TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A

    ProcessMaker

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    60%
    Would buy again
    3 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    60%
    Happy with the feature set
    3 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Documentum and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of OpenText Documentum and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    8% above category average
    API for custom integration00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of OpenText Documentum and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.6
    11 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings8.811 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings8.811 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of OpenText Documentum and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.8
    10 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings8.28 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings7.88 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings8.28 Ratings
    Business Process Automation
    Comparison of Business Process Automation features of OpenText Documentum and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Business Process Modeling00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Decision Modeling00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Code-Based Automation00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    No-Code Automation00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (5 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText DocumentumProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
    • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
    • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    We are happy with this product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
    • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
    • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots