Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveCollab
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Active Collab is a project management solution built around features such as task management, collaboration, time tracking, and invoicing.
$8
per member/per month
Kanbanchi for G Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Kanbanchi is a project management solution built as a web-based deployment through Google Drive.
$7.95
per user
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$0
per month per user
Pricing
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Editions & Modules
ActiveCollab Project Management
$8
per member/per month
Self-Hosted Plan
$999.00
license
Starter
$7.95
per user
Professional
$19.97
per user
Enterprise
custom
per user
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$6.25 per member, per month, annual billingNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Considered Multiple Products
ActiveCollab
Chose ActiveCollab
Unfortunately, I find that every single one of these alternatives is a better tool. ActiveCollab is a legacy tool my organisation had in place when I joined because their team had been much smaller and had less need for collaborative views and workload management within a tool …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has similar features to Basecamp for both project management and communication purposes. However, Basecamp has a better interface for organization of projects within clients and allows for linking to specific comments. However, ActiveCollab is more affordable than …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab is easier to use and simpler in its setup. It has the right mix of features and simplicity. It's also project-oriented which is important for our workflow. Other tools are often too task-oriented, making it hard to track projects. Overall, ActiveCollab has a great …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has fewer functions than Wrike and a simpler interface, but generally, the team collaboration purpose is fulfilled.
Chose ActiveCollab
I have used multiple project management platforms such as ActiveCollab, Jira, Trello, etc. Trello has great visualization with their (Kanban Board) board system and support drag and drop functionality for managing tasks. ActiveCollab, however, does not have the fancy …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab is 100% better than any of the other tools we have used. We had previously spent thousands of dollars trying out different software that was comparable, but this has been one of the best decisions we have made as a company. It's also the cheapest ongoing option, …
Chose ActiveCollab
Certainly, each of them has a particular advantage, which in the end makes it unique. ActiveCollab also belongs to a group of platforms created to be represented in particular, its way of project management is superior to Jira or Trello. With this software, the work is more …
Since we moved from fixed capacity project to T&M we need some tool who support our billing & invoicing.
HP ALM did not provide good support for invoicing so we moved out from HP ALM to ActiveCollab.
The features like Timer, reminders are not available in other project management …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has all the functions that are in these services, unlike them. Not everywhere there is a diagram of gantt. And somewhere the interface is very rewarded and in general looks obsolete.
Chose ActiveCollab
We chose Active Collab overall because we liked its easy to use user interface, project management suite and agency/vendor/client interaction capabilities. We also chose it primarily because it was offered as a web-based platform that offered very clean and easy mobile access …
Chose ActiveCollab
We chose Active Collab over Basecamp as the pricing model worked better for us. Basecamp, for us was a close second.
Kanbanchi for G Suite
Chose Kanbanchi for G Suite
We have used MS Project previously but ended up doing things in spreadsheets so KanBanchi has bridged this gap for us
Wrike
Chose Wrike
Asana provides user friendly interface and suitable platform for software engineering teams. But Wrike stood out because it provides good balance of project planning, workflow automation and dashboard functionalities in a single place.
Chose Wrike
Wrike was better in terms of task layout and project setup/organization.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is much simpler to use and customize.
Chose Wrike
Wrike has a broader application than task management apps like Toggl or Todoist. I do use Toggl as a basic time tracking software, however Wrike covers more ground. It is robust and user-friendly, and much less expensive than MS Project.
Chose Wrike
We used RoboHead prior to Wrike for document control and project management. Wrike is by far more advanced and interactive. It gives us so many more opportunities for communication.
Chose Wrike
Wrike's UI, combined with its low-cost solutions, has been the standout factor compared to the other options sought. They have multiple license types suited to different usage, a standout compared to others that don't leave you stuck paying high license fees for licenses you …
Chose Wrike
I utilized basecamp at my last position and I just remember it was extremely limited in what you could do. If I remember correctly there was no workflow integration of the platform, it was essentially just an app that you could create folders in that housed all of the files. No …
Chose Wrike
Cost and functionality. We were able to gain consensus on Wrike across numerous stakeholders. It may not be the best at everything but it's capable at a wide range of things.
Chose Wrike
Wrike was more capable that ProWorkflow (at least when we compared them several years ago) and more team/smaller workflow real time oriented than MS Project - where Project is better for detailed PM work. ClickUp is far more flexible and better value for a similar price at the …
Chose Wrike
our past products have been so hard to customize, streamline, and make work for all types of roles in the company. i feel like wrike is a great fit for everyone to work together well.
Chose Wrike
I don't have experience looking into other similar products.
Chose Wrike
Honestly for me, it depends what you’re utilizing these tools for. In my experience, some of the other project management tools I’ve used the past such as Jira are way too complex for the use case we run into with our business. I feel like the overall goal of Wrike is to …
Chose Wrike
I think Wrike is very similar to other project management platforms such as Monday, Asana and Teamwork that I have used before. As they all provide strong tools for task and project organization, one feature particularly liked by me in TW was its time-tracking functionality, …
Chose Wrike
I've used Airtable for my other marketing job and for other organizational work, but I like how much you can get out of Wrike.
Chose Wrike
I only used Asana pretty briefly, but my recollection is that it was a lot more rigid compared to Wrike.
Chose Wrike
Monday wasn't as customizable as Wrike. Basecamp is great for tracking simple tasks and communicating with outside agencies, but isn't complex enough to track projects. Smartsheet is basically a fancy spreadsheet.
Chose Wrike
We have been using Wrike for over seven years, so I don't recall the specific reason why we chose it over Asana. I recall that the functions were similar, but I think we found that Wrike offered flexibility and structure that we felt would function the best for our department.
Chose Wrike
It wasn't my choice but I do feel like there are more options within Wrike
Chose Wrike
Todoist is great for a personal task manager. However, it can not track time like you can in Wrike. Todoist also continues to rise in cost.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is more robust and suited for enterprise teams. Learning curve is more difficult and involved. Other platforms you can learn in a day or two. Wrike takes a month or two to get the hang of
Chose Wrike
Monday is a easier for project management and task tracking. Where Wrike excels is with the ticketing system for our IT, legal, or other specific teams.
Chose Wrike
Slack has more options for project management than slack. Airtable is more of a events overall CRM than project managements
Features
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
3.6
Ratings
73% below category average
Kanbanchi for G Suite
7.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Wrike
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management5.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Resource Management1.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Gantt Charts3.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Scheduling1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Team Collaboration6.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Document Management3.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Email integration4.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Mobile Access1.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking2.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Change request and Case Management1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management2.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
5.7
Ratings
30% below category average
Kanbanchi for G Suite
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Wrike
7.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Quotes/estimates6.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Invoicing6.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Project & financial reporting1.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Integration with accounting software7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
1.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveCollabKanbanchi for G SuiteWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Active Collab is great for small teams who want a web-based project management platform to help them on their day-to-day workflow tasks, billing, estimations, vendor assignments and even client communications. It is also great for agencies with users who are sometimes remotely working. Active Collab starts to show shortcomings when you have an immense amount of projects in the system (1000+), and, being a web-based platform, can sometimes experience downtime.
Read full review
  • If you need transparency around your workloads the product is great as it is easy to use and visually tells a story.
  • It is ideal for SCRUM management as it plays into the ideas of Sprint
Read full review
I believe it's well suited if you have multiple jobs/projects that you need to keep organized. We work with multiple job types from print/creative to web, copy and digital ads so it helps us stay organized. I don't think it would be suitable for a company that doesn't have a lot of jobs to manage. We average over 1,200 requests a year.
Read full review
Pros
  • Project Management - Makes it very efficient to manage projects using Gantt Charts, daily email reports and custom reports!
  • Collaboration - Allows to collaborate with team members, tag them in tasks, send files/attachments.
  • Task delegation - With just 2 clicks you can delegate tasks to other team members/users.
Read full review
  • Great for supporting SCRUM as part of Agile deliveries. We use the ToDo, Doing and Done and build GANNT charts to facilitate resource planning.
  • We use it at a department level to manage workloads and help staff know what work is waiting for them and the relative priority.
  • We have deployed it across the organisation and also work with suppliers and offshore development teams to coordinate activities.
Read full review
  • Keeps projects on track
  • Provides tools that make editing and reviewing tasks much easier
  • Helps our team work effectively and efficiently despite many of us being remote workers
  • Visually accessible on multiple platforms which makes it easy to do work from anywhere
Read full review
Cons
  • It isn't possible to set members of staff as part time, so if someone is unavailable on certain days you must manually enter them as OOO every single day that they are not in, that other teammates work. Hours also can't be edited individually - everyone is treated as working the same hours in a day, rendering capacity planner useless for flexi working teams
  • Subtasks cannot be assigned their own hours and deadlines, meaning the To Do list view can't be seen in actual date order and capacity planner does not reflect all time allocated to an individual's schedule unless every task is set up as a separate task rather than subtask
  • There is no way to see all tasks of a certain type across multiple campaigns (e.g all copywriting tasks vs all technical tasks) - support team suggested exporting data and making spreadsheets
  • Kanban view isn't available for people's own task lists ('board' view here shows a list)
  • Not possible to have one task be assigned to more than one person
  • Notifications are not sent when tasks are updated, so you have to leave comments and tag people each time
Read full review
  • Occasionally hangs at login but this may be to do with our authentication service.
  • It would be nice when grouping cards together if there was an option to lay them over each other in a fan arrangement.
Read full review
  • Email alerts sometimes send too slowly.
  • If you put a project on hold, it can be hard to find it once you are ready to return to it.
  • Sometimes there are too many steps/tasks and the main page can get cluttered.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It does take some time and work to really understand and use it properly, but I think the accessibility to help and documentation make that completely feasible. Once you know how to use it, I find it to be very user-friendly, and have very few complaints.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team is responsive to requests and their annual support fees are reasonable. Honestly, we don't have to contact them much. Updates happen automatically and the platform is very solid and does not require a lot of support. Documentation is good and the platform is easy to learn.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Time and time again, Wrike has proved that they listen to their customers and put us first. From sales to support - they are quick to respond, encourcage community engagement and I never feel like i am callling a help center
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Since we moved from fixed capacity project to T&M we need some tool who support our billing & invoicing. HP ALM did not provide good support for invoicing so we moved out from HP ALM to ActiveCollab. The features like Timer, reminders are not available in other project management tools like JIRA, Rally & ALM making AC the first choice since we have strict SLA's & AC helps in meeting that.
Read full review
We have used MS Project previously but ended up doing things in spreadsheets so KanBanchi has bridged this gap for us
Read full review
Wrike's UI, combined with its low-cost solutions, has been the standout factor compared to the other options sought. They have multiple license types suited to different usage, a standout compared to others that don't leave you stuck paying high license fees for licenses you won't use to that extent.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
I’d go with a 9/10. It scales really well across teams and use cases, especially once you set things up properly. The only reason it’s not a full 10 is that it can take some effort to structure everything cleanly at the start.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • A central communication portal is used to keep all members of the team informed as to the status of specific projects. All staff have access to read past discussions to enable contribution to the current discussion.
  • We have found it difficult to get our clients to adopt usage of ActiveCollab for communication on a reliable basis.
  • The cost per person is high when using it as a communication center.
Read full review
  • We have seen great value in our planning for Agile deliveries especially when applying it to SCRUM.
  • Using the product we have found it quickly surfaces resource constraints and blockers when planning for projects.
Read full review
  • Allow us to plan, execute, track, and effortlessly achieve the completion of all projects before the deadline.
  • Great team collaboration that enhances team productivity and efficiency.
  • Provide real time project status and progress easily.
  • Projects stay well organized and assigning tasks to right people is simple.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ActiveCollab Screenshots

Screenshot of the dashboard with an overview of projects.Screenshot of multiple task views currently showing a Kanban view of the tasklists and tasks.Screenshot of Overview of all recent activity.Screenshot of Calendar view with task dependencies.Screenshot of Permission settings (owner, member, client, client+).Screenshot of List of available Add-ons.

Kanbanchi for G Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows