Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score6.9 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.
Enterprise Products Chief in Information Technology at CELISTICS (Logistics and Supply Chain, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Accounts Payable Manager in Finance and Accounting at e+CancerCare (Hospital & Health Care, 201-500 employees)
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle
Verified User
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
JD Edwards Enterprise is more robust than NetSuite or MSD GP. It has significantly more experience in the field. However, it's also an aging application and not nearly as agile as those two. I've also found resources to be less expensive with a broader knowledge of the …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
11 Ratings
0% below category average
Pay calculation
6.219 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
5.815 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.518 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
16 Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration
2.526 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.021 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
40 Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
21 Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability
5.532 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.140 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
8.021 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.3
41 Ratings
38% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
18 Ratings
2% above category average
Dashboards
3.429 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
Standard reports
6.139 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Custom reports
6.439 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
48 Ratings
42% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
23 Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable
6.345 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.736 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
Cash management
6.336 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
5.541 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
4.431 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
4.428 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
2.619 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
3.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
4.721 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
3.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
4.526 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
8.017 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
2.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.517 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
8.016 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
3.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.119 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
7.019 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.2
26 Ratings
54% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
16 Ratings
1% below category average
Inventory tracking
5.524 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
7.016 Ratings
Automatic reordering
1.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Location management
4.018 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
10.014 Ratings
Manufacturing module
3.515 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
25 Ratings
69% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
17 Ratings
10% below category average
Pricing
3.718 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
8.016 Ratings
Order entry
3.721 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
9.016 Ratings
Credit card processing
1.012 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
6.88 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.025 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
8.113 Ratings
Order Orchestration
4.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
3.312 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
3.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
21 Ratings
8% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
8.015 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
7.018 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
5.710 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
8.916 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
5.38 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
6.88 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
6.99 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
7.56 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
6 Ratings
1% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
9 Ratings
7% below category average
Production Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
4.38 Ratings
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.86 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
13 Ratings
15% below category average
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.410 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
6 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
13 Ratings
3% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
4.36 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.55 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.011 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.23 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.73 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
10 Ratings
1% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.55 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info