Miro use for Architecture
September 20, 2024
Miro use for Architecture

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We previously used Miro but at the moment we use concept board. I do still use Miro personally. We share ideas, keep project boards with plans, photos and notes.
Pros
- Easy to align objects and create good looking boards
- Easy to add notes
- Easy to make diagrams with connection points
- Mostly fast loading times, even when using large images
Cons
- The leaders from different notes are confusing and not intuitive
- It is a fairly low cost investment for companies
- It was helpful for collaborating online during the pandemic, and has continued to be a good resource to collaborate across offices and even with clients and consultants.
- Difficult to say exactly what impact this particular tool has had.
This is exactly why these boards are helpful. It also helps collaboration while traveling or out of the office, where you can quickly add notes on you mobile device or even photos, images sketches and other documentation and thoughts.
We are currently using Conceptboard as our primary board platform. It can be confusing with so many different platforms and for the team to know where things are saved and documented. We still want to keep copies or final versions of our documents on our own servers.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation