TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    3CX

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/ACyprus based company 3CX offers an IP PBX phone system.

    $1.08

    per user/per month

    Microsoft Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Natterbox

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ANatterbox is a voice solution that's embedded and managed inside Salesforce, helping Salesforce-first companies to personalize their caller journeys for improved customer experience and boost productivity for their sales and service teams. Natterbox enables users to create and manage a business phone system and contact center globally, inside the Salesforce CRM. It comes with key CTI and contact center features including IVR, ACD, click-to-dial, call…

    $52

    per month per user

    Pricing
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Editions & Modules
    Pro
    $1.08
    per user/per month
    Enterprise
    $1.31
    per user/per month
    Standard
    Free
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Pro
    $52
    per month per user
    Premium
    $91
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Free Trial
    YesYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPrice displayed is based on 25 users. 3CX pricing is based on the number of simultaneous calls your business requires or in other words, how many calls your system needs to support at once. Unlike other PBX vendors there is no per extension cost.Discounts are available for non profit organizations.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Considered Multiple Products
    3CX
    Chose 3CX
    3cx is better cause it also offers chat and call recordings. I don't think Podium does that.
    Incentivized
    Chose 3CX
    These are not dedicated IP phone systems but they are the close I've used. Our old legacy phone system wasn't cutting it anymore. I would say our biggest hurdle for out-groups has been able to get the old legacy fax services working for 3CX and I'm not sure if it even does. …
    Incentivized
    Chose 3CX
    We didn't want Cisco Call Manager anymore. We used a very old version previously, but nonetheless it didn't have a very good name in the company. PureCloud was too call center focused so in the end, we like 3CX best. A small pilot was configured very fast, and after we went …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Natterbox
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    90%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    225 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    174 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    241 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Natterbox
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management00 Ratings8.1179 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.196 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.3208 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.4126 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings8.2229 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings7.6212 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings8.4143 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.0
    251 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Natterbox
    -
    Ratings
    Chat00 Ratings9.0250 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings8.5249 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings8.7235 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings8.6157 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    236 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Natterbox
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning00 Ratings8.6168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings8.4202 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings8.8200 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings8.9216 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings8.6198 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings8.5158 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync00 Ratings8.6172 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cloud PBX
    Comparison of Cloud PBX features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Natterbox
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Hosted PBX00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Call reports00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Directory of employee names00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Call Management
    Comparison of Call Management features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Natterbox
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Answering rules00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Call recording00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Message alerts00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Mobile apps
    Comparison of Mobile apps features of 3CX and Microsoft Teams and Natterbox
    Feature
    3CX
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    -
    Ratings
    Natterbox
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Mobile app for iOS00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Mobile app for Android00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Small Businesses
    Sangoma Asterisk
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    CallFire
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sangoma Asterisk
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Fuze
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Sangoma Asterisk
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (14 ratings)
    8.6
    (329 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (114 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.4
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (114 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    3CXMicrosoft TeamsNatterbox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    3CX
    In many scenarios decision is driven by budget and compared to other solutions at the time of purchase [3CX] was simply the cheapest solution for what it has to offer. If you are looking for integrations, extensibility, and advanced functionalities, this might not be a solution for you. At the time of use (and this may have changed by now), there was a lack of APIs, CLI commands, and similar so nothing could be automated with the system. There are ways of importing data through CSV but automation would solve us so much time and support calls if we were able to connect with other systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    It is an awesome tool for companies that have a hybrid or even fully remote setup and where the integration with Salesforce is needed. The solution completely replaces old phone systems and adds another layer of data to Salesforce, to give an even better view of the interaction with clients, adding automatically events/activities which can in turn be used to reporting purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    3CX
    • Simplicity: Using a single 3CX interface we can manage every phone and extension used throughout our company.
    • Flexibility: There are a wide variety of options to configure each extension and phone. Changing anything after the hardware is deployed is very easy.
    • Portability: Phones with 3CX can be easily moved or repurposed within an office or at remote locations, including users' homes. The mobile app allows users to use their office extension anywhere without exposing their cell number.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • All in one communication for Teams.
    • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
    • Well organized and clear instant chat.
    • Excellent security features.
    • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
    • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
    • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    • Great Interface
    • Friendly Admin backend
    • Great integration with Salesforce
    • Support responsive and actively working to solve issues
    • Customer Manager accessible
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    3CX
    • I would like to be able to see direct-dial numbers on the handsets. Currently that is not possible but that would be a nice feature.
    • You need an SBC per location, which can be a point of failure.
    • You also need a server that might get disconnected, which is another point of failure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
    • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
    • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    • For our use case, Natterbox fits all checkboxes, we're now starting to investigate the use of their AI, but that's in very early stage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    We use the Natterbox CTI interface, seating on top of and integrated with Salesforce. The interface is minimalist, popping up as the calls arrive and bringing the Caller's details if they exist in Salesforce. The user then have the possibility to open the Caller's record and visualise the details and add notes, or make the notes in the pop-up window which will end up in the contact's record activity. Very easy to use. The routing queue interface is also very user friendly with drag and drop items that make it visually easy to read and understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    3CX
    The 3CX Phone System is only a five because while they provide set-up/how-to/Q and A documents to help your district or company get started, they do not offer support for free. The documents provided, though, are good enough for you to get you up and running. We also found a good source of help through a sip trunk provider, which was a 3CX reseller provider.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    3CX
    The main differences between 8x8, Inc. and 3CX is pricing and ease of use in my opinion. The 3CX system uses annual based pricing plans based on of simultaneous calls your company needs, not the number of extensions/users and offers a free plan. 8x8, Inc. charges per extension with different plans. We currently have 19 extensions so the 3CX system makes more sense for us, however, if your company only has a few extensions you may want to throughly consider both options. In my experience, it was difficult to add new extensions and phones with 8x8 because at least at that time we had 8x8 I could not add anything on the web admin. I had to call a sales rep which took a lot more time. Also, if you didn't purchase a phone and/or headset directly from 8x8 at a usually higher price than Amazon for example then you would have to spend anywhere from 30 minutes to hours on the phone with 8x8 tech support to program the phone to work with the 8x8 system so adding a new extension could turn into a long ordeal. I can easily add new extensions on 3CX directly in the web cpanel. Granted, if you are actually adding a new phone number you would need to purchase that number from a company like ATT first before adding it to 3CX. The difference between a phone number and an extension would be a phone number allows a customer to call in directly using that number. The extension would require the customer to call the main business number then be transferred to the extension. 3CX provides a list of supported phone models on their website
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    When signing up with Natterbox, our first goal was to replace the landline phone system as Covid hit and people moved to remote work. Second goal was to have a system that would integrate with Salesforce and provide an interface that would be easy to work with and learn for all levels of tech expertise. Those two goals were only achieved by Natterbox, by far.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    3CX
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    3CX
    • 3CX has a lot to offer for a very low cost as its business model is based on simultaneous calls and not per device. It's very cost effective and very affordable.
    • As the 3CX server does not require a high-performance server to run, with the Public Cloud option, it might allow even further savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
    • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
    • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Natterbox
    • It doesn't matter where anyone is physically located now, everyone can have their calls delivered to their mobile or laptop and answer them.
    • We now have internally the capacity to manage our call queues.
    • We now have a lot of data to report on, either grouping the calls by Campaign on Salesforce, or grouping them by Inbound or Outbound calls, or by User, or by Team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    3CX Screenshots

    Screenshot of Video ConferencingScreenshot of Advanced Contact Center ReportingScreenshot of Management DashboardScreenshot of Live ChatScreenshot of 3CX AppScreenshot of See the Status of Your Colleagues