PTO tracking doesn't work.
October 30, 2012
PTO tracking doesn't work.
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Software Version
Workplace
Overall Satisfaction
Pros
- Reporting is really good – you can create reports more easily than through ADP.
- Nice that it is one system of record and SAAS so we can look real time at what HR is doing.
- Employees can do own W-4 and direct deposit changes online.
Cons
- PTO tracking does not work at all. Employees can submit time and managers can approve time off, but it does not deduct time from a person’s balance. Also at end of year, it didn’t update people’s balances. It seems like a fairly simple thing to make work. Time tracking is tied to pay and not separable.
- We have to do all the set-up. We have to add new codes – other providers will do the set-up for you.
- We are system admins. Through ADP if you want a new code for stock options, you could submit a case to ADP and they would add it and set-up the tax categories correctly so everything gets reported correctly. With Ultimate we have to do that ourselves and it’s sometimes hard to know what tax category something has to be in. There are 100s of tax categories, and it’s hard to know which one to choose – there’s no explanation. You still end up having to call them.
- We also have issues with things not working.
- Everything is in one system. Employees have one logon to see everything.
- The fact that we can see things real time is beneficial to us.
- Approval flows through system for vacation, address changes etc.
- For payroll, it’s actually now more difficult. When reporting on payroll for employee changes, it is hard to narrow down the changes you actually want to see.
Product Usage
400 - Whole company
No one from finance.
- HR – payroll
- Reporting – requires use of business intelligence platform, Cognos.
Evaluation and Selection
Our short list was Workday, Ultipro. The HR manager went through broader evaluation
The primary reasons why we chose Ultipro over Workday where that it seemed like it would work better/easier, and was more cost effective. We liked Workday, but it seemed more involved than what we needed. It had had a whole lot more modules that you could pull in. It was fairly easy to use, but the payroll process did not seem as intuitive as Ultipro. They took a few more steps.
The primary reasons why we chose Ultipro over Workday where that it seemed like it would work better/easier, and was more cost effective. We liked Workday, but it seemed more involved than what we needed. It had had a whole lot more modules that you could pull in. It was fairly easy to use, but the payroll process did not seem as intuitive as Ultipro. They took a few more steps.
Implementation
- Vendor implemented
- Implemented in-house
Training
- Online training
Support
Usability
Reliability
Integration
- Mass Mutual for 401k
We attempted to integrate with Mass Mutual for 401k. After every payroll it should send off the files, but it just has never worked. We have been on many calls with both companies to resolve and have just given up.
We were supposed to have integrations with healthcare providers but I don’t think they are working yet either. The GL integration (to Netsuite) was supposed to occur but that hasn’t happened. Getting people to help from Ultimate with these projects is like pulling teeth. We had 4 integrations included in our contract.
We were supposed to have integrations with healthcare providers but I don’t think they are working yet either. The GL integration (to Netsuite) was supposed to occur but that hasn’t happened. Getting people to help from Ultimate with these projects is like pulling teeth. We had 4 integrations included in our contract.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation