Greenhouse Pricing

“Greenhouse is expensive, and there are basic functions that cost extra. … The price is not commensurate with the value.”

“Increased ROI by having to spend less time as interviewers as well less time for HR to manage the interview process Increased ROI because it is cloud-based, so easy to access from anywhere.”

“Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market.”

“Being able to customize (with budget available) to have funnel reporting to meet anti-racist hiring goals has a huge impact and ROI. … I do think that Greenhouse could be a little more thoughtful in their pricing and packaging - in order to really get the most out of the functionality for specifically depth of candidate reporting it...”

“For smaller companies where there may only be one or 2 openings at a time, the cost of the software may be a little too high to justify a good ROI, but if you are looking to scale, then this is the...”

“Because Greenhouse charges based on your company's size, and not on the number of jobs filled, recruiter seats, or other units more directly related to the actual recruiting process, your pricing can...”

“The only thing I can think of is that Greenhouse isn't cheap, especially as you add more users, so perhaps organizations on a budget would look for alternatives.”

“This infrastructure gives us a path to move away from third party recruiters and more towards organic, and inbound candidates through less expensive channels.”

“If you are looking for cost effective enterprise solution for all your recruiting needs, this is the best solution.”

“Worth the investment, but could be better.”

“We just upgraded GH to the highest tier, before we upgrade I would give it a 6 or 7, but after the upgrade, the highest tier features are very lack luster and needs big improvements.”