Whoever has Miro has everything
April 16, 2025

Whoever has Miro has everything

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We use Miro mainly to conduct co-creation activities with our clients, in addition to documenting the progress of these projects. We also use it in internal team activities, such as retrospectives, brainstorms and team management. As we are a company that works remotely, we have Miro as an important basis for our day-to-day operations in various tasks, but I would say that these are the main ones.

Pros

  • Conducting co-creation workshops
  • Project documentation
  • Team and general information management
  • Vision of projects for customers and PMO

Cons

  • The application could be lighter in general, it consumes a lot of computational resources
  • Sharing links can be made easier, without inducing users to register on the platform
  • Exporting could also be an easier process
  • The negative impact would be the value of the tool, which is still high, although I think it will pay for itself within our projects
  • It's a great tool for integrating distant teams, and this impacts our culture and the way we do things, even remotely
  • Thinking about team management and productivity, as it is a popular and easy-to-use tool, it certainly makes our employees' lives easier and, consequently, productive.
It is an easy tool to implement and has a very short learning curve for people who already deal with similar software. In our company, professionals from all areas interact with us through Miro and use boards in their workflows, so I believe it is easy to implement and be used by any team.
At the beginning of the pandemic period, in 2020, we still worked in the traditional format, and migrating to remote work was impactful at first, and honestly, I don't know what we would do without Miro. It was a fundamental tool during that period, allowing us all to have a single view of projects remotely, something unthinkable until then. As we continue to work remotely, boards continue to have an important presence in our projects.
Again, Miro was the most prominent tool on the market back in 2020, and this ease and established learnability makes us continue to use Miro. However, we have already had experience with Mural in interactions with our customers and I can say that Miro is much more versatile and convenient, especially with usability in mind. We've also used FigJam, which is a good tool, but you still need to walk a bit to get closer to Miro. Other tools have a more specific context of use, so they cannot completely replace what we do in Miro.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Excellent for carrying out tasks and ideations in groups online, including design processes, systems architecture, UML diagrams, project documentation in important visions for the client and even, in some cases, managing a team's own activities, for example. And it is not so good for prototyping applications and any delivery that requires greater fidelity.

Excelente para a realização de tarefas e ideações em grupo online, incluindo processos de design, arquitetura de sistemas, diagramas UML, documentação de projetos em visões importantes para o cliente e até, em alguns casos, gerenciamento de atividades próprias de uma equipe, por exemplo. E não é tão bom para aplicativos de prototipagem e qualquer entrega que exija maior fidelidade.

Parts of this review were originally written in Portuguese and have been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.

Comments

More Reviews of Miro

  1. Home
  2. Visual Collaboration Software
  3. Miro Reviews
  4. User Review of Miro