TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ManageEngine Endpoint Central

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ADesktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.

    $795

    per year per user

    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AServiceDesk Plus is free help desk software from ManageEngine, a division of Zoho Corporation.

    $10

    Starting Price Per Month

    Pricing
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Standard
    $10.00
    Starting Price Per Month
    Professional
    $21.00
    Starting Price Per Month
    Enterprise
    $50.00
    Starting Price Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Considered Both Products
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Configurability and affordability
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Having the two integrate together as you can have a history of each piece of equipment is wonderful. You can easily see what has been done or if it is a reoccurring issue that might be the symptoms of a bigger issue.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    In terms of feather and usability ManageEngine Endpoint Central far surpasses both. Although spiceworks is free, you are limited to support and new feature updates. Intune does well what it is built for, but does not provide all the features that are needed for day to day …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Endpoint Central provides a more robust unified Endpoint Management product. Other products would need separate add-ons or third party products to manage what we would require from an asset management product.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    both are great. i like to finish the ticket reports on what i did for the solution
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    My opinion is its night and day. We are saving so much time since we switched products
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    From the few that I have used, and the ones I researched, I like the fact that there are many other ManageEngine products that all link together to build a fantastic tool kit for IT. Also, I have found that the few times I have had problems, their support has been very …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Intune doesn't offer 3rd party patching and the reporting isn't on the same level for some of the offerings in this application. Nessus is very expensive, and we have used both at the same time to compare and they pull the same results with the ManageEngine Endpoint Central …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    I had already used SCCM in other companies, but when I joined the company I'm currently in, I started using Endpoint Central and I've been incredibly satisfied with the service and support.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Its can always be integrated with ManageEngine other products, which is very useful.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central has more modules- like MDM and OS deployer, I am not aware if either of the solutions I have used before have this functionality
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    We didn't try any other products - we went straight for ManageEngine Endpoint Central due to the value for money on the features you get.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central is the best option if the cost-benefit obtained is evaluated.With ManageEngine Endpoint Central it is possible to perform vulnerability analysis and patching of operating systems and applications other than Microsoft such as: Linux and Mac. This …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    In my opinion, ManageEngine Endpoint Central is way easier to use for endpoint management and is superior in all ways.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    TeamViewer is a good solution for remote control, but I haven't found it as useful for patch management, software deployment and inventory reporting
    However, the file transfer and chat functions of TeamViewer are better to use than Endpoint central
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    The principal reason was that ManageEngine's Desktop Central supports multi-platform (Windows, Mac and Linux) while SCCM obviously only supports Windows systems. We have Windows and Mac computers in the company. Besides also the Mobile Device Management module, supports Chrome …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    I've used RDP for remote control. I've used WSUS to deploy patches. I've used various methods to achieve nearly silent install of software. The great thing about ManageEngine Desktop Central is that it is all under one umbrella with one interface.
    Incentivized
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    193 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    182 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    192 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    163 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Incident and problem management
    Comparison of Incident and problem management features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Feature
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    -
    Ratings
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    7.5
    22 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Expert directory00 Ratings6.015 Ratings
    Service restoration00 Ratings7.217 Ratings
    Self-service tools00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
    Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings7.716 Ratings
    ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings8.818 Ratings
    ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings7.520 Ratings
    ITSM asset management
    Comparison of ITSM asset management features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Feature
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    -
    Ratings
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    6.1
    17 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Configuration mangement00 Ratings6.616 Ratings
    Asset management dashboard00 Ratings6.516 Ratings
    Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings5.112 Ratings
    Change management
    Comparison of Change management features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Feature
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    -
    Ratings
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    6.8
    18 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Change requests repository00 Ratings7.717 Ratings
    Change calendar00 Ratings5.813 Ratings
    Service-level management00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Small Businesses
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Action1
    Score9.4 out of 10
    SysAid
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM MaaS360
    Score8 out of 10
    Ivanti ITSM
    Score6.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (204 ratings)
    9.0
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.4
    (15 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (164 ratings)
    7.7
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.1
    (11 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.8
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    1.8
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    1.8
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    1.8
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    1.8
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    For small businesses, it is also free, which, for what it offers, is really helpful. It works better than similar products, such as SCCM, both within and outside the internal network. I do not see scenarios in which it could be less appropriate.
