TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Hunter

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AHunter is a cloud-based email search solution that helps businesses find and verify professional email addresses from domains, companies or a specific professional on the web.

    $0

    per month

    Owler

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AOwler is a sales intelligence app developed by the company of the same name San Mateo and acquired by Meltwater June 2021, providing competitive insights, company information, and other sales relevant information.

    $8.25

    per month

    Pricing
    HunterOwler
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Starter
    $49
    per month
    Growth
    $99
    per month
    Pro
    $199
    per month
    Enterprise
    $399
    per month
    Plus (personal use)
    $99
    per year
    Pro
    $420
    per year
    Teams
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HunterOwler
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HunterOwler
    Considered Both Products
    Hunter
    No answer on this topic
    Meltwater
    Chose Owler
    We opted to use both ZoomInfo and Owler together instead of DiscoverOrg.

    The reason Owler was chosen was: it's easy of use, streamlined information display, accurate and up to date articles.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    80%
    Would buy again
    4 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    HunterOwler
    Prospecting
    Comparison of Prospecting features of Hunter and Owler
    Feature
    Hunter
    -
    Ratings
    Owler
    7.1
    16 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Advanced search00 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Identification of new leads00 Ratings6.114 Ratings
    List quality00 Ratings6.114 Ratings
    List upload/download00 Ratings6.09 Ratings
    Ideal customer targeting00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
    Load time/data access00 Ratings8.713 Ratings
    Sales Intelligence Data Standards
    Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Hunter and Owler
    Feature
    Hunter
    -
    Ratings
    Owler
    7.9
    16 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Contact information00 Ratings7.910 Ratings
    Company information00 Ratings7.916 Ratings
    Industry information00 Ratings7.915 Ratings
    Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
    Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Hunter and Owler
    Feature
    Hunter
    -
    Ratings
    Owler
    6.2
    15 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Lead qualification process00 Ratings5.311 Ratings
    Smart lists and recommendations00 Ratings5.09 Ratings
    Salesforce integration00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
    Company/business profiles00 Ratings5.314 Ratings
    Alerts and reminders00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
    Data hygiene00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
    Automatic data refresh00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
    Tags00 Ratings7.08 Ratings
    Filters and segmentation00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
    Sales Intelligence Email Features
    Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Hunter and Owler
    Feature
    Hunter
    -
    Ratings
    Owler
    7.9
    5 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Sales email templates00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Append emails to records00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HunterOwler
    Small Businesses
    Affinity CRM
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Clay
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Podium
    Score7 out of 10
    Clay
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    LinkedIn Sales Navigator for Gmail (discontinued)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HunterOwler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (26 ratings)
    9.7
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HunterOwler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hunter
    The scenario we most commonly use Hunter for is to quickly find and retrieve contact email information. Phone numbers are an added bonus, but they tend to only be available for contacts in the US. SDRs have the extension in order to confirm or to help them "guess" as to what a contact's email address might be. This speeds up our prospecting time considerably. Where Hunter falls short is not being flexible where companies have more than one email format.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    This is a free service, so it should be compared to free and low cost alerting (e.g. Google Alerts) and PE/VC funding profile (e.g. Crunchbase) services. Owler is well suited for competitive intelligence professionals, named account reps, and marketing professionals tracking company news (web mined company mentions and press releases) and social media (blogs, Video, YouTube). The alerts are high precision and tag for three key events (M&A, Funding, Exec Changes). It is the alerting and social media tools which are the key strength of the service. The company claims two million profiles, but only has 60,000 with full address information. Content includes competitors, user polls, and funding / M&A data. Owler should be viewed as a free complement to other online company research tools, but it lacks the depth to replace subscription services. Missing content includes long business descriptions; financials and discrete sizing data; family tree linkage, and executive profiles (only the CEO is covered) While they offer list building functionality, it is quite thin and non-downloadable. As such, I would not recommend Owler for sales and marketing prospecting at this point. A unique feature is a set of company polls about the direction of the company and CEO performance. Unfortunately, the response rates are often too low to be statistically meaningful.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hunter
    • Hunter provides a quick and easy way to look up the email format for any company using the free Google Chrome extension.
    • Hunter allows you to upload a bulk list of emails and verify them easily.
    • Hunter shows where verified emails were found on web pages and PDF documents. This shows that the emails were published by trusted sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    • Owler enables the user to quickly find the data and information that he or she needs.
    • I appreciate the customizable dashboard where you can set alerts and track companies you select.
    • The latest news regarding the funding rounds of startup companies is especially helpful.
    • The top competitors to companies provided by Owler often give me a great point of reference for my competitive analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hunter
    • Hunter is only as valuable as the information it is able to scrape from the internet. If a company has not listed any email addresses online, then Hunter is not going to be able to find it.
    • Sometimes Hunter is only able to identify non-personal-specific email addresses (ex: info @, support@, etc.). This makes it difficult to identify personnel emails
    • Sometimes companies will have different email domains that Hunter is not able to correlate. For example, when searching for an email address at Lead.com, Hunter is not able to point to ParentCompany.com email addresses that would be more useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    • The information provided is useful but at times the variation with other websites and tools is substantial which makes it difficult to rely solely on owler
    • Information only about bigger companies is available not for smaller and research on smaller ones are important as there are not many tools that do that
    • There are few companies that appear as defunct or do not exist but in the actual market there is a lot going on with them and being in market intelligence industry owler needs to capture that
    • It would be great if they provide revenue or growth of the in the past three years or so. As it would save our time and efforts to some extent
    • They need to maintain the database in aperiodic manner with precise information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Hunter
    No answers on this topic
    Meltwater
    Not really an applicable question as this is a free service, but if they charged $100 / year (GageIn's price) I would still license the service.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Hunter
    I think the features are good, but it makes my brain hurt (and feel overtaxed) when I have to jump between searching by name and domain and then searching via a specific email to verify. I wish I could do all of that from one landing page, one über search bar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    I think it's well designed but always room for improvement. Maybe more customization in layout or information presented. Maybe even a layout that allows comparison and ranking of companies in a similar industry or vertical, or company size, and geography
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Hunter
    No answers on this topic
    Meltwater
    I have yet to see the platform down or running slowly, but there have been multiple instances recently (Q2 2015) when the user links to a news story and Owler gives an Oops message. Users simply click on the story a second time and the story is displayed. This is a nuisance bug. I also have a sense that the system is not processing alerts as quickly as before, but I haven't tracked this closely, so I could be wrong about it.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Hunter
    No answers on this topic
    Meltwater
    The news precision, which is the most important feature for me, is very accurate. They have editors review the news to ensure it is properly tagged by company and event type.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Hunter
    No answers on this topic
    Meltwater
    Problems have been closed quickly and professionally.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Hunter
    No answers on this topic
    Meltwater
    Focus on setting up companies that have limited news coverage first. Public companies are well covered and it is easy to track them. Furthermore, the surfeit of news around public companies can crowd out smaller companies with less news. It is smaller companies where you are most likely to see a benefit in their tracking of news, blogs, press releases, and videos.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hunter
    Hunter is a good all in one solution, which hasnt always been the case as it used to be a daa only solution. However, other tools like lemlist as slightly more user friendly and make it so simple to build and launch multi-channel campaigns , and do this slightly better than Hunter.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    I believe Lead411 and Owler go hand in hand, rather than one over the other. I believe Lead411's contact generation is far stronger based on the cost, but Owler allows you to broaden your horizon for prospecting whereas Lead411 is more of a user-driven search rather than an platform-driven search.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hunter
    • Definitely Hunter has built lead lists for our clients in a very fast way for our clients.
    • It has managed to cut the times of preparation of lead lists in more than 200% of the time compared to other traditional ways.
    • Our clients can now have tons of leads and deliver contents in a faster way to validate these prospects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Meltwater
    • The personalisation of emails has definitely helped us to earn a higher reply rate, with the knock-on that this will be helping with future deals.
    • Keeps us very relevant in our conversations with contacts. They are often impressed by the research and knowledge we have on their company and how we have aligned ourselves to help. Again, small differences at the start of calls but this will be helping with the number of opportunities created.
    • Reduces SDR prospecting time. Quick and easy to get updates allowing them to process a great number of accounts on a daily basis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Hunter Screenshots

    Screenshot of Hunter DashboardScreenshot of Domain Search toolScreenshot of Hunter CampaignsScreenshot of Hunter Bulk TasksScreenshot of Hunter Google Sheets Add-On