Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Pipefy
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Pipefy headquartered in San Francisco offers their process management and workflow software providing processes for customer success, service desk, sales operations, and other processes.
$22
per user, per month*
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$0
per month per user
Pricing
PipefyWrike
Editions & Modules
Business
$22
per user, per month*
Enterprise
$36
per user, per month*
Unlimited
Custom
Starter
Free
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PipefyWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*Discounts available for annual billing.Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PipefyWrike
Considered Both Products
Pipefy
Chose Pipefy
We started using software we already had (such as Slack and Sheets) but this software is not actually ideal to manage processes, which led to errors, miscommunication, and execution problems. Trello is good for managing demand but offers no process customization or approval and …
Chose Pipefy
Pipefy is very process-oriented and not task or project-oriented. Other tools might offer different views such as the Gantt chart that makes a lot of sense if the project you are working on requires it. But Pipefy is better when the complexity of the process demands automation …
Chose Pipefy
Trello is a much simpler tool in general ways, it does not provide nearly 1/100 of the customization from papery. Also, Trello seems to be stuck in the past, the design never got refreshed, and on Pipefy, they are constantly keeping up the design fresh and beautiful.
Chose Pipefy
Pipefy was suggested by our new developer and we switched from Freshdesk. It was a lot better looking and easy to navigate. We used Google Forms at first but that isn't really what you should be using to keep track of bugs. Freshdesk focused more on the outside of the …
Chose Pipefy
I used Pipedrive at another company to organize quotes. I really liked the software but it wasn't what I was looking for for our company.
Wrike
Chose Wrike
Wrike does not compare with anything I've used in the past, everything can be managed in one platform across your Organization.
Chose Wrike
I used them and was satisfied.

Li ho usati e sono rimasto soddisfatto
Chose Wrike
Asana provides user friendly interface and suitable platform for software engineering teams. But Wrike stood out because it provides good balance of project planning, workflow automation and dashboard functionalities in a single place.
Chose Wrike
Wrike was better in terms of task layout and project setup/organization.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is much simpler to use and customize.
Chose Wrike
Wrike has a broader application than task management apps like Toggl or Todoist. I do use Toggl as a basic time tracking software, however Wrike covers more ground. It is robust and user-friendly, and much less expensive than MS Project.
Chose Wrike
We used RoboHead prior to Wrike for document control and project management. Wrike is by far more advanced and interactive. It gives us so many more opportunities for communication.
Chose Wrike
Wrike's UI, combined with its low-cost solutions, has been the standout factor compared to the other options sought. They have multiple license types suited to different usage, a standout compared to others that don't leave you stuck paying high license fees for licenses you …
Chose Wrike
I utilized basecamp at my last position and I just remember it was extremely limited in what you could do. If I remember correctly there was no workflow integration of the platform, it was essentially just an app that you could create folders in that housed all of the files. No …
Chose Wrike
Cost and functionality. We were able to gain consensus on Wrike across numerous stakeholders. It may not be the best at everything but it's capable at a wide range of things.
Chose Wrike
Wrike was more capable that ProWorkflow (at least when we compared them several years ago) and more team/smaller workflow real time oriented than MS Project - where Project is better for detailed PM work. ClickUp is far more flexible and better value for a similar price at the …
Chose Wrike
our past products have been so hard to customize, streamline, and make work for all types of roles in the company. i feel like wrike is a great fit for everyone to work together well.
Chose Wrike
I don't have experience looking into other similar products.
Chose Wrike
Honestly for me, it depends what you’re utilizing these tools for. In my experience, some of the other project management tools I’ve used the past such as Jira are way too complex for the use case we run into with our business. I feel like the overall goal of Wrike is to …
Chose Wrike
I think Wrike is very similar to other project management platforms such as Monday, Asana and Teamwork that I have used before. As they all provide strong tools for task and project organization, one feature particularly liked by me in TW was its time-tracking functionality, …
Chose Wrike
I've used Airtable for my other marketing job and for other organizational work, but I like how much you can get out of Wrike.
Chose Wrike
I only used Asana pretty briefly, but my recollection is that it was a lot more rigid compared to Wrike.
