Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The SAP Signavio portfolio offers an integrated platform that helps usersto realign the organization and bring changes, with a suite of products that support business processes. The SAP Signavio portfolio offers a range of business transformation solutions to serve the emerging practice of customer excellence (CEX). SAP Signavio solutions bring together a full 360-degree view of outside-in and inside-out thinking, translating experiences into operational reality by putting the customer at the…
N/A
Pricing
Miro
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Signavio feels rigid and more difficult to learn - Miro is more user-friendly.
Microsoft Visio - this was a very easy tool to use and loved the hot keys to create objects on the fly. Miro is also easy, but maybe I just have more to learn about hot keys and incorporate those …
The flexibility of Miro in designing, collaborating and creating content that the customer understands is a big plus. All the features that Miro delivers are beneficial and available for us. Miro is really focused on collaboration and creating content which makes the …
In my personal experience, Mural's feature set is not as comprehensive as Miro's and although it's easy to use, it's not as creative a tool as Miro can be. Miro can perform Mural's functions and more. Additionally Miro is now completely integrated and Mural is still considered a …
Signavio loses in process mining capability against Celonis in many areas like usability and look and feel. Signavio is superior in its BPM related capabilities against e.g. QPR and MS Visio due to its feature set. Against all of them Signavio has better overall solution suite …
We were able to end the use of archive versions thanks to SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, and everyone has access to the most recent archive. Mac and Windows users can collaborate on a single document. A design tool that spans the concept phase, design phase, and …
I couldn't find any scenarios where Miro is not appropriate. I use it day by day and create processes and visual boards, and use it for any type of project that I implement. It's very easy to navigate and very easy to actually create it from scratch, so most scenarios that I used Miro for were:
to design the customer journey, process design for different types of processes (like an onboarding process or a community implementation or a customer portal tool implementation) to document new workflows that I'm building. It applies across all customer operations roles, even if the tool wasn't built for customer operations. I used it so far in the past five years or so in more than five or six job titles that I had with different functions and hats, and supported me during all these job functions that I managed
Pros: 1. It reduces technical debt and accelerates a smooth transition, while harmonizing across data migration regions which replaces the legacy customization that are not for S4/HANA. 2. It cuts operational cost by 30% - 40% and improves SLA adherence, while process intelligence identifies duplicate or redundant approval steps when we know SAP ecosystems ties all modules together for better data insights. Cons: 1. Complicated and costly for small businesses. 2. Mature process required for better data feeding and data insights. 3. If non-SAP system data feed might cause misleading and incomplete data insights
Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Location agnostic (or home office agnostic) collaboration in virtual workshops
Internally within the team or with clients, I can prepare, gather materials, and lead during a workshop or meeting with SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite and feel incredibly positioned as the facilitator. Whether in real time or in an asynchronous manner.
The combination of highly adaptable and visual work with collaborative tools like forms, comments, timers, and point voting transforms it into a tool I use frequently.
Text and size formatting - when you copy and paste items they come through tiny (always keep the paste to scale of what the rest of the project scale is
Excel linking - I want to be able to integrate excel documentations for prototyping ideas
Some extra templates and start up positions - just so it allows the user to be more creative (maybe a draw template option, so the AI can create you a template bespoke to you company)
For businesses looking to improve their current business processes, I think SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite is incredibly well-suited.
In my opinion, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite excels in sectors with strict regulatory requirements.
I think SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite is the best option when teams from several departments must work together on process design or improvement initiatives because of its real-time collaboration capabilities.
I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
I find Miro an overall easy to use tool, but I think that it needs more tutorials to fully onboard users. As a first time user, I find it difficult to understand some of the logics of the navigation and how grouping worked. So, I think that having short and well defined "introduction video hacks" can make onboarding in the tool enjoyable and capture more usage.
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
I gave SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite support this rating because, in my experience, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite has Great support
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Training is taking way longer than expected. We have had more than 50 hours of training and still do not feel proficient enough to do anything meaningful with Process Intelligence. The Process Insights are pretty intuitive but does take a willingness to dig in and explore, but in general good right out of the box.
I’ve used both Excalidraw+ and draw.io. Excalidraw+ is great for quick, lightweight sketches with a clean “hand-drawn” feel, but it’s less strong for running structured workshops at scale (facilitation tools, templates, board organization, stakeholder-friendly presentation). draw.io is solid for precise diagramming (flows, architecture), but collaboration and workshop mechanics feel more “diagram-first” than “team-first.” We chose Miro because it combines strong real-time + async collaboration with facilitation features (voting, timer, stickies), easy board structuring with frames, and presentation mode—so we can go from messy ideation to a shareable narrative without switching tools.
We were able to end the use of archive versions thanks to SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, and everyone has access to the most recent archive. Mac and Windows users can collaborate on a single document. A design tool that spans the concept phase, design phase, and delivery to engineering
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
With the help of Signavio, we are now much more operationally efficient, which saves money and makes better use of our resources.
The software's emphasis on collaboration has encouraged innovation within our teams, resulting in original solutions and better project outputs.
Compliance is crucial for our sector. We have lowered the danger of regulatory problems by maintaining stringent compliance standards with the aid of Signavio.
