Quickbase vs. Workamajig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Quickbase
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Quickbase helps users tackle any project, no matter how complex. Quickbase helps customers see, connect and control complex projects. Whether it’s raising a skyscraper or coordinating vaccine rollouts, the no-code software platform allows business users to custom fit solutions to the way they work – using information from across the systems they already have.
$700
per month
Workamajig
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
Full Customizable
per month/billed annually
Business
Starting at $2,200
per month
Team
Started at $700
per month
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQuickbase offers three key plans, with feature distinction, simple and consistent entitlements, and a flexible licensing model, giving users the option of either user based or usage based licensing across all 3 plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Considered Both Products
Quickbase
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase is pretty easy to use, user friendly and simple dashboard. Anyone can easily use Quickbase without any prior knowledge. This is efficient and fast performer. You can prioritize task easily . You can manage lifecycle of prospects effectively . Good reporting features …
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase allows us to be the driver and designer.
Chose Quickbase
Microsoft tools are functional but they are not necessarily created for scalability. As our contract scaled, we needed something that had the capability to consolidate data as well as handle more and more amounts of data and analysis. Quickbsae has also helped us stop working …
Chose Quickbase
I picked Quickbase before investigating the low-code no-code market because I was so impressed. I did a pricing exercise a couple years ago because Quickbase was drastically increasing the cost and decreasing our allotments/features. We could have saved a lot of money by going …
Chose Quickbase
Some will tell me they don't use Quickbase because they already have Excel. I always take that opportunity to explain how they're missing out by not converting that Excel sheet (which takes less than 1 minute to convert) into a Quickbase tool. The functionality that Quickbase …
Chose Quickbase
Compare to excel Quickbase is having so many advanced features which help users to solve different scenarios of real time problem. excel can only store and sort the data according to our request. Pipelines, notifications, reports, charts, formulas, forms these are the advanced …
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase stacks up against them because it's speed of delivery is not only important for development but also for true change and lifetime, which are remarkable tools.
Chose Quickbase
Out of the box softwares come with out of the box assumptions that are difficult to mold your workflow to so companies generally adapt part of their workflow to how the software works and then when that fails revert to doing it outside of any system. Quickbase does the opposite …
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase is highly flexible for application development. Other vendors also provide customization options, but Quickbase is preferred because it is more flexible and provides more custom options. Also, Quickbase is preferred because it is easier for data handling. Other …
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase was selected before I can onboard, but it's flexibility definitely suite our business needs.
Chose Quickbase
Flexibility of the tool, licensing structure, and detailed permission controls.
Chose Quickbase
We've looked at Microsoft Power Applications and use them where appropriate but its limited and they are not as agile or as clean looking as Quickbase and requires more build time to deliver similar outcomes.
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase is much more user-friendly and responsive than RedTeam, and seems to be more cost-effective, as well.
Chose Quickbase
Ideagen Quality Management and ETQ Reliance QMS
Chose Quickbase
Quickbase is highly rated and overall the accessibility and ROI was deemed to be better
Chose Quickbase
Used access in a previous company which required specific knowledge of the system. Quickbase was learnt from scratch in a matter of weeks.
Chose Quickbase
So we do have also access to the power suite of tools, but I mean, I'll say I prefer Quickbase over else.
Chose Quickbase
Well, there's a plethora of low-code tools out on the marketplace and, you know, there's a reason that we've decided to partner with QuickBase because it has all the right balance of the ability to integrate with the ability for a citizen developer to create apps successfully. …
Chose Quickbase
I've never used anything that does quite what QuickBase does, not something that's fully integrated with everything else.
Chose Quickbase
QuickBase is really the first product like itself that I've used. I mean, granted I lived and breathed in Excel in my past career, and being able to see what you do in Excel and bring it to life in a totally different aspect to an application in QuickBase is just taking it to a …
Workamajig
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on …
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig definitely isn't the prettiest among the project management tools I've used, nor does it have the friendliest UX/UI. But it does have some advantages when it comes to automating tasks in a schedule, automatically replacing versions of files with the same name and …
Chose Workamajig
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Chose Workamajig
WMJ is a fully integrated system. Accounting, time management, invoicing, project management, estimating, sales CRM, all occur in one integrated package. This is ultimately why we selected WMJ. Other packages do portions of the workflow well but don't always integrate via …
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was definitely a lot easier to keep track of projects, timesheets, and out of office calendars all in one. ClickUp and Zoho were good for project management but JIG definitely has more to offer and it's a little easier to clean. Keeping track of campaigns is much …
Chose Workamajig
Personally WMJ is my least favorite project management program of those I've used in jobs past, but it was not my decision to use it and I believe our company has been utilizing it for many, many years. To be fair and put this in perspective, my interactions with WMJ probably …
Chose Workamajig
Customization and Project Request submission were two of the biggest draws that our organization valued back when our contract with Workamajig started. Those two features were deemed more important than some of its inadequacies. However, the project management products have …
Chose Workamajig
Daylite is not as robust of a program but their mobile options are far superior and are best for smaller companies.
Chose Workamajig
The UI is probably the worst I have used. The redundancy in completing tasks is annoying. I did not choose this product.
Features
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
Ratings
45% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Workamajig
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Small Businesses
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.3 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
QuickbaseWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
Quickbase has proven that if it's in a spreadsheet, it really should be in Quickbase. One of my more recent achievements with the program was redesigning our current process for notifying management of something irregular. The old process had all the notification infrastructure built behind the scenes with only a handful of people knowing and understanding the process. The new process was able to clean up the behind-the-scenes and also provide an increased level of intuitiveness by allowing complete visibility and customization of notification recipients. This allows the initial notification to reach a select number of management individuals who can then decide whether or not it needs to be escalated, all while allowing the operations personnel to get back to work immediately. The biggest issue I've found with the program is the limitation of the user - I find that the biggest roadblock in my way is myself, as I am confident the program has the ability to accomplish what I need, but am I skilled enough to create it? This has helped me become very proficient in only one year of use and become more active in community engagement surrounding the program.
Read full review
I think this holds true to almost any CRM, but if you want to truly utilize it you sort of need to go all in. This can become tough with WMJ because it doesn't offer some critical options that many other CRMs do, like the ability to create and send emails, e-newsletters, to throttle and invite outside clients to look at projects, etc. As such we're pairing Workamajig with Hubspot (and slowly phasing out Mailchimp) and trying to keep the data clean and flowing between them all is pretty tough. I'm also not aware of any API bridge from Wordpress to Workamajig so while I can program and feed my leads from my site into the other spaces, Workamajig remains a manual entry for any insertions you want, even if simply as a CSV import.
But - if you're not worried about that and simply want to manage projects, budget time, and scope things, it's a robust system allowing you to do so.
Read full review
Pros
  • Rapidly bring new ideas to life
  • Great authentication and authorization system out of the box
  • Connects with many major third-party services (via Pipelines)
  • Reporting and Dashboards are awesome
  • Excellent emails notification system to keep us in the loop when data changes
  • Intuitive UI for building forms and reports
  • Nice playground to test new ideas
Read full review
  • WMJ is a full-stack solution, so you can track the life of a project from beginning to end, and all of the financials associated with it.
  • Time entry is easy.
  • Project management is robust and yields a tremendous amount of information.
  • WMJ has a "sheets"-based interface, which makes navigating thru modules easier.
  • There is more than one way to complete any particular task.
Read full review
Cons
  • Pipelines - being able to share them or have permissions based viewing capabilities
  • Table size limits are small for really large apps. While I agree that there needs to be a cap on the size, it would be nice to adjust it up when needed.
Read full review
  • Auto-schedule population - The most inconvenient thing about using JIG was that the dates wouldn't auto-populate. Example: I move the review date but the rest of the dates stay the same. Depending on each project level, if one date is adjusted the rest should update as well. That way we aren't spending a lot of time moving dates around manually.
  • Notifications - JIG should have desktop notifications so we can see when tasks are on us even when we aren't in JIG.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are growing our user base and getting more out of this system. Quick Base will continue to grow with our company as more of our users become super users and are capable of developing new features and solutions. We're getting more and more interested from departments that are hearing of our successes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Quick Base has done everything we have asked it to do and then some. Our original goal was to have one system for CRM that encompassed both the sales process and the customer management. We have gone w-a-y beyond that with analytics, project management, system bug logging, and historical effort reporting.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
I gave it a 10, but it should be a 9.99. They do a nice job of keeping the application running. The application can drag a bit when you have thousands of users accessing the application concurrently. We experienced this with large scale implementations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Some of our tables that hold over a million records are starting to perform poorly, with some summaries taking over 20 seconds to load. This may be an indication that it is best to archive old data when reaching large volumes like this.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
If you utilize the community, the support is amazing. Unfortunately, I find their actual support system a bit underwhelming. They don't seem to have a great process for interacting directly with an issue and often sweep significant issues under the rug by categorizing them as "Enhancement" ideas or legacy items.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
It is very easy to get training from their University portal and still if we don't know their, then we can ask their support too.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Quick Base already is having a separate portal of providing training to customers and it is very easy to use and updates as per the new features added in to the application
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I was not directly involved with the initial account implementation, only a bystander. For the app I directly implemented for my department only, I wish I had know to create an app diagram first. I don't remember if that was suggested. I think that would be a great help tip tool when a new app is created, to have a page with a check list of what is needed or how to get started. If you are a regular app builder, then you can bypass it or have the ability to turn it off in the app settings.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I picked Quickbase before investigating the low-code no-code market because I was so impressed. I did a pricing exercise a couple years ago because Quickbase was drastically increasing the cost and decreasing our allotments/features. We could have saved a lot of money by going with another comparable solution. However, those companies didn't have the longevity and all of the features and functions that Quickbase had.
Read full review
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Read full review
Scalability
While the purpose of this product is to provide flexibility and scalability to and organization, it is not as easy to roll out on the enterprise level. The support from Quick Base is not on a level that it makes the process easy and fluid. Be prepared to spend more time on this product than you might want to.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Quickbase has saved us so much time by reducing the clicks you need to get from one place to another. It takes the average colleague 5 or 6 clicks to get to another tool they need to do their job whereas it takes me 1 or 2 clicks to get to that same tool by using a personal Quickbase dashboard that has all the tools I need all on one page. This is a huge timesaver, especially when desk sharing where you have to get quickly to the info you want to share.
  • Quickbase has helped us streamline workflows and close gaps by having to ask for info only 1 time. Since users can't save a form until they've provided all the info you need on your end to complete a task, it saves a tremendous amount of time for everyone. No more replying to emails 2 or 3 times until you get the info you need.
Read full review
  • The subscription expense and IT overhead has been substantial. That being said at the time of implementation, most other competing platforms were in line with their pricing.
  • As more competitive alternatives have come to market we would have probably gone with an entirely cloud base alternative at a lower price.
  • We ended up with ClickUp as our primary project management platform. If our finance/accounting software wasn't already so integrated with Workamjig we would probably switch to it entirely.
Read full review
ScreenShots