Fin is Intercom’s AI Agent for customer service, designed to deliver high-quality answers, even for complex queries. It works with any helpdesk, or it can be paired with Intercom’s next-generation Helpdesk to get the full Intercom Customer Service Suite.
$0.99
one-time fee per 1 resolution
Joule
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Joule is an AI copilot that’s grounded in an organization's business data and infused with AI agents. It proactively assists employees in every cloud application they use while automating complex processes.
N/A
Pricing
Fin by Intercom
Joule
Editions & Modules
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per 1 resolution
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
The Early Stage program
$65
per month (6 support seats)
Proactive Support Plus add-on
$99
per month
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin resolution
per month per seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fin by Intercom
Joule
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Fin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works:
Use Fin in at least 250 conversations within the first 90 days after trial. If you're not satisfied, you can request a refund of up to $1M. Refund requests must be submitted within 90 days of starting the subscription.
Joule Base
Joule Base is a no-cost entitlement of SAP cloud products that enables teams to navigate SAP systems more easily, find the right information more quickly, and complete everyday tasks faster.
Joule Premium
Joule Premium extends Joule Base with more powerful AI, including advanced Joule skills, premium embedded AI scenarios, and Joule Agents. Joule Premium capabilities are accessed through the purchase of AI units. Visit the pricing page linked above to learn more about Joule Premium capabilities.
It's great for a web-enabled tool, so there is immediate ability to give feedback or ask questions. It isn't as easy to set up a desktop application as it would require more coding experience. Some older users are skeptical of its abilities, and that it is taking away from customer service, but in our use, it enhances it - that is a tough barrier to breach.
Joule in SuccessFactors is well suited in case you just want to have a quicker way to execute quick actions for a couple of users, or if you extend Joule with some Joule skills. Apart from this at this point in Time I don't see a lot of default scenarios that Joule brings to the table in SuccessFactors.
Instructing the right way of doing functionalities for e.g. creation of PR
pinpoints the exact PR and provide insightful information about it, which allows procurement processors to do the next step
provides thing to watch for in your tasks, for e.g. quickly address PO floating issues by navigating and showing the other partial items that are not GRed.
While Fin by Intercom AI is great, I think it still struggles a little in giving nuanced answers. For example, we provide a custom product to customers, to the same question may have different answers for different customers. While I don't expect Fin by Intercom to know all nuances etc., Fin by Intercom often gives overly certain or in-flexible answers despite Fin by Intercom guidance etc added.
Letting conversations go to a teammate: There are times when Fin by Intercom simply keeps trying to answer the customer, even as they get more frustrated or Fin by Intercom is clearly going in loops. We have added guidance that improves it somewhat, but this still happens to an extent. At the end of the day, some queries just need a person, and I think Fin by Intercom should err on the side of caution in this case. No person is going to be unhappy to be offered to speak to a person if it's not needed. But they will get frustrated if it's not offered when needed.
Repeatable/reliable answers: This one is odd. So often, I have found that Fin by Intercom gives different answers to the same prompt or question, with no changes or updates to the content. This is frustrating as I can work hard one day trying to fine tune an answer Fin by Intercom will give (via content, guidance, and snippets), test the answer, and it is fine, then another test, it gives a different answer. It may be correct, but I don't understand why this happens.
Fin by Intercom knowledge sources: Sometimes the sources or information Fin by Intercom uses for an answer makes little to no sense. I have seen examples where Fin by Intercom has answered a query with a mainly unrelated source, where a help article which matches a lot of the keywords wasn't used or further down in the list. I feel like there needs to be better control/options in giving feedback to Fin by Intercom which articles or relevant to certain topics.
AI topics: Not purely Fin by Intercom AI, but AI topics, used in Fin by Intercom AI Analytics, could be better. I wish I could edit or amend them, as they're often a little vague or not useful on their own.
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
As we explore, we can learn more. As i believe, we can only learn to live and live to learn stuffs. So as well AI does the same and improve itself. By trying and prompting joule more, we can use it in better ways. I would definitely wait and use the new versions shared in SAP Teched on Joule with more LLM involved
It's very user-friendly and intuitive to use. We never get any comments from customers saying they don't understand how to use it or what is happening. However, we have had some issues where customers' previous conversation history was being wiped, and it was very difficult to tell if this was an Intercom issue or something on our side, so it took a lot of time to dig into.
I would rate Joule’s overall usability a 10 out of 10 because it makes interacting with SAP incredibly simple, intuitive, and fast. The conversational interface removes the complexity normally associated with navigating SAP modules, running transactions, or building reports. Even non-technical users can get meaningful insights within seconds just by asking natural language questions.
Intercom is the premier customer support/engagement model and it definitely has one of the top tier customer support teams as well. I don't think I have ever waited more than 5 minutes to get the information I need or get help with an issue. They are incredible and I aim to model our customer service department after them.
Usually support for Joule takes longer than normal, and the correct answer always takes a long time to get, or we just don't get it at all, and we fix ourselves.
Fin definitely stacks up pretty much at the same level when it comes to leveraging the input data KB to address customer queries. However reporting flexibility is something missing compared to the two mentioned platforms. The categorization of issues is much easier and accurate making it further analysis less time intensive. Why we selected Finis a difficult question for me to answer as the above platforms are from my previous company and when I moved to my current role Fin was already in place.
Joule is better because it doesn't take only data available on the web, but combines that with data provided directly by the game publisher through API to us which includes every single match played = all data points from all of those matches. That means that for us Joule gives deeper insights than any online AI chat agent could do
