Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
Wrike was our first project management tool that was implemented in our marketing department. For quite some time, we used it as a housing and archive structure for different marketing projects. Eventually, it evolved, and we started utilizing the Wrike dashboard to run our weekly pipeline meetings. This was great because we could easily see what was overdue, what was in progress, and what was coming down the pipeline in the upcoming weeks as well. Wrike made almost everything customizable, which was great. If you have someone who really knows the system inside and out, it really helps in how a user actually handles working within the system. Dashboards were created automatically if the settings were right. The only downside I'd have to say is that not all things are done by a trigger and would have to be done manually. For instance, if a project or task were "completed," it wouldn't automatically move to our archive folder or out of our dashboard.
- Dashboard integration
- Wrike Editor for graphics & video
- Communication within platform
- Automation of organization
- Bug fixes and performance
- Complicated folder structures for new users
- Communication
- Process flow
- Editing
- Timelines on projects
- Organization
- Higher producing content
Wrike was the one that seemed to have the most organizational structure, but we could also customize and configure the way we wanted to. It also seemed to be the most user-friendly for people of all tech backgrounds and knowledge. It was almost like working organizationally through a social media account.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes