PandaDoc vs. Responsive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PandaDoc
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs.
$35
per month per seat
Responsive
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
PandaDocResponsive
Editions & Modules
Starter
$35
per month per seat
Business
$65
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PandaDocResponsive
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PandaDocResponsive
Considered Both Products
PandaDoc
Chose PandaDoc
I've only used PandaDoc and CPQ.
Responsive

No answer on this topic

Features
PandaDocResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
PandaDoc
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Proposal branding00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Proposal templates00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
PandaDoc
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
22 Ratings
5% below category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
PandaDoc
-
Ratings
Responsive
8.0
16 Ratings
2% above category average
Proposal distribution00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Interactive proposals00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PandaDocResponsive
Small Businesses
Foxit eSign
Foxit eSign
Score 9.0 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
DocuSign
DocuSign
Score 8.7 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PandaDocResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(329 ratings)
9.3
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(18 ratings)
8.7
(17 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(23 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.6
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.1
(23 ratings)
9.8
(17 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.3
(4 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
2.8
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(20 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.7
(20 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
6.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PandaDocResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
PandaDoc
Best suited for after demonstrations when requested by the prospect when they are looking for pricing with T&C. The data room is also great that acts like a drop box for opportunities and their contacts. Helps share pertinent information with others in the organization.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
PandaDoc
  • Allows clients to remotely execute documents.
  • Tracks the progress of document execution.
  • Emails clients to remind them to sign documents so we don't have to follow up.
  • Emails us when documents have been fully executed.
  • Provides an easy-to use interface to place signatures, dates, and other information on our forms.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
PandaDoc
  • Sometimes the fillable fields don't automatically map properly and you have to manually adjust.
  • Plan tiers and pricing recently changed, so now we get less value and less features (limited templates, no more pricing tables or invoicing/connected payment) for the same price, which is pricy for a small business.
  • Easier, integrated invoicing as an included feature (so we don't have to use a different software for invoicing/payment collection) would be ideal. You have to upgrade to the Business Plan for this.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
PandaDoc
The reason I gave it a rating of 7 is because it's probable, but not for sure. This is because there are a few little things we don't love about pandadoc. Mostly that there is not conditional logic such as: they must either fill this field out OR this one. Also it's a little pricey. But we'll probably stay because it's good enough and a pain to switch to something new
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up!
Read full review
Usability
PandaDoc
Once you get the hang of it, it's very easy to use. There can be a slightly steep learning curve to get fully in on the system. The new editor v2 has really improved usability and allows us to collaborate on documents simultaneously. Once the templates and library items are set up, a new document, whether it be a sales or HR document, takes very little time to complete.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
PandaDoc
We haven't had any real issues regarding downtime as of yet.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Performance
PandaDoc
The documents load quickly for the most part but sometimes if there are larger documents with a high number of variables it could take a bit longer to get the document to show up. Most of the time the document comes on the screen relatively quickly allowing for quick access to documents to be edited and sent out.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
PandaDoc
Recently I could not upload a pdf to a contract - support was very responsive and easy to work with. They got back to me the next day with an apparent fix - however when I opened the document nothing had changed. I then could not respond to the rep who was helping me because it was a "no-reply address", the problem still has not been solved and we had to make alternate arrangements to get this to the client. Never had it happen before and was only with this one contract.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
PandaDoc
Implementation was before the time I was here at Riafox, however, support has been great in assisting to merge spaces and upgrade to 2.0 Editor.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
PandaDoc
We used Dropbox back when it was still HelloSign. At the time, new templates were very hard to create. We had to upload a PDF and then add the fields from there. With PandaDoc, we are able to drag and drop the text, images, logos, and fields we need easily. This has saved our team an immense amount of time.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning.
Read full review
Scalability
PandaDoc
It's scalable
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
PandaDoc
  • We have greatly increased the efficiency in which we can get signatures from individuals for documents and increase productivity.
  • We have been able to find older documents very easily.
  • W-9 have been very difficult due to Section 3, but this was addressed with conditional logic
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • I don't have access to the actual ROI data, but we would continue to invest in RFPIO as a company only if it were providing us with the results to win RFPs.
  • RFPIO makes the task of filling out RFP responses much faster for me.
  • RFPIO helps our team be able to divide out RFP chores easily, because we know we all have access to the same high-quality source for information.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PandaDoc Screenshots

Screenshot of some of the custom-designed themes, templates, embedded rich media, and interactivity to give every deal the opportunity to get noticed.Screenshot of automatic notifications, on-the-fly editing, CRM Integrations, and integrated eSignatures.Screenshot of reporting, with drill down to the deal level with proposals, to pick which deals to include (or exclude).Screenshot of legally binding eSignaturesScreenshot of centralized communications to streamline the negotiation process, and make revisions in real-time in a single location.Screenshot of document analytics that display what’s really happening after documents are sent with real-time reporting on engagement and activity on the documents. This enables teams to respond faster to prospects.