APS is a national workforce management and cloud-based HR solution provider. The platform includes core HR, payroll, time and attendance (including manager and employee self-service), compliance tools, and onboarding.
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, or Oracle Taleo, is a cloud HCM solution with Talent Management solutions. Its talent management solution includes Recruiting, Onboarding, Learning, Career Development, Opportunity Marketplace, Performance Management, Compensation, Succession Planning, etc.
$4
Per Employee Per Month
Pricing
APS
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Help Desk
$4.00
Per Employee Per Month
Talent Management
$10.00
Per Employee Per Month
Global HR
$15.00
Per Employee Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
APS
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Required
Additional Details
The Payroll solution is offered as a standalone service, but additional solutions must be used in conjunction with the Payroll solution.
Contact Oracle HCM for detailed pricing information at +1.800.392.2999
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
APS
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Features
APS
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
APS
9.1
34 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
119 Ratings
7% above category average
Pay calculation
10.033 Ratings
9.1106 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
8.013 Ratings
8.594 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
10.04 Ratings
8.332 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.023 Ratings
8.7108 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.033 Ratings
9.0100 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
8.725 Ratings
8.9109 Ratings
Reimbursement management
8.913 Ratings
8.291 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
176 Ratings
7% above category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.6165 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
9.1174 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.7167 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.9157 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
8.4159 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.8164 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
8.4124 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.9
122 Ratings
8% above category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.8118 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
8.9122 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.8114 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
156 Ratings
7% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
8.6135 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
8.9155 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
8.4115 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
9.0107 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.9152 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
70 Ratings
8% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.670 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
157 Ratings
14% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
9.0155 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.9152 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.2141 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
125 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
8.9122 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.7119 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.2
125 Ratings
2% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.6119 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.5121 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.4111 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.5124 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
138 Ratings
8% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.4136 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.5121 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
8.3131 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.4123 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
8.4120 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
APS
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.5
109 Ratings
9% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
8.499 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.5101 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.6105 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
8.5103 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
APS Payroll is an easy to use payroll system, and integrates well with some things such as the APS Hire feature, which handles onboarding, and the eSelfServe timeclock feature. It exports well to Quickbooks, but is only ok with NetSuite. (It works but is a completely manual process and takes a lot of setup.) Our tax registration and filing has been fine and we're always apprised of any tax discrepancies such as small Unemployment overages/underages when filed compared to what was withheld.
Oracle HCM is very much helpful and well suited in the recruitment and placement process and HR data. It makes it easier for HR in [organizations] to keep track of who is in and out of the [organization]. Improvement can be made by allowing employees to record their own data and update it as and when necessary without having to go through HR first.
It's fast and intuitive. Our previous contractors were ADP and Paychex and neither were intuitive. Our payroll runs have less errors now than with previous vendors. Payroll prep time is down from 5 hours with ADP to 2 hours with APS for the HR Manager.
The limiters are great. I'm always afraid of that error that no one caught. Let's assume that you add a $200 limiter to overtime. Any time that a staff member is about to receive more than $200 in overtime for that pay period, a red flag goes up for the HR manager to double check.
We have 3 programs in public schools that block certain ports. APS has a 2nd feature using GPS so that staff can only check in for their shift while they are in the designated GPS range. Great for someone who has to report to a remote location. Just add the GPS coordinates and they can't check until they get to the project.
Reporting - We have six different business units and the reporting is separate for all three. Most reporting I do requires information from all business units so am running six reports and then copying and pasting to get the report I need.
Multi-state taxes - We have a number of employees who live in New York and work in New Jersey. APS OnLine is designed to accommodate one state withholding so ability to have "worked in" state and "lived in" state taxes withheld went away. This was a shortfall.
The Carrier connection setup took much longer than expected. After a year, we are still having some issues with some items transferring over to the GL.
The CA overtime calculation does not calculate after 8 hours per day, only on the 40 per week so we override each week.
Reporting - when running Benefit reports, it recognizes employees who formerly carried the plan but may have dropped it. To get around this, we have to delete off the employee's record so the history is not readily available.
Government entities share data readily on applicants and HCM doesn't make it easy to have applications transferred between organizations. If applicants could apply once and send that application to multiple entities that would really make it more appealing to clients. This is a niche that is currently filled with NEOGOV, however Oracle's analytics are far superior to those in NEOGOV
There are no customizations allowed so clients need to work within the configuration standards or create a bolt on. Many times your greatest asset is also one of your biggest weaknesses.
Oracle is a large company and sometimes it can be hard to navigate the support matrix that they have set up. They also have tiers of support so you can pay more to get more, which isn't optimal from a customer point of view.
I have been using the system for over a year now and feel more comfortable with the functionality of it. I have just recently implemented the benefit administration portion.
Taleo does what we need it to do and based on the costs from both a time and money perspective, I don't see us changing anytime soon. If anything I think we will look to leverage the capabilities available that we may not already be using.
The APS Payroll software is very easy to use, and it is easy to train new employees on it. The APS Payroll support team is very helpful and response time is quick. It is easy to enter/change employee information, adjust salaries and benefits, etc. New features have also been added that makes it even better, such as being able to set up your own income/deduction items.
After the initial training's, it was quite intuitive to use the application. The application is based upon best practices and the overall flows are quite logical. The train stop approach also ensures that users understand where they are in the process cycle. Also, the number of clicks have been greatly rationalized to ensure that there is more streamlined experience.
It works well. However we recently discovered that it no longer is supported on Internet Explorer so we had to change the default browser for everyone in our organization to MS Edge.
I had to learn APS on my own, and the support team held my hand. They are still there when I have an occasional question. Anytime I need support, I can call my rep or send an email and help is on the way, without failure. The support team is awesome
The rating is based upon our current level of support. The overall experience has vastly changed since we moved into product paid support. 'Also, with Oracle going with the model of quarterly patches, it makes sense to have the product company provide support to the overall application thereby eliminating the problems of bugs.
It would have been helpful to understand the phases of the implementation up front so I could have prepared differently for enrollments, billing, and transfer of information to payroll. At the end of the day, I'm happy with the selection and the system and anticipate I will like it better as we go along. We have done a number of other system implementations in the past few years, and this has been pretty painless, however, I've had a few surprises.
There is a lot of potential on Fusion. We have reaped about 10% of potential benefits. Especially on Workforce Intelligence, the opportunities are huge. The reason why we do not use the solution at its full potential is not in the product (which is simple and transparent). A roadmap is under construction to bring more of its potential to the end user.
We had used ADP for years and had always struggled with their customer service. With over 20 locations (20+ W2s, quarterly filings, etc) we had a lot of questions. We would have to call and sit on hold for long periods of time to talk to someone who couldn't always answer our questions. Then we would get different answers from different people or have to re-explain our issue. It was a major time suck for my employees and they dreaded having to call all of the time. For us - the final straws for us to switch providers were: +Numerous year end filings with incorrect names and addresses (they couldn't keep our 20+ locations separate even though our paperwork was completed correctly) +Incorrect SUI rates for several locations that resulted in tens of thousands of dollars in overpayments which was a lot of money for small hotels. We had sent in numerous requests for them to fix this but it never happened +Lack of care - even though we were having all of these issues, nobody would work with us to get them all resolved and make sure to remedy the situation. We had to seek out a manager to get them resolved but even after this, we still had more issues. Overall