IBM Planning Analytics vs. Planful vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Planful
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Planful is a cloud-based enterprise performance management (EPM) suite. It includes financial applications for modeling, planning, consolidation, reporting and analytics.N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequiredOptional
Additional DetailsPricing is highly dependent on the complexity and scope of the implementation.The Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson does quite well in comparison to industry giants although it does have room for improvement. Many of our clients are also well accustomed to Oracle for instance. So it's user-friendliness that helps some tools get ahead of others. The more you …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson is the best for planning and analytics since it has robust features compared to the latter.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
The IBM Planning Analytics has great technical and business data features, full customer information, and sales Forecast for design best strategy. Analyzes, processes, and provides valuable information and charts about sales, profits, human resources, value growth, and …
Planful
Chose Planful
Planful seems to have the best price to performance option against the tools listed. Some of the more premium options on the market have outdated UIs and dont get updated as frequently and other in the same price category dont seem to have the same level of options and "ease" …
Chose Planful
Before my arrival at the company, we attempted to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. We got further with Planful in the first week than in several months with Vena.
Chose Planful
Prior to joining the company, we tried to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. There we're a few reasons it didn't work out, but a lot of it related to the implementation team they provided. In just the first week with Planful, we achieved more progress than we did in several …
Chose Planful
EPM tools are all pretty close in general functionality in that they are tables of your data with a finance focused UI stacked on top. The last 5% is what the difference. Planful has a very modern UI and does a great job of updating the system over time, including things like …
Chose Planful
Planful was great for its price point. Although workday and hyperion are the more popular bunch, our use case is mostly met through Planful's functionality.
Chose Planful
Most financial folks user-friendly less technical support needed; most efficient and automated; data host in US; most automated with both the core application and excel spotlight in sync, you can view and sync in web or excel. Process time is fast.
Chose Planful
Ease of use, integrations, price, and excel compatibility were the driving factors behind getting off of Adaptive and selecting Planful over these other competitors
Chose Planful
Planful is inherently easier (I know Excel and I don't want to have to learn a new coding language) [and] has more capability and power due to the underlying multi-dimensional architecture (i.e. it can scale much better as you grow). The Dynamic Planning piece is very similar …
Chose Planful
Vena was a close second in our selection process. We liked the smaller price tag and faster start up time. It s use of Excel was attractive. However, we did not feel that it would be able to grow with us. It was only good for the short run.
Adaptive had some good features. …
Chose Planful
Being a small company with limited cash flow, my goal was to evaluate what functions that are important and how much that we have to pay for them and last how easy it is to maintain without owning internal IT staff. I have evaluated Hyperion, Adaptive, Vena, and Host. …
Vena
Chose Vena
Prophix is powerful, and structures data on the back-end in a very similar way with multiple data models, and I have used it before. But the learning curve is steep. Building complex rules, e.g. for a union personnel model, was much harder than designing the same logic in …
Chose Vena
DataRails - was the closest to Vena but their product development seemed behind and we were concerned about their ability to continue development as well as supporting us.
Cube - poor product for us. Seemed applicable to small businesses. Limited features, inexperienced sales …
Chose Vena
Vena is a strong fit for teams that want to keep working in Excel while adding structure, workflows, and a centralized database. Vena emphasizes its native Excel experience, along with planning templates, workflow automation, and integrations for budgeting/forecasting.
Chose Vena
We evaluated Vena alongside DataRails, Planful, and Board during our selection process. Each is a credible platform with real strengths, and the right answer depends heavily on the organization's environment, team composition, and what they're trying to accomplish. We selected …
Chose Vena
We found Vena to be much more intuitive and easy to leverage with our existing models and templates we've built in Excel already. It allowed our finance and ops teams to get traction and value from the solution much faster than we felt the other CPM solutions we looked at.
Chose Vena
We went with Vena Solutions because it was able to meet the needs in every way for what we were looking for in a budgeting solution. From an admin perspective, it was very intuitive, but from an end user (contributor) perspective, it was outstanding that we were able to keep …
Chose Vena
The decision to go with Vena was based mostly on flexibility.
