a program for beginner experimentation, all the way to a mature testing & personalization program
Updated November 20, 2024
a program for beginner experimentation, all the way to a mature testing & personalization program

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Optimizely Web Experimentation
We use Optimizely Web Experimentation for content testing (images and/or copy), recommendation algorithm tests for product carousels, and feature testing (net new features that we develop and want to validate & calculate revenue incrementality before launching). With the first two: we want to test along the customer journey to understand what pieces of content or product assortments provide the best benefit to her on site. We also use audience segmenting to be able to target the right users (coming from X marketing channel, mobile-only users, or logged-in users) to be able to refine our testing.
Pros
- Extensions - allows the company to tailor the tool to unlock certain capabilities
- Developer-friendly, with GA and other integrations
- Intuitive results page that can be shared out
Cons
- Hard to use extensions without some knowledge of HTML/CSS
- Inconsistent user counts between GA & Optimizely when it comes to calculating MAUs, hard to be able to forecast budget and overages when our source of truth (GA) differs from our testing platform (Optimizely)
- Impressions model doesn't support scaling personalization experiences - hard to run a serious data driven testing program when you have to cut tests short before 14 days (ideal length to get to any statistical read) in order to save on impressions
- Validated business case for going into new testing approach
- Increased conversions from certain audiences by running and launching successful experiences tailored to those users
For launch and analysis: it is so helpful for us to only look at one report to see key test results. For targeted experiences: if we're testing on Paid Search audiences, and if we want to launch that experience at 100%, it is much easier for us to scale that experience out.
We use AEM so Adobe Target would be a natural choice, it integrates naturally with the Experience Fragments and all the content we already hold there. However - with extensions - we've been able to unlock a similar workflow to be able to seamlessly test. Optimizely has the unique capability to be able to feature test, which is how we have been able to evolve our onsite experience and not only be able to quantify the revenue impact of our content or copy changes, but of entire site changes.
Do you think Optimizely Web Experimentation delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Optimizely Web Experimentation's feature set?
Yes
Did Optimizely Web Experimentation live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Optimizely Web Experimentation go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Optimizely Web Experimentation again?
Yes
Optimizely Web Experimentation Feature Ratings
Using Optimizely Web Experimentation
10 - product management, site experience, CRM
2 - we have a product manager and a web experimentation lead for optimizely web experimentation. the product manager helps develop additional areas for the web experimentation lead to run testing on. web experimentation lead is not technical and deploys content, recommendation strategy, and copy or linking tests as part of the testing program.
- testing feature changes before we roll out code
- testing copy or content changes to inform promotions or site design
- test and then deliver targeted recommendation strategies to certain audiences
- tested hiding links in our navigation, resulted in a +1% improvement in conversion rate
- deploy custom landing pages for certain incoming channels (using optimizely, add/swap/remove content) for a personalized experience
Using Optimizely Web Experimentation
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
None | None |
- redirect tests
- change text in page

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation