TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Webexpenses

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWebexpenses is a global provider of spend management solutions, combining integrated Expense Cards with cloud-based software for businesses of all sizes across 70+ countries. Serving industries such as retail, finance, technology, construction, and not-for-profit, Webexpenses gives businesses control over company spending by automating processes, proactively enforcing policies, and controlling costs. Features The Webexpenses platform includes both desktop…

    $10.13

    per month per user

    Pricing
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essential
    $10.13
    per month per user
    Scale
    $12.15
    per month per user
    Pro
    $18
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$250 one-time fee per installation
    Additional Details—These USD amounts are approximate and provided for guidance only. As exchange rates fluctuate daily with market movements, the actual USD equivalent will vary over time and may differ at the point of transaction or when a formal USD price list is established.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Considered Both Products
    IFS
    No answer on this topic
    Webexpenses
    Chose Webexpenses
    Performs better, improved [customization.]
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    650 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    344 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    675 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    215 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    240 Answers
    Features
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    46% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.7
    5 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.85 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.25 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    4 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Webexpenses
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expense Management
    Comparison of Expense Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    -
    Ratings
    Webexpenses
    8.5
    161 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Employee Expense Reporting00 Ratings8.7161 Ratings
    Corporate Card Reconciliation00 Ratings8.274 Ratings
    Payment Management
    Comparison of Payment Management features of IFS Applications and Webexpenses
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    -
    Ratings
    Webexpenses
    8.4
    150 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Customizable Approval Policies00 Ratings8.4112 Ratings
    Financial Document Management00 Ratings7.737 Ratings
    Payment Status Tracking00 Ratings8.9140 Ratings
    Payment Audit Trail00 Ratings8.9114 Ratings
    Duplicate Bill Detection00 Ratings8.038 Ratings
    Advanced OCR00 Ratings7.825 Ratings
    Electronic Funds Transfer00 Ratings8.883 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Brex
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Expensify
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    8.7
    (824 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (50 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    8.6
    (824 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (11 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (10 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (377 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (20 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (9 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (11 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IFS ApplicationsWebexpenses
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    Webexpenses is well suited for payroll to easily track workforce expenses and reducing hours of manual work from approving and processing the submitted claims. I have to highlight the automated custom report generating, which suits any needs to see reports for our teams. At our organization there is no sceniario, where Webexpenses would be less appropriate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    • imports credit card transactions from our corporate card program without issue
    • allows for easy set up of new users
    • is a very intuitive, easy to learn tool
    • has a very responsive support and customer service team
    • Set up and configuration was thorough, and they were able to work through our unique issues, such as custom segments in NetSuite.
    • It is a very inexpensive product. Well worth the cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    • Would be nice if claims could be organised into certain chronological orders i.e. ordered by date so I don't have to copy and delete claims when adding a claim in that has an earlier date
    • Would be ideal to have an option to save full routes rather than just addresses maybe?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    There doesn't seem to be anything in the market at the same price point that is better, however if there is an interrupter in the market that provides better value, then we would heavily assess the cost of change to see if we should move on to the alternative offering.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    I think this is an easy to use and effective system for expense management. I like how I can upload images and documents directly from my phone onto the mobile app. It's beneficial for continuity that the app and the web browser work the same, and I can save claims to come back to later if I wish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    The soft ware is reliable. The phone app works well and allows you to upload evidence, receipts, log mileage and log expenses. It works well and is rarely locked or there are very few times the app is down. The laptop based software is easy to access and again is always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    The phone based app and the laptop based app always load quickly. It is easy to access. It is quick to use. It easy and quick to upload information and evidence. It is easy to log details. The information goes off to accounting and payroll quickly resulting in prompt payments for staff
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    The support for the initial setup was great, but since then we have only had to contact support once when we had problems uploading credit card files. The help we received at this time was not good and we ended up trying various things until we resolved the problem ourselves. The online support tutorials are good, but searching for a specific issue is difficult.
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    All went well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    It was difficult to train multiple people via video, as they learned at different speeds, and most of the user champions were not as capable with systems and finance processes as our dept.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    As long as you have people that are fully aware of the setup steps to get users into the software then I would see no issues arising for any company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    I would have to say that Webexpenses does not stack up well in comparison to Expensify. If given a choice, I would choose Expensify for the best user experience and mobile / desktop being more seamless. It accomplishes the same thing but has a more modern, minimal, and streamlined feel to it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Webexpenses
    Every department in my organization uses webexpenses. My role and the role of others involves travel, expenses and mileage. Everyone uses the app to log details, upload receipts and to claim allowable expenses. having spoken to everyone within my team and wider directorate, i do not know of anyone who has had issues with the app
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Webexpenses
    • Easy integration with your existing finance / accounting software.
    • Lot of time is being saved in maintaining records and now going completely online.
    • Love the option of Scan receipts with Google-vision-powered optical character. This also resulted in less use of paper in our office.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Webexpenses Screenshots

    Screenshot of the Webexpenses mobile app, that captures receipts instantly.Screenshot of Webexpenses, accessed through a desktop, iOS, Android or Windows device.Screenshot of mileage tracking with Webexpenses.Screenshot of a display of expense-related spend, reported and tracked with customisable reports.Screenshot of the mobile app, where users' expenses can be built, submitted and approved.Screenshot of Webexpenses payments and expense reimbursements.