Chose Vena
Vena doesn't require technical knowledge to build reports, so maintenance of the system can be maintained by the finance team.
Chose Vena
We chose Vena mainly due to how flexible it is for our business, and that we would be able to own the software inhouse (finance team) rather than relying heavily on external consultants, just like the case with other software we looked at.
Chose Vena
We partnered with Vena Solutions because our customers love Excel. This solution provides the ability for our customers to have an integrated and collaborative planning process while still leveraging the tool they love so much.
Chose Vena
We were using Dynamic Budgets before we moved over to Vena and researched many, many, many other products before settling on Vena in the end. One of the things that quickly knocked out other vendors was our unique fiscal calendar. We have 13 periods (4 weeks each) and that …
Chose Vena
They have superior database capacity due to the power of the cloud. Usability and user adoption is quick and immediate due to the direct integration with Excel and ease of use for end users and Vena administrators.
Chose Vena
We spent about a year and a half in the selection process for our budgeting system. The issue that we kept coming across was speed, flexibility, and a lack of understanding of our process during the sales cycle. Most of these other products wanted us to change our budgeting …
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
108 Ratings
1% below category average
Planful
6.1
64 Ratings
22% below category average
Vena
7.9
174 Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.695 Ratings6.933 Ratings8.1109 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.6108 Ratings5.057 Ratings8.1156 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.4102 Ratings6.555 Ratings7.6165 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.1
114 Ratings
3% above category average
Planful
7.6
103 Ratings
3% below category average
Vena
8.0
288 Ratings
2% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.7111 Ratings8.5102 Ratings8.3275 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.9112 Ratings7.1103 Ratings8.3275 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.086 Ratings00 Ratings7.4107 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.8110 Ratings7.296 Ratings8.0245 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
108 Ratings
3% above category average
Planful
7.5
85 Ratings
7% below category average
Vena
7.9
230 Ratings
2% below category average
Publish to Web7.9101 Ratings8.433 Ratings7.6130 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.3101 Ratings6.577 Ratings8.1169 Ratings
Report Versioning8.599 Ratings6.554 Ratings8.1192 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.392 Ratings8.565 Ratings8.1171 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
109 Ratings
2% above category average
Planful
6.2
51 Ratings
18% below category average
Vena
8.2
160 Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.2109 Ratings5.040 Ratings8.7143 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.6102 Ratings6.42 Ratings8.6117 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.899 Ratings6.044 Ratings7.5133 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.832 Ratings7.33 Ratings8.071 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
114 Ratings
5% below category average
Planful
8.9
102 Ratings
6% above category average
Vena
8.4
278 Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.2112 Ratings8.495 Ratings8.1263 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.6113 Ratings8.894 Ratings8.4263 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.0114 Ratings8.595 Ratings8.4264 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.641 Ratings8.855 Ratings8.4127 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.6106 Ratings9.777 Ratings8.5204 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
99 Ratings
5% below category average
Planful
2.3
42 Ratings
106% below category average
Vena
7.2
141 Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.596 Ratings2.540 Ratings6.9136 Ratings
Mobile Application6.661 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.971 Ratings2.230 Ratings7.5122 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.5
123 Ratings
5% above category average
Planful
8.7
155 Ratings
7% above category average
Vena
8.4
348 Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning8.0119 Ratings8.7138 Ratings8.6315 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.5122 Ratings9.0154 Ratings8.7334 Ratings
Forecasting8.9122 Ratings9.0145 Ratings8.6322 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.7121 Ratings7.8131 Ratings7.9288 Ratings
Management reporting8.5122 Ratings9.0149 Ratings8.2324 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.5
114 Ratings
9% above category average
Planful
8.0
117 Ratings
3% above category average
Vena
7.2
301 Ratings
8% below category average
Financial data consolidation9.2110 Ratings9.3106 Ratings7.4262 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.3101 Ratings7.986 Ratings6.9195 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.4103 Ratings7.470 Ratings6.8178 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.5101 Ratings7.772 Ratings7.6175 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.893 Ratings7.039 Ratings5.9125 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.7106 Ratings7.788 Ratings7.3224 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.8107 Ratings9.186 Ratings8.4263 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
115 Ratings
6% above category average
Planful
7.7
151 Ratings
3% below category average
Vena
8.3
328 Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.0111 Ratings8.8132 Ratings8.4295 Ratings
Management Reporting8.7112 Ratings8.8143 Ratings8.4307 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.5114 Ratings7.1140 Ratings9.0317 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.2103 Ratings6.5113 Ratings8.5247 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.875 Ratings7.13 Ratings7.099 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.2
117 Ratings
2% above category average
Planful
5.9
103 Ratings
31% below category average
Vena
8.3
261 Ratings
3% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.6116 Ratings5.191 Ratings8.2222 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.2111 Ratings2.655 Ratings9.1168 Ratings
KPIs7.9114 Ratings7.476 Ratings8.5195 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.0112 Ratings6.974 Ratings8.0208 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.3111 Ratings6.963 Ratings8.2190 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.382 Ratings6.410 Ratings7.9147 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
115 Ratings
11% above category average
Planful
8.9
139 Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.1
318 Ratings
1% below category average
Flat file integration8.9112 Ratings9.5104 Ratings7.8259 Ratings
Excel data integration9.4113 Ratings7.8129 Ratings9.0298 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.8104 Ratings9.496 Ratings7.7236 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(123 ratings)
8.8
(163 ratings)
8.5
(345 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
8.7
(23 ratings)
8.9
(26 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(69 ratings)
8.3
(21 ratings)
8.9
(38 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
8.7
(10 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
8.3
(9 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(93 ratings)
8.9
(22 ratings)
8.9
(106 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(9 ratings)
8.2
(10 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
8.9
(6 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(4 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
8.5
(9 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(4 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsPlanfulVena
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Ideal for large organization with complex multi-dimensional data, large budgets and dedicated administrator support. The performance of the TM1 data base is unmatched. The PAW and PAX options providing planners to work in both Excel and workspace environment. Higher Implementation efforts due to the greenfield implementations. Visualization features are not up to the mark.
Read full review
Planful
Planful is initially easy to setup and if a company is already using a mid layer to transform and standardise GL data, management reports can be set up in days, not weeks or months. Budgeting template setup does get some getting used to but the training provided by Planful is sufficient to get going and learn along the way. Building custom reports is straightforward and the interface is user-friendly, therefore the accounting team can get going without the need for technical specialists getting involved. Budget and forecasting is flexible and drivers of revenue and cost can be created in Planful and customised by Unit or Geography.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
It’s great for achieving flexible outcomes amid ever-changing desires among its user base. We have not implemented AI into our finances quite yet, but this seems very promising for working more efficiently in analysis and narrative prep. It works great for constant real-time data and allows us to make decisions on the fly.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Planful
  • It aggregates data from different sources well, allowing me to report on a wide variety of metrics that interrelate.
  • I can build detailed reports so that my monthly and weekly reporting is done more efficiently
  • I like the tools that I am using to create dedicated models for forecasting and budgeting purposes
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Planful
  • Dashboarding could be more flexible and easier to use.
  • Dynamic Reporting has room for flexibility with nesting, dimension names showing up instead of “All,” and overall flexibility.
  • Make Analyze view in Spotlight more intuitive.