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    We use the free version, it allows up to 10 technicians to be added to the system, but that has never been an issue, as we are a small team. The functionality and usability of MESDP are great and can work with larger teams too. It is well suited to be used as a main Ticketing system, and this is not limited to IT only, I am sure other teams that need to keep track and log issues will be able to utilize MESDP without any issues. There is a self-service portal as an option, however, we do not use it as of yet, as there has not been the need for it. If you would need to use the same instance within multiple departments, this may be a bit tricky to achieve, as there is no easy way to limit visibility to tickets from other departments, however, I am sure there is a way around it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • We set alerts when a devices gets low on disk space. That is automatic and creates a ticket in ME SDP. We are then able to Add space to a VM Desktop, and then go thru ManageEngine Endpoint Central to extend the drives so the entire process can be done without interruption to the end user.
    • Using the patch scans we can easily see what patches have been installed for all manufacturers not just Microsoft, without having to physically go to the device. It also allows us to choose which patches we want to push out and automate the process so we can be hands off, freeing up out time for other things.
    • Remote access to devices. This allows us to remotely make changes, not just via remote control but also make registry changes and clean up space without going to the device and without interruption to the end user.
    • Alerts. We have set up to get email alerts when new hardware is plugged into any computers. This lets us know if someone is bringing in un-authorized equipment (thumb drives, hubs, etc) to better manage what is/is not on our network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • It is very easy to create business rules that automatically route email tickets to the correct department and apply templates to correctly categorize the incident.
    • The technician auto-assign function allows email tickets to be fairly apportioned using a round robin technique. We do not cuurently use the load balancing technique which is also available.
    • It is very easy to bulk edit requests to correct miscatergorization by Analysts. (i.e. Incidents vs. Service Requests)
    • Coordinating communications and notifying ticket holders when a network or application event is resolved is very simple.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • Prioritizing the flow between package deployments and updates. In my case, application packages must take priority over updates.
    • Reconnecting the remote control port after restarting the computer.
    • In dynamic groups, the first parameter is always "OR", which can cause problems when selecting the remote desktop.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • Reporting tools; the report features can be a little limited, it can be quite tricky to get the information you want displayed in detail
    • You can set required fields within the ticket template, which should mean the user has to complete them before they can submit the ticket, however this often doesn't enforce correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    ManageEngine is considered an excellent product due to its comprehensive suite of solutions for IT management, with ManageEngine Endpoint Central specifically excelling in endpoint management. The platform stands out for its user-friendly interface, robust features, and versatility in addressing diverse IT needs. It offers organizations a centralized solution for endpoint security, patch management, software deployment, and asset management
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Because this is the best tool, we have given ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a rating of 9 out of 10 because it provides a good overall IT service management experience, especially for ticketing, asset management, automation, and reporting. It has helped us organize IT support processes and improve visibility. For ticketing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Not using WNS to communicate with the endpoint console is a big plus. We now use Workspace One, and WNS can be really annoying at times. After deployment, it cleans itself, which is important for us because our current solution leaves the package on the computer and requires maintenance. The remotely script command is a lifesaver.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    As any other feature-rich software package, starting out with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has a little bit of a learning curve, but it usually doesn't take very long until you can use the basic features. Training new technicians on the use of the software does not take very long, and for users to submit tickets it is as easy as sending an email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    The immediate chat support is great and very helpful. However, if you need escalated support or have a deeper need that the chat tool can't help with, you will experience significant wait times and slow responses. The time zone difference becomes painful to the point of often just giving up.
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    I have a few issues with MESDP and even though we use the free version, the support staff was very quick to respond and extremely competent and helpful. Luckily, I have only had to use them a couple of times over the 2.5 years I have been using their product, but they strike me as very competent, friendly and helpful, regardless of the version of their product you use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    It seems that the services offered with the purchase change from what is covered to what is an additional cost. Somethings I thought we had ended up requiring an additional purchase if we wanted to continue using the feature.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    I was not a part of the initial selection process, but I understand the issue was related to cost per endpoint. As a user of the other solutions I would say that the other solutions do have other strengths that ManageEngine is missing. The remote access tools are superior but at the end of the day you get what you pay for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Spiceworks was free, which obviously had both benefits and limitations - I will say that the community around Spiceworks has always been great. If we could replicate that experience with the ME user base, it would be terrific.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • It had a positive impact on our environment, now we need less workforce to deploy patches and install softwares
    • It also does the mitigation part so there we save the cost too
    • It helps in achieving compliance which is net positive to get more projects
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ManageEngine A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    • The tool does not scale well from an ROI perspective. As you add a customer, you must add a new instance, hence a new license.
    • The tool is probably on the expensive side (34,000 USD per 130 technicians per year).
    • There is no usage beyond incident, change, and problem management. The CMDB feature is extremely limited and cannot generate additional ROI. There is no knowledge-base or integration with other software (other than ME Desktop Central).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ManageEngine Endpoint Central Screenshots

    Screenshot of HomepageScreenshot of Threats and patchesScreenshot of ToolsScreenshot of Inventory managementScreenshot of Device control