Hexnode UEM vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hexnode UEM
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Hexnode is a Unified Endpoint Management solution that aims to simplify the way people work with the help of intelligent tools. The management platform streamlines the device lifecycle model to offer its support at every stage, from device onboarding to the end of its life. It also gives a hands-free experience with automatic enrollment using Zero-touch enrollment, Knox Mobile Enrollment, and ABM and endpoint management with the help of dynamic group allocation in the case of…
$2.40
per month per device
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Desktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.N/A
Pricing
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Editions & Modules
Pro
$2.40
per month per device
Enterprise
$3.60
per month per device
Ultimate
$5.20
per month per device
Ultra
Contact Hexnode for a Quote
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNo support costs, No maintenance charges. Per device pricing. Discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Considered Both Products
Hexnode UEM
Chose Hexnode UEM
We previously utilized Miradore MDM for all of our tablets and management. We have since made the switch to Hexnode UEM and are migrating all of our tablets to it instead. We have saved money with this switch and we have been able to easily remove our tablets from Miradore and …
Chose Hexnode UEM
I am currently using both the platforms, Hexnode UEM and Esper. Esper is used for managing mobile devices and Lenovo Tablets while Hexnode UEM is being used for Microsoft tablets. The basic framework behind both of them is almost the same. Both of them have a clean and …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Far better than Drata because the Drata solution felt like an MVP (minimum viable product). Comparatively you can do tons more with Hexnode UEM at a comparable price point. Drata did however did have broader OS support, but Drata's lack of configurability left it as only a …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Several UEMs enable kiosks, and Hexnode's customizing options are unmatched. For instance, we may entirely redesign the smartphone, starting with the lock screen and home screen backgrounds, to include your brand and company logo. The customer support they provide are also a …
Chose Hexnode UEM
The tech support and the customization of the features they provided are great. Along with the BYOD help they provided helped manage the devices during the COVID lockdown with ease.
Chose Hexnode UEM
The ease of management of the devices with Hexnode was great.
It was extremely easy to use and easy to understand for the team.
The customer support they provided great as well.
Chose Hexnode UEM
We also looked into ZOHO Mobile Engine.
Chose Hexnode UEM
We were in the market for a solution that would reduce the workload on our client and the initial choice was Scalefusion; however, on getting a free trial, the UI wasn't that easy to use, and Scalefusion seemed like a smaller company which is new to endpoint management. Whereas …
Chose Hexnode UEM
Mobileiron was very expensive in comparison to Hexnode UEM
Chose Hexnode UEM
Hexnode UEM offers a better solution at a lower price than scalefusion MDM
Chose Hexnode UEM
We tried Jamf Pro for the same but the UI looked a bit dated and while Jamf is a more established product, it did not have multi-OS support which was one of our primary requirements. Hexnode on the other hand had a smoother UI and offered a better value for the money spent.
Chose Hexnode UEM
Google MDM did not have the kiosk lockdown mechanism like Hexnode so went with Hexnode and it turned out really well!