  • A high-level onboarding guide to understanding the different components of Planful, data flows, and tips & tricks.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Planful
Our new Comptroller understands the value of Planful, and we plan to utilize it further in the organization to enhance external reporting. Strangely enough, Planful had not previously been embraced by the former CFO, who argued that we were running two sets of books (of course, we were not). Fortunately, the before mentioned reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income demonstrated that to the banks.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Planful
The tool is extremely adaptable, and it enables very quick querying to give us opportunity to gain live insights into the business. Given its adaptability, we are also able to create scenario analyses very quickly in rapidly changing environments. The formatting also enables us to provide this information in a very consumable manner.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
I love this product. We integrate all of our financial needs between finance and the operations team so that we have real time data being looked at all of the time. Our operations can reach out and be able to discuss possible issues or variances at any time of the month and leads us to be able to have smoother month end closes.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
I only give a 9 rating rather than a 10 rating because it seems that every day around 2pm we see a slowdown in the use of Planful. I have requested our internal IT department verify that it is not an internal issue and have been assured it is the tool. We have not yet reached out to Planful to do extensive research to solve this issue.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
Again, the system is very reliable and, for the most part, runs very quick and smooth. When running larger queries, it does take some time, and during budgeting season our users experienced slower loading times, but nothing that raises concerns outside of normal network issues. Occasionally, as with any software we use, it will crash and you have to restart, but that does not happen very often.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
IBM support has been very quick to respond and handle the very few issues we've had. We've had a third-party who partners with IBM to be our consulting team which has helped greatly reduce the need for us to contact IBM directly. I highly recommend researching and selecting a well-respected partner to help with an implementation as well as ongoing support as needed.
Read full review
Planful
Sometimes we get great help when using Planful's support team and other times we don't. In particular, there is one person that often responds to our support tickets who is less than helpful, hence the reason for the 5 out of 10 rating. As a result, most of the time we reach out to our Planful consulting group as they provide faster and better support
Read full review
Vena Solutions
If I had to rate the overall support for Vena based on my experiences, I would give it a 9 out of 10. The support team is very responsive, providing best assistance during both the implementation phase and ongoing use of the Vena. They have been proactive in offering training resources and addressing me very well, which significantly enhances the user experience and overall satisfaction with the Vena.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
My team has attended training offered several times before/during the Planful Perform conference. This training has been extremely useful and we always learn something we didn't know prior to the training. The trainers are always very knowledgeable and more than willing to help each and every user after the training with specific questions regarding their environment. Planful also offers training and certifications on their training hub. I have completed a couple of the certifications. The courses are easy to follow along with and very informative. Additionally, Planful schedules webinars pretty regularly. They'll email their customers and allow you to register to participate live. They also record these sessions so you can refer back to them at a later date or if you are unable to attend at the time the webinar is offered, you can register anyway and get access to the recording. Their training has improved year over year!
Read full review
Vena Solutions
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
Planful provides a lot of online training support. There's so many options for training. Admin Learning Courses, User Learning Courses. Plus they have several webinars devoted to the tool and the new features they release. New Releases can be practiced in a Sandbox Environment prior to going live in Production
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
After going through the initial implementation with Host Analytics and a re-implementation with Cervello (due to an ERP change, not due to a poor initial implementation), I've learned that you really must rely on your internal staff to bear most of the implementation burden. Use the vendor or partners for ideas and best-practice suggestions, and some of the easy-but-time-consuming work. Since you will ultimately be using and maintaining the application, you should be able to do most of it yourself.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Planful
Prior to joining the company, we tried to implement Vena but were unsuccessful. There we're a few reasons it didn't work out, but a lot of it related to the implementation team they provided. In just the first week with Planful, we achieved more progress than we did in several months with Vena.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis by centralizing information and improving collaboration.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Planful
From our experience, Planful is only used in 2 overhead departments in our organization. We easily added another overhead department, but they decided against using Planful for their workforce and financial planning. Removing them from our environment was extremely easy.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Automate direct data connections to multiple data sources
  • One secured version of the the truth (for data and formulas)
  • Ability to scale to much more detailed planning with option to create predictive forecasts at detail
  • Business user friendly with powerful Excel integration
  • Very flexible and powerful modeling, can handle custom modeling needs at scale
  • Can make the same data available across finance and ops, but at the level of details and timeline that makes sense for them
Read full review
Planful
  • Has allowed users to view a real-time P&L in a way they weren't able to do with Qlik.
  • Budget to Actual analysis has become much more streamlined and actionable
  • Long-range plan process has been significantly streamlined and a lot of time has been cut out of the process.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Planful Screenshots

Screenshot of the Planful Planform DashboardScreenshot of Planful for FinanceScreenshot of Planful for MarketingScreenshot of ReportsScreenshot of a Capacity Planning TemplateScreenshot of Integrations

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard