Using Vena's tools for budgeting, forecasting, and budget variance reports, I have saved hundreds of hours of work, and that increases every year. Vena is perfect when there is a single report template that needs to go to every manager with their own department's data - rather than manually copying and pasting each of them, I create a template in Vena and assign security settings to show each manager only their data. No individual emailing needed either; I just let everyone know their report is in Vena. Days of work are now reduced to hours. When doing forecasting, all the budget and actual data is easily available and can be referenced by other reports. Vena eliminates needing to keep multiple Excel sheets in sync and manually updating each one when a change is made. All I need to do is click Refresh, and it's done.
Read full review
Workday
It's well suited to any business where you have defined inputs, a layer of structured calculations and a defined output. In other words, any business situation! We use it in a law firm setting where it enables us to import staff plans, assign targets to each individual, thereby generating a revenue forecast linked to business capacity. From there, global assumptions determine staff and direct costs, with the user overlaying discretionary costs to arrive at a final P&L forecast. This is then summarised using the reporting and dashboarding layer to provide outputs to senior leaders for sign off.
Read full review
Pros
Devart
  • Far less connection failures. We had a lot of failures with the tool that we were using before.
  • High performance and new features are really useful. Direct mode connectivity seems to make the difference that was very much needed.
  • Works very well with Oracle Database 10g.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
Workday
  • It helps create dynamic plans for finances, operations and various functional units in an organization all under one platform
  • It helps in scenario modeling to help analyze various business events and report by any number of business dimensions including channel, customer or product
  • It can be integrated with any system including ERP, BI or CRM
Read full review
Cons
Devart
  • User Interface could be better.
  • Error Messages and error handling could be improved to be more relevant and specific.
  • Availability.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Workday
  • Budgeting either isn't included or an extra fee.
  • Expense reporting aspects are repetitive and hard to fully optimize.
  • Finance tracking is limited to basic reports with multiple levels or drill-down...hard to fully grasp without exporting data and massaging in something else (like Excel).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Workday
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
Read full review
Usability
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
I love this product. We integrate all of our financial needs between finance and the operations team so that we have real time data being looked at all of the time. Our operations can reach out and be able to discuss possible issues or variances at any time of the month and leads us to be able to have smoother month end closes.
Read full review
Workday
It is an easy transition for Excel users, with more built-in analytical tools and no need to build formulas. It also has built-in reporting and integration with Microsoft Office products such as Excel and PowerPoint. For non-Finance users, there's an initial learning curve to get used to the tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Workday
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
Read full review
Performance
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Workday
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Read full review
Support Rating
Devart
Support has been great so far but still, it could be better.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
If I had to rate the overall support for Vena based on my experiences, I would give it a 9 out of 10. The support team is very responsive, providing best assistance during both the implementation phase and ongoing use of the Vena. They have been proactive in offering training resources and addressing me very well, which significantly enhances the user experience and overall satisfaction with the Vena.
Read full review
Workday
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Workday
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
Read full review
Online Training
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Workday
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Workday
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Devart
Devart Driver ODBC for MySQL is best with no known issues. It is stand-alone. It supports SSH/SSL communication. supports HTTP / HTTPS tunneling. It is available for a variety of operating systems like Windows, Mac, and Linux. It is available for 32-bit and 64-bit environments. It supports all renowned programming languages. it supports multiple languages. It allows various data types.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis by centralizing information and improving collaboration.
Read full review
Workday
Workday became our choice because it is fully web-based and easily integrates with other systems. The learning curve for Workday was shorter than that of Dynamics. The reporting tools in Workday are more user-friendly than that of Dynamics. However Workday did not have Check Printing tools which are available in Dynamics. The organization started a project to digitize all financial transactions so it was not a priority feature. When it comes to scaling up the functionalities of Workday it was much easier than Dynamics.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
No answers on this topic
Workday
Good read only seat access
Read full review
Scalability
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Workday
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale
Read full review
Professional Services
Devart
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
No answers on this topic
Workday
This is now available in house at Workday which is convenient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Devart
  • Our organization has been largely moving into agile development life cycle and continuous integration is a key towards agile success. Automation is the first step towards continuous integration. We are really happy using Devart as a part of our automation engineering. It definitely contributes towards overall success.
  • We are trying to extend the usage. The development team has also shown interest towards the usage.
  • This is a cost effective tool. It is worth the price.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
Workday
  • It's facilitated a better financial literacy and management by the non-financial managers in the company, giving them a much better ability to see what they're spending, control it, and plan better in the future.
  • It's hard to quantify the ease of model and version management, but we could never do what we're doing now with our current staff. It would take a small army to replicate anything close to what Adaptive pulls off using Excel, if it's even possible.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Devart ODBC Driver Screenshots

Screenshot of

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard

Workday Adaptive Planning Screenshots

Screenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning AI Predictive ForecasterScreenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning AI AssistantScreenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning DashboardScreenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning Financial Planning DashboardScreenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning Financial Variance AnalysisScreenshot of Workday Adaptive Planning Process and Workflow Management