TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Emptoris

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $59

    Per User Per Month

    JAGGAER

    Score6.2 out of 10
    N/AJAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A

    SAP CLM, discontinued

    Score5 out of 10
    N/ASAP CLM (formerly CallidusCloud CLM) was a contract lifecycle solution which has been superseded as SAP's CLM offering by SAP Ariba Contract Management.N/A
    Pricing
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Editions & Modules
    Emptoris
    $59.00
    Per User Per Month
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    Chose Emptoris
    I would say there are positives and negatives to all. Emptoris seemed to be more advanced in progression of their tool. Others seem to have created a tool to meet a customers need and was not part of their core business model or competency.
    Incentivized
    JAGGAER
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Contract Authoring
    Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Emptoris and JAGGAER and SAP CLM, discontinued
    Feature
    Emptoris
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    1% above category average
    JAGGAER
    -
    Ratings
    SAP CLM, discontinued
    -
    Ratings
    Contract creation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract templates7.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Clause library/saved fields8.34 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided logic8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Collaboration
    Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Emptoris and JAGGAER and SAP CLM, discontinued
    Feature
    Emptoris
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    4% below category average
    JAGGAER
    -
    Ratings
    SAP CLM, discontinued
    -
    Ratings
    Contract sharing8.04 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract editing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaborating on contracts7.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    MS Word plug-in7.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval process8.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interdepartmental workflows7.84 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Monitoring
    Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Emptoris and JAGGAER and SAP CLM, discontinued
    Feature
    Emptoris
    7.8
    5 Ratings
    5% below category average
    JAGGAER
    -
    Ratings
    SAP CLM, discontinued
    -
    Ratings
    Contract database7.75 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract search7.55 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom contract reports7.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Tracking contract status8.44 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compliance check7.93 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Small Businesses
    DocuSign CLM
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    DocuSign CLM
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (15 ratings)
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.4
    (17 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    EmptorisJAGGAERSAP CLM, discontinued
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    If you have a highly bureaucratic organization that is heavily focused on procurement, Emptoris can provide some value. It seemed to be very good at linking the contract information to procurement for better spend control. If you are trying to implement a standalone contract management solution that allows you to easily create contracts and store them in a central location, this isn't the tool for you. There doesn't appear to be a simplified implementation. In general, when a SaaS solution has a complicated and expensive implementation, I am very skeptical. This does not show that the vendor is trying to move customers forward on a single code base. If that many things need to be done during implementation, you are starting to customize the solution for every customer. This hurts the vendor's ability to scale and make improvements in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    As a purchasing app, it is excellent. I cannot speak to its usefulness in the AP area. it may be less useful in a different environment, such as manufacturing. For research and healthcare use, it is excellent. Also, we use Banner as our ERP. SciQuest is well versed with integrating with Banner. Users with a different ERP may experience less pleasant results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    IBM
    • Document protection - the Check Out contract feature is a great way to allow external parties to make modifications to contract language without the ability to accept those changes. Those redlines can then be imported back into Emptoris and reviewed or further modified as needed.
    • Notifications & reminders - you can trigger an email manually from within the system, or you can configure automated notifications andreminders to alert users when a new task is received or has aged a given amount of days, etc.
    • Interview wizard - there is a lot of value in the interview wizard. Administrators can configure screens with selecting options via check boxes, radio buttons, or typed-in values. Variables and conditions can be used to selectively populate fields within the contract or apply other options, making for a quick and convenient method to generate contracts conforming to corporate standards.
    • Field customization - administrators can customize a list of options for various fields including contract substatus, address type, and user created business term variables.
    • Approvals - many different options are available to configure approvals to trigger automatically upon presenting and/or executing the contract including specific individuals, one or more approver groups, or based upon various criteria including terms within the contract, type of contract, or the contract's owning organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Source to settle: Although we did not purchase all the new applications in the suite SciQuest made, what we did use, worked and worked nicely. With SciQuest you can get a turn-key system.
    • I love the way SciQuest rolls out changes, measuring customer feedback, and rolling out major changes 3 times a year. Like clockwork you know what to expect ahead of time, deciding whether or not you need a particular enhancement (if optional), having plenty of time to make adjustments in business processes if needed, and/or user-base announcements.
    • I was always astonished to see both clients and potential clients come to the conferences. SciQuest would allow the "mixing" of clients and potential clients, apparently unafraid of any negative commentaries the potential clients might get. That has always been impressive to me as a techie myself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    IBM
    • Reporting, Emptoris comes with standard reports which can not always can be fit into our business. This needs to be improved. I hope Emptoris is addressing this issue in their latest releases.
    • Though the feature of editing language in MS word is excellent, loading MS word takes time.
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Their existing pricing model for the number of Suppliers onboarded or removed has been a little disappointing as there are times when suppliers do have to be switched out.
    • They have greatly helped in making UNSPSC updating easier, but I would like to be able to get an extract with a delta that would make it easier for us to update our ERP as this information needs to be stored on both sides.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    Simplified and user friendly system that has been implemented across our entire institute and with all of our vendors. We really like this program and it works well for us. Changing to another program would be a significant time investment and hassle
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    Emptoris is a pretty robust tool overall. Learning curve is small and it is simple to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    They usually respond to medium-to-low priority issues very quickly, and high priority issues almost instantly. Their support team is knowledgeable and responsive. Their Supplier Enablement team is very good and is a feature that most of their competitors don't have. The company makes a serious effort to maintain good relationships with their customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO history, which is helpful when trying to remember what happened 6 month ago
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    JAGGAER
    Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
    • We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAGGAER
    • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
    • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots