GreenhousePricing

the basic job right and never disappoints its users. If you are looking for cost effective enterprise solution for all your recruiting needs, this is the

Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market. This is an overall package for all your recruitment, Engagement

interview notes, and rate candidates. Before interviews, we were assigned core values in Greenhouse to ask in the interviews, so that we did not overlap or miss

Greenhouse is the standard, it is the most expensive but it's worth it. If you wanted to spend less, I'd suggest Lever but that

hiring activities Increased company engagement Probably decreased hiring cost since dont use agencies any more

Streamlined the hiring process and new hire time to value Increased satisfaction for hiring managers and sales account managers Allowed

Reporting Added features with no cost

of the hiring demands that a scaling company has. Moreover, the company values inclusion and diversity, and fair hiring practices, which Greenhouse aims

COST ACCESS LANGUAGES

Greenhouse has a very reasonable price for various organization sizes. It's intuitive to use and provides decent

Data reporting on Job Stage Changes. Fresher look on the backend. Price is pretty high. … Greenhouse was slightly more expensive, but the recruiting team really liked the ability to capture a resume via

Price Product Features Product Usability

or Google Calendar for scheduling interviews Pricing is on the higher side, which can prove very expensive for smaller companies … next rounds faster The referral hires ratio has increased, which mean less cost to the company and more engaged employees Overall turnaround time…

back end data sources for reporting should have a function to tell expected value of pipeline based on funnel metrics

Once they deviate, everything becomes messy and is traceable for reporting pricing purposes. Integrations with other tools like a doc you sign or causality … Price Product Features

According to the pricing and on a team review we get to know that the teams are more compatible and

I do think that Greenhouse could be a little more thoughtful in their pricing and packaging - in order to really get the most out of the functionality

It is the most innovative and effective, but it is still competitively priced. It is not clunky and hard to use like an Icims, and it has way more features

directly related to the actual recruiting process, your pricing can get outsized relative to the value it generates for you pretty quickly. … team-oriented interviewing, it might not be appropriate. Because Greenhouse charges based on your company's size, and not on the number…

It has clearly lowered our cost to hire It has provided consistency to the recruitment process

with Greenhouse. I have heard Greenhouse is more expensive than others and some companies get priced out. When I recommend Greenhouse to people, sometimes … sometimes they say "I wish, but it's too expensive!"

option but also the youngest (so less feature-rich). Lever was similarly priced and had much more intuitive workflows. The tipping point to go with Greenhouse

from our HR department that it's somewhat pricy and not an especially affordable tool. A nice-to-have: the ability to log in and check the status of your … post-interview in a fair way. The only thing I can think of is that Greenhouse isn't cheap, especially as you add more…

I am unsure of the cost of Greenhouse but it has been a key tool for recruiting.