Chose Wrike
Monday wasn't as customizable as Wrike. Basecamp is great for tracking simple tasks and communicating with outside agencies, but isn't complex enough to track projects. Smartsheet is basically a fancy spreadsheet.
Chose Wrike
We have been using Wrike for over seven years, so I don't recall the specific reason why we chose it over Asana. I recall that the functions were similar, but I think we found that Wrike offered flexibility and structure that we felt would function the best for our department.
Chose Wrike
It wasn't my choice but I do feel like there are more options within Wrike
Chose Wrike
Todoist is great for a personal task manager. However, it can not track time like you can in Wrike. Todoist also continues to rise in cost.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is more robust and suited for enterprise teams. Learning curve is more difficult and involved. Other platforms you can learn in a day or two. Wrike takes a month or two to get the hang of
Chose Wrike
Monday is a easier for project management and task tracking. Where Wrike excels is with the ticketing system for our IT, legal, or other specific teams.
Features
PipefyWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Pipefy
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Pipefy
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PipefyWrike
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PipefyWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PipefyWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Pipefy is very well suited if you have a team doing any sort of process... for real! It simplified everything from our sales and marketing objectives/processes, to our onboarding and accounting side of things. Since you can share different pipes with others, it's easy to see where others are at in the process and move the card along while keeping others informed. It makes sure you don't miss any information or steps along the way, which is great if your process is detail-oriented. It is a little less appropriate for marketing efforts, but we still try to use it to keep track of things in a central space. Definitely best suited for sales, technical things, and accounting.
Read full review
I believe it's well suited if you have multiple jobs/projects that you need to keep organized. We work with multiple job types from print/creative to web, copy and digital ads so it helps us stay organized. I don't think it would be suitable for a company that doesn't have a lot of jobs to manage. We average over 1,200 requests a year.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility on process management.
  • Internal automations and connections to different data bases and boards.
  • Easily connection with external programs through API's.
Read full review
  • Keeps projects on track
  • Provides tools that make editing and reviewing tasks much easier
  • Helps our team work effectively and efficiently despite many of us being remote workers
  • Visually accessible on multiple platforms which makes it easy to do work from anywhere
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like to be able to add a due date without a time attached.
  • I would like to see completed tasks be deleted after a set amount of time.
Read full review
  • Email alerts sometimes send too slowly.
  • If you put a project on hold, it can be hard to find it once you are ready to return to it.
  • Sometimes there are too many steps/tasks and the main page can get cluttered.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It does take some time and work to really understand and use it properly, but I think the accessibility to help and documentation make that completely feasible. Once you know how to use it, I find it to be very user-friendly, and have very few complaints.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Pipefy support is pretty good. There were a few instances where the agent didn't really understand what I was trying to get help with, but that was only once. Every other time it has been pretty fast and efficient. They are also very kind and understanding. I don't think they need much help in that dept
Read full review
Time and time again, Wrike has proved that they listen to their customers and put us first. From sales to support - they are quick to respond, encourcage community engagement and I never feel like i am callling a help center
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We started using software we already had (such as Slack and Sheets) but this software is not actually ideal to manage processes, which led to errors, miscommunication, and execution problems. Trello is good for managing demand but offers no process customization or approval and Jira is too focused on development for our needs, and also hard to customize.
Read full review
Wrike's UI, combined with its low-cost solutions, has been the standout factor compared to the other options sought. They have multiple license types suited to different usage, a standout compared to others that don't leave you stuck paying high license fees for licenses you won't use to that extent.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I’d go with a 9/10. It scales really well across teams and use cases, especially once you set things up properly. The only reason it’s not a full 10 is that it can take some effort to structure everything cleanly at the start.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We were able to register and manage over 5 thousand transactions in the first 2 years of our startup.
  • It compiled more than 5,000 contacts for present and future campaigns.
  • It's the back office for our startup.
Read full review
  • Allow us to plan, execute, track, and effortlessly achieve the completion of all projects before the deadline.
  • Great team collaboration that enhances team productivity and efficiency.
  • Provide real time project status and progress easily.
  • Projects stay well organized and assigning tasks to right people is simple.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows