TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Webexpenses

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWebexpenses is a global provider of spend management solutions, combining integrated Expense Cards with cloud-based software for businesses of all sizes across 70+ countries. Serving industries such as retail, finance, technology, construction, and not-for-profit, Webexpenses gives businesses control over company spending by automating processes, proactively enforcing policies, and controlling costs. Features The Webexpenses platform includes both desktop…

    $10.13

    per month per user

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
    Pricing
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Editions & Modules
    Essential
    $10.13
    per month per user
    Scale
    $12.15
    per month per user
    Pro
    $18
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup Fee$250 one-time fee per installationNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThese USD amounts are approximate and provided for guidance only. As exchange rates fluctuate daily with market movements, the actual USD equivalent will vary over time and may differ at the point of transaction or when a formal USD price list is established.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Considered Both Products
    Webexpenses
    No answer on this topic
    Zip
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    650 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    344 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    675 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    215 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    240 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Expense Management
    Comparison of Expense Management features of Webexpenses and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Webexpenses
    8.5
    161 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Employee Expense Reporting8.7161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Corporate Card Reconciliation8.274 Ratings00 Ratings
    Payment Management
    Comparison of Payment Management features of Webexpenses and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Webexpenses
    8.4
    150 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Customizable Approval Policies8.4112 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Document Management7.737 Ratings00 Ratings
    Payment Status Tracking8.9140 Ratings00 Ratings
    Payment Audit Trail8.9114 Ratings00 Ratings
    Duplicate Bill Detection8.038 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced OCR7.825 Ratings00 Ratings
    Electronic Funds Transfer8.883 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Small Businesses
    Brex
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Expensify
    Score9 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (824 ratings)
    7.7
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.4
    (50 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (824 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.8
    (11 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.9
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.5
    (377 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.6
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    9.8
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.6
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.2
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.8
    (11 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    WebexpensesZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Webexpenses
    Webexpenses is well suited for payroll to easily track workforce expenses and reducing hours of manual work from approving and processing the submitted claims. I have to highlight the automated custom report generating, which suits any needs to see reports for our teams. At our organization there is no sceniario, where Webexpenses would be less appropriate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Webexpenses
    • imports credit card transactions from our corporate card program without issue
    • allows for easy set up of new users
    • is a very intuitive, easy to learn tool
    • has a very responsive support and customer service team
    • Set up and configuration was thorough, and they were able to work through our unique issues, such as custom segments in NetSuite.
    • It is a very inexpensive product. Well worth the cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
    • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
    • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
    • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
    Read full review
    Cons
    Webexpenses
    • Would be nice if claims could be organised into certain chronological orders i.e. ordered by date so I don't have to copy and delete claims when adding a claim in that has an earlier date
    • Would be ideal to have an option to save full routes rather than just addresses maybe?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
    • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
    • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Webexpenses
    There doesn't seem to be anything in the market at the same price point that is better, however if there is an interrupter in the market that provides better value, then we would heavily assess the cost of change to see if we should move on to the alternative offering.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Webexpenses
    I think this is an easy to use and effective system for expense management. I like how I can upload images and documents directly from my phone onto the mobile app. It's beneficial for continuity that the app and the web browser work the same, and I can save claims to come back to later if I wish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Webexpenses
    The soft ware is reliable. The phone app works well and allows you to upload evidence, receipts, log mileage and log expenses. It works well and is rarely locked or there are very few times the app is down. The laptop based software is easy to access and again is always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Webexpenses
    The phone based app and the laptop based app always load quickly. It is easy to access. It is quick to use. It easy and quick to upload information and evidence. It is easy to log details. The information goes off to accounting and payroll quickly resulting in prompt payments for staff
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Webexpenses
    The support for the initial setup was great, but since then we have only had to contact support once when we had problems uploading credit card files. The help we received at this time was not good and we ended up trying various things until we resolved the problem ourselves. The online support tutorials are good, but searching for a specific issue is difficult.
    Read full review
    Zip
    Incredibly responsive and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Webexpenses
    All went well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Webexpenses
    It was difficult to train multiple people via video, as they learned at different speeds, and most of the user champions were not as capable with systems and finance processes as our dept.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Webexpenses
    As long as you have people that are fully aware of the setup steps to get users into the software then I would see no issues arising for any company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Webexpenses
    I would have to say that Webexpenses does not stack up well in comparison to Expensify. If given a choice, I would choose Expensify for the best user experience and mobile / desktop being more seamless. It accomplishes the same thing but has a more modern, minimal, and streamlined feel to it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Webexpenses
    Every department in my organization uses webexpenses. My role and the role of others involves travel, expenses and mileage. Everyone uses the app to log details, upload receipts and to claim allowable expenses. having spoken to everyone within my team and wider directorate, i do not know of anyone who has had issues with the app
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Webexpenses
    • Easy integration with your existing finance / accounting software.
    • Lot of time is being saved in maintaining records and now going completely online.
    • Love the option of Scan receipts with Google-vision-powered optical character. This also resulted in less use of paper in our office.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
    • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
    • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Webexpenses Screenshots

    Screenshot of the Webexpenses mobile app, that captures receipts instantly.Screenshot of Webexpenses, accessed through a desktop, iOS, Android or Windows device.Screenshot of mileage tracking with Webexpenses.Screenshot of a display of expense-related spend, reported and tracked with customisable reports.Screenshot of the mobile app, where users' expenses can be built, submitted and approved.Screenshot of Webexpenses payments and expense reimbursements.

    Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.