Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Access
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools.
$139.99
per PC
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Cloud ERP (formerly SAP S/4HANA Cloud) is a modular ERP that enables users to run mission-critical operations in real time from anywhere, introduce new business models in any industry, and expand globally. SAP Cloud ERP is a SaaS product and can also be deployed in a hybrid landscape for quicker time to value.​ ​​ SAP Cloud ERP is a foundational component of theN/A
Microsoft SQL Server
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.
$1,418
Per License
Pricing
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Access
$139.99
per PC
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$1,418.00
Per License
Enterprise
$13,748.00
Per License
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPer user, per month
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Access
Chose Microsoft Access
Visual FoxPro is a discontinued software, and no longer has support. Also, very few people still use it, or ever know how to use it. Excel is very popular, but [Microsoft] Access can do things like data joins much easier and faster
Chose Microsoft Access
Although SQL is a full-blown platform for heavy database management, Microsoft Access serves the purpose perfectly for small and mid-scale enterprises. It is also perfect for people just getting started with database management. The graphical user interface is a major plus …
Chose Microsoft Access
Unlike enterprise-level databases, MS Access doesn't require setting up a complex server environment with user security schemes. It's an excellent tool for small scale databases where purchasing and setting up a product like MS SQL Server could be an overkill. Unlike …
Chose Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access is a bit dated compared to other database tools. It is slower, not able to handle quantities of data that are as large as the other tools, and a bit more finicky. However, it is sometimes the preferred tool for some clients. It also has a lower barrier to entry …
Chose Microsoft Access
MS Access is the little brother to all these products. In no way is it as feature-rich as the competition I have selected. It is, however, great when used properly. It does not have the same level of security, availability, access, or recoverability as anything listed above. …
Chose Microsoft Access
Access is more robust than Excel in terms of data-centricity and robustness. It however isn't meant to support an enterprise-level use case like SQL Server is. That sweet spot in the middle (a departmental solution that requires more than Excel can offer) is the sweet spot for …
SAP Cloud ERP
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
Pricing element can be configured to reflect various scenarions, stability and scalability of SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
Oracle is complicated and difficult and complex to maintain where as SAP S/4HANA Cloud is easy to maintain and user friendly interns of administration.
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
The SAP S/4HANA Cloud in-memory feature makes SAP S/4HANA Cloud much faster than previous storage based databases. Also, with storage based databases there is frequently a need to expand drives or add SAN drives which leads to extra expense. We selected SAP S/4HANA Cloud …
Microsoft SQL Server
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft Access while a data tool cannot scale to number of concurrent users or the great amount of files needed to run a business. Microsoft Access can attach to sql server as a backend but the interface is still limited to less than 20 concurrent users at a time.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL is slower than MySQL and Access but far more feature-rich and reliable. Access is almost obsolete nowadays, so not too many people are considering it, but unless budget or an open-source ethos is a factor, Microsoft SQL is superior in every way. Many commonly used …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
All of the platforms have their own benefit. I was not the decision maker in selecting Microsoft SQL Server, as it was already being utilized when I joined the company, 7 years ago. I can say that I feel more comfortable with utilizing this platform as opposed to the other ones.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
The free version is very powerfull and easy to install and use for small companies.
Going to Professional and Standard, gives you all the support and the flexibility needed. It is known within the Database Administrator crew, and you can get support very easily over the …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
I use Crystal and Microsoft SQL Server with each other. Each has a unique role that it brings to every query. Microsoft SQL Server allows me to write and refine my base query. Crystal allows me to take that query and make it more visually appealing and easier to interpret.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
SQL server is a better software because of its support by Microsoft and it's data table pop up function. Also it has pivot function that others lack.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
SQL Server is a better choice for quick time to market solutions and for easier maintenance. Oracle Database setup and programming to support solutions has a harder learning curve and it requires more time and effort to hit the ground running.

An organization having invested …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
I started working with databases many years ago with Access, which allows you to create relational database and provide an old-fashioned desktop interface. I had a look at Oracle but I never had the opportunity to get to the bottom (also because of the budget that had the …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Access is simply too small and the options too slim for our current needs.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Years ago I used Oracle and Oracle Data Integrator and I hated it. It was cumbersome and archaic and I couldn't believe the product could be so popular. Given a database related task and a choice between Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server, SQL Server wins hands down in ease of use, …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
I have used Microsoft Access, MySQL, and I have been a user of systems that run on Oracle database servers. All but Oracle are really intended for smaller scale projects and teams as they start to get slow or the performance will suffer once you start getting lots of data input …
Features
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
7.7
3 Ratings
3% below category average
SAP Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
ACID compliance7.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database locking8.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption7.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Disaster recovery7.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple datatypes8.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
407 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pay calculation00 Ratings7.8357 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.9345 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.6344 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
625 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.8599 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings7.6552 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
720 Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings8.4677 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.1709 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
727 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings7.7672 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.8714 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.6660 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
750 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.2729 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.2694 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings7.9247 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.0260 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.0279 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.0255 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings8.3287 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
627 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking00 Ratings8.3613 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.9531 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings7.9506 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
639 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pricing00 Ratings8.0609 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings8.0619 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings9.024 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.2584 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.9208 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.5
273 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Billing Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.9246 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings7.5208 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.0267 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.3
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
114 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings8.1114 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.9
226 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.8155 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.9159 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.7154 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.1202 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings8.0200 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.8
1 Ratings
39% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Risk Repository00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.0
182 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.1160 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.9155 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings7.7143 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.0147 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
177 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings8.2160 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings8.3162 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.2152 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings8.1157 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.1157 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.8
212 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.7188 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.0203 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.7192 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Access
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.0
193 Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Proposal Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.0193 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(99 ratings)
8.3
(711 ratings)
8.0
(107 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(15 ratings)
9.5
(17 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(5 ratings)
8.0
(605 ratings)
7.6
(17 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(5 ratings)
6.6
(78 ratings)
7.9
(26 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(9 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft AccessSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
As a Material Purchasing/Planning/inventory tracking application, Microsoft Access serves its purpose well. It's presentation is clean, data entry is simple and the ability to customize search fields is welcome. It does, however, come with some caveats; namely, when setting search filters and the need arises to back up a step or two, with Microsoft Access you have to reset, or "clear all", adding extra steps/time to a query.
Read full review
SAP
Does well Manufacturing companies - E2E integration. Product Costing integration with manufacturing. Order to Cash - E2E integration, Joule, and openness to integrating third-party products. Less appropriate AI capabilities - competition is moving faster. E2E professional services business as business is evolving faster, and new ideas are coming in at a fast pace.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft SQL is ubiquitous, while MySQL runs under the hood all over the place. Microsoft SQL is the platform taught in colleges and certification courses and is the one most likely to be used by businesses because it is backed by Microsoft. Its interface is friendly (well, as pleasant as SQL can be) and has been used by so many for so long that resources are freely available if you encounter any issues.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Very easy to create entity-relationship diagrams for various tables and designing mock layouts.
  • Really easy to navigate as it hold[s] the classic Microsoft UI. Another good thing is that it comes with the complete MS Office Suite.
  • It is really fast when joining multiple tables no matter what type of join.
  • Works on pretty much same SQL scripts so no need to learn a new language!
Read full review
SAP
  • The software helps in forecasting and identifying potential challenges that would affect our organisation in the near future. This enables us to prepare in advance and also adopt practical and viable measures.
  • It enables faster and accurate data processing, which enhances decision-making.
  • It's easily customizable according to specific organizational needs. This promotes overall efficiency and productivity of the organization.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
  • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
  • Data Security
  • Easy to understand and use
  • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Access has not really changed at all for several years. It might be nice to see some upgrades and changes.
  • The help info is often not helpful. Need more tutorials for Microsoft Access to show how to do specific things.
  • Be careful naming objects such as tables, forms, etc. Names that are too long can get cut off in dialog boxes to choose a table, form, report, etc. So, I wish they would have resizable dialog boxes to allow you to see objects with long names.
  • I wish it could show me objects that are not in use in the database for current queries, tables, reports, forms, and macros. That way unused objects can be deleted without worrying about losing a report or query because you deleted the underlying object.
Read full review
SAP
  • The beginner's user-friendly UI can help learners learn easily, and it feels a bit complex.
  • Implementation of AI bot on common tasks.
  • There are no offline functionality that users can use remotely.
  • As the scalability of the products grows, they become more expensive.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise edition has a high cost but is the only edition which supports SQL Always On Availability Groups. It would be nice to include this feature in the Standard version.
  • Licensing of Microsoft SQL Server is a quite complex matter, it would be good to simplify licensing in the future. For example, per core vs per user CAL licensing, as well as complex licensing scenarios in the Cloud and on Edge locations.
  • It would be good to include native tools for converting Oracle, DB2, Postgresql and MySQL/MariaDB databases (schema and data) for import into Microsoft SQL Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.
Read full review
SAP
The cost of SAP as an ERP is quite high and the switching costs associated with ERP systems are even higher. That being said moving from one ERP to another only happens once in a great while for large organizations. Those switching costs include retraining, IT hardware requirements, outside consultants and more
Read full review
Microsoft
We understand that the Microsoft SQL Server will continue to advance, offering the same robust and reliable platform while adding new features that enable us, as a software center, to create a superior product. That provides excellent performance while reducing the hardware requirements and the total cost of ownership of our solution.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.
Read full review
SAP
Day to day data insight is more accurate for manufacturing industry to procure as per forecasted from supplier. Supply and fulfillment cycle becomes more easier. I would say more about performance as we are using this new server so we can see clear difference between SAP S/4HANA Cloud and ECC. Also it has customized business extensions for rapid development.
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Its does not have outages.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.
Read full review
SAP
The support system I find great as whenever I run into problems they rectify them quickly as possible they never reacted late the support is just up to the mark for me. They provide many solutions to the problems I faced the [technical] team support is always amazing they [listen] to mean work accordingly.
Read full review
Microsoft
We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
More effective
Read full review
Microsoft
It was good
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
very hands on and detailed training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access
Read full review
SAP
SAP requires
a lot of internal and external resources to complete its successful
implementation. The cloud version requires a deeper understanding of the
different capabilities of the local systems (hardware) and the connection
towards your local IT team. We found several problems on our systems that we
couldn't foresee before the implementation and roll out.
Read full review
Microsoft
Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Excel is a fantastic - robust application that can do so much so easily. Its easy to train and understand. However - excel does not provide a reporting function and that is typically where we will suggest a move to [Microsoft] Access. [Microsoft] Access requires a little more knowledge of data manipulation.
Read full review
SAP
The platform utilizes advanced predictive analytics to anticipate operational bottlenecks and put them out of commission before the problems become larger. We can proactively develop effective strategies that help keep service quality in the face of unexpected changes in the market, or external disruptions, by continuously analyzing historical performance data as well as elements of the current market
Read full review
Microsoft
[Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Not having to recreate queries or reports every time you want to use them.
  • Once an item is created and saved as part of the database, you save manpower by not having to recreate them.
  • ROI from a usability standpoint is great. Solid product with great functionality that requires low maintenance usually.
Read full review
SAP
  • The financial management part ensures every process is well planned and allocated resources are used efficiently.
  • The development of payroll management ensures that all employees are happily remunerated and, hence, very productive.
  • The creation of solid financial reporting acts as the primary driver in decision-making, which brings more insights into development.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
  • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
  • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Cloud ERP Screenshots

Screenshot of the Order to Cash Dashboard - For the management of the order-to-cash process more efficiently across revenue streams and business models - including sales of physical and digital goods, services, subscriptions, projects, and bundles.Screenshot of a Sales Management Overview - Helps ensure sales reps meet their goals with an overview of orders and key sales performance metrics, with status tracking for each order in real time for the early detection of potential issues.Screenshot of the Purchasing Spend Dashboard - For weighing various aspects of purchasing spend through quick access to clear, complete, and real-time data, with less risk, and without opening different reports and transactions.Screenshot of Operational Supplier Evaluation - Provides a transparent overview of suppliers. Users can approve the most reliable vendors and get the right mix to serve business needs while reducing risk.Screenshot of Inventory Management - Provides visibility to manage supply chains, to mitigate risk, avoid unnecessary costs, maximize efficiency, and fulfill customer orders on time.Screenshot of Inventory Processing - Enables real-time supply chain visibility and provides meaningful metrics, with customizable dashboards and reports that display real-time inventory that track the status of inbound and outbound deliveries.