Chose Hexnode UEM
ManageEngine was confusing and hard to get support from, in my experience. We use other products from ManageEngine and it is always a headache to get a hold of them. Hexnode UEM is two clicks and you are talking to someone on their live chat pretty much all day. ManageEngine …
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The price is more affordable and in range. Also came with all the features that company wanted. User friendly interface than the others make more easier to navigate all the features inside. Provide support as well as the others. Also, well-known products when it comes to …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We have selected Endpoint Central especially for the presence of OS deployment module and for the maturity of other components; moreover, NinjaOne doesn't offer an onprem installation, and some customer needed it. However, NinjaOne appears to be more 'modern' in the dashboard …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We selected Endpoint Central because we couldn't manage our patching with SCCM anymore; we noticed it was inconsistent and not working properly. Also, it wouldn't work out-of-network, which is an important factor for us. These products all helped us improve the quality of our …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Endpoint Central has a lot more functionality than PDQ. We've used PDQ for years, but we no longer see the cost as worth it since Endpoint Central handles inventory and software deployment just as well. Having everything in a single interface is also useful.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
KACE SMA was beginning to feel quite dated and complicated. Some things started requiring advanced SQL queries to get sorted, and many of our old scripts stopped working because the SQL schema changed over the years. So far in ManageEngine Endpoint Central, I have not needed to …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The other applications perform limited activities such as vulnerability scanning management, but not mitigation in the case of Nessus; Intune controls device access and key management, but does not patch, does not provide remote support, and does not manage access to USB and …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine was a lot easier of setup, and is easier to use than what Landesk provides.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
For me, Endpoint Central belongs to the big three (WS1, Intune, Endpoint Central), so it's better in its own third-party app repo, Vulnerabilities report, Script deployment, OS Management, and Communication between the server and the endpoint. Is no worse than WS1 in Endpoint …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We were using Microsoft WSUS and SCCM but they lack reporting depth that ManageEngine Endpoint Central has and also they lack automation features. ManageEngine Endpoint Central complexity is mush less than SCCM and WSUS.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I was not a part of the initial selection process, but I understand the issue was related to cost per endpoint. As a user of the other solutions I would say that the other solutions do have other strengths that ManageEngine is missing. The remote access tools are superior but …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
As previously mentioned, I was looking for a solution to replace Microsoft Intune and ManageEndpoint Central to exceed my initial needs.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Similar to Microsoft Intune, but Microsoft Intune is more Microsoft-based. Zoho Assist isn't as robust.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is an on-premise unified system. All modules are integrated into one central interface and detailed reporting capability. It’s possible to manage all devices regardless of their OS
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is better than these products because of user experience and easy functionality. When I evaluated other products, I faced difficulty in exploring their features and there were too many things to do before a simple deployment unlike ManageEngine …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We evaluated multiple endpoint management solutions before selecting ManageEngine Endpoint Central, and the main reason for choosing it was its strong patch management capabilities combined with centralized endpoint control at a competitive cost. Compared to other solutions, …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Manage Engine is in a different league if I have to compare. Also, I am very secure, as most of what we do is very Security-oriented. It's not just a ticketing and remote support system; it's a Global Systems Monitoring, Updating, Securing, and Remote Support System that makes …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine provides budget friendly tools and easy to integrate with other tools and software
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central can do Linux servers which is a big plus.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
This product for me is much complete than competitors.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Remote Access Plus Cloud is a native cloud solution, lightweight agent and very competively priced. It supports both entra-joined and cloud-joined devices and has a comprehensive set of basic featues that I need. Though spotty, the system manager is fantastic, when it works and …
Best Alternatives
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
1.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
1.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hexnode UEMManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
Hexnode was best suited for us to manage android devices and more specifically for Kiosk Lockdown and restrictions. Hexnode being a UEM offers support for platforms as well. It certainly does open doors for us to increase and take up more devices under the management of Hexnode. As said earlier, Hexnode does not support wearables as of now; would be great if they could start supporting them soon.
Read full review
I think most scenarios are well-suited to Endpoint Central. Keep third-party applications upgraded, OS Deployment, Report Endpoint with vulnerabilities, check compliance with CIS, but it is much more, internal app deployment, much more compliance policy, Integration with Office 365 Conditional Access, Endpoint Configuration, Works fine with custom script even when you don't know any scripts, there are plenty of templates.
Read full review
Pros
  • Setting mandatory applications and the silent installation of enterprise apps.
  • Hexnode integrates with the Apple Device Enrollment Program and Apple Volume Purchase Program, enabling bulk software purchases and device enrollment.
  • Blocklisted applications would be uninstalled from the device and would not be available for download again.
Read full review
  • We set alerts when a devices gets low on disk space. That is automatic and creates a ticket in ME SDP. We are then able to Add space to a VM Desktop, and then go thru ManageEngine Endpoint Central to extend the drives so the entire process can be done without interruption to the end user.
