Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.
N/A
Instapage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Instapage is used by marketers to create, optimize, and personalize landing pages without coding skills. With its built-in optimization tools like A/B Testing, Ad-to-Page Personalization, and Heatmaps, marketers can launch more campaigns faster and accelerate their conversions.
$99
per month per user
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Create
$99
per month 15,000 unique monthly visitors
Optimize
starting at $199
per month starting with 30,000 unique monthly visitors
Convert
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
20% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Click analytics
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO and Conversion Optimization
Comparison of SEO and Conversion Optimization features of Product A and Product B
Do you already have Google Analytics? If so content experiments is a good, free, starting point to dip your toes in A/B testing. Do you need to run Multivariate experiments? If so, Google Content Experiments is not going to fit your needs.
Well-suited for simple landing pages which don't have any complex functionality. Great for creating landing pages for lead generation campaigns - as it comes with tons of excellent templates and a variety of forms. Not great for pages that contain a lot of information and can potentially be very long. We found that Instapage is not a great fit for building pages that need to be updated frequently, like a blog page.
Instapage makes it easy to frame out a landing page really quickly. They provide template blocks for various components of a landing page (header, features, testimonials, etc.) that you can easily modify for your own needs. Other tools provide whole-page templates, but I much prefer the section-level templating. It's more convenient to assemble a page this way and add the details on top of that versus taking a finished template and peeling away design and functional elements to get what I want.
Instapage's mobile auto-resizer works better than other platforms I've used. I found that I had many fewer adjustments on their auto-resizing of the full page than I've experienced with other tools. I still had to work with text size a bit, but they generally did a better job of ordering elements for mobile the way I would want and maintain proportionality of page elements better.
Instapage has a lot of integrations that marketers will love. I don't know if they particularly stand out in this respect, but this is a particularly important aspect of their tool that most marketers will care about.
There are only a couple of minor issues that I dislike. One is offering a Drupal community-approved update to their module. We are using a slightly older version of Drupal and it appears they don't have plans to offer a Drupal-approved update to their module for that version.
There are also random bugs when trying to format text. For example, sometimes a sans serif font appears as a serif and doesn't seem to want to change.
If you work with a template and some code, it can be challenging to edit the default coding.
The built-in forms can be a bit limiting.
The program will try to automatically reformat for mobile, but it may not always be exactly the way you want it to look, so there is a bit of redesigning required when going to mobile.
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
I've tried all of the other landing page services on the market, and this is literally the easiest to use. I am not a designer or software developer, just a simple guy and if I can learn how to use it, anyone can. That's what won me over. Their support and pre-made templates are awesome, but the usability is what I love!
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
HubSpot was terrible because it required a lot of coding experience if you wanted to work outside the given 4-5 templates. If you wanted a new template built, or to rebrand existing templates, they charged you. Very inflexible program and was very challenged by it. Our main website was built using WordPress, which is great for building webpages, but more difficult to build a landing page without the distraction of the top navigation menu. Instapage literally answered all the problems we were seeking to address: simplicity, customization, ease of use.
We've not had much of a conversion rate on some of our landing pages -- but this could be because we are relatively green with the marketing side of things and forget to send people to it. It's not easy for people to find on their own -- so I highly recommend you use some of the "hidden" SEO tools to increase the ROI. Without it, you're not going to be happy with your investment.