LogicalDOC vs. SAP Concur
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LogicalDOC | Score10 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | LogicalDOC is designed to help organizations gain control over document management, with a particular focus on fast content retrieval and business process automation. The vendor says their solution enables teams to create, co-author, and coordinate any amount of documents. Additionally, the vendor says with LogicalDOC users will increase collaboration and productivity via a next-generation web interface, integration into Microsoft Office and Outlook, and automatic import from shared folders. | $0 |
SAP Concur | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | SAP Concur is a SaaS expense report management product, and handles corporate travel booking, expense report automation, reimbursement, audit, and business intelligence, and corporate card integration. | $7 per month |
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Would buy again 732 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Delivers good value for the price 586 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 738 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 385 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Implementation went as expected 419 Answers | |
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Brex Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | Expensify Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | ![]() Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River) Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.4 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 8.2 |
| Availability | - | 8.3 |
| Performance | - | 6.8 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.8 |
| In-Person Training | - | 5.9 |
| Online Training | - | 8.2 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.9 |
| Configurability | - | 8.1 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.1 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.9 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.6 |
| LogicalDOC | SAP Concur | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | LogicalDOC Screenshots | SAP Concur Screenshots |
