  • Using the patch scans we can easily see what patches have been installed for all manufacturers not just Microsoft, without having to physically go to the device. It also allows us to choose which patches we want to push out and automate the process so we can be hands off, freeing up out time for other things.
  • Remote access to devices. This allows us to remotely make changes, not just via remote control but also make registry changes and clean up space without going to the device and without interruption to the end user.
  • Alerts. We have set up to get email alerts when new hardware is plugged into any computers. This lets us know if someone is bringing in un-authorized equipment (thumb drives, hubs, etc) to better manage what is/is not on our network.
Read full review
Cons
  • We utilize a small number of Windows devices in addition to Android ones, however, Hexnode UEM has very few Windows-specific restrictions compared to those for other platforms.
  • When we turned on the remote control, the Hexnode for Work app would periodically crash.
  • We had to get in touch with their tech support to resolve the issue because the Multi app kiosk mode for Windows devices was not correctly pushed.
Read full review
  • Prioritizing the flow between package deployments and updates. In my case, application packages must take priority over updates.
  • Reconnecting the remote control port after restarting the computer.
  • In dynamic groups, the first parameter is always "OR", which can cause problems when selecting the remote desktop.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It works exactly as needed, no need to find another solution.
Read full review
It has been a staple tool for maintaining the environment and as we grow it will be needed more. While trying to configure the system to allow us to access and support systems that are in locations outside of the primary network EndPoint Central will be crucial in facilitating that needed connection.
Read full review
Usability
UX is pretty good, but various screens are a bit redundant. Managing user and managing devices is often one in the same operation, but is broken across multiple screens. Device management policies are strange because if you make a "macOS" policy, why does it have all the Windows, iOS, Android etc options? It's unlikely you'll want all of these options for all possible OSes in one policy, but that's the only way to build a policy. Manage policy changes require remote system restart which is highly disruptive to employees.
Read full review
The product is really easy to set up and use. The web interface is relatively easy to use depending on the feature you are trying to use. The search features for inventory for both software and hardware are really good. You might get lost trying to navigate the file managers for endpoints because while the web interface is extremely easy to use, the feature set is very limited
Read full review
Support Rating
Online chat support is the best I have received from my vendors.
Read full review
The immediate chat support is great and very helpful. However, if you need escalated support or have a deeper need that the chat tool can't help with, you will experience significant wait times and slow responses. The time zone difference becomes painful to the point of often just giving up.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Follow the steps, and it will install very easy.
Read full review
It seems that the services offered with the purchase change from what is covered to what is an additional cost. Somethings I thought we had ended up requiring an additional purchase if we wanted to continue using the feature.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We previously utilized Miradore MDM for all of our tablets and management. We have since made the switch to Hexnode UEM and are migrating all of our tablets to it instead. We have saved money with this switch and we have been able to easily remove our tablets from Miradore and set them up within Hexnode UEM instead.
Read full review
We selected Endpoint Central because we couldn't manage our patching with SCCM anymore; we noticed it was inconsistent and not working properly. Also, it wouldn't work out-of-network, which is an important factor for us. These products all helped us improve the quality of our work and efficiency.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We already had someone try to walk away with an ipad after deploying Hexnode, and we were immediately able to force an activation lock telling them to bring it back and they did.
  • It has saved us a lot of time setting up ios devices as we have a limited amount of IT staff and Hexnode makes it take probably around ten minutes an ipad.
  • Employee experience has improved since we can reset code remotely and they no longer have to send the ipads back to the corporate office to get reset.
Read full review
  • It had a positive impact on our environment, now we need less workforce to deploy patches and install softwares
  • It also does the mitigation part so there we save the cost too
  • It helps in achieving compliance which is net positive to get more projects
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hexnode UEM Screenshots

Screenshot of Hexnode UEMScreenshot of Hexnode SolutionsScreenshot of Why choose Hexnode?Screenshot of Hexnode KioskScreenshot of Hexnode Integrations

ManageEngine Endpoint Central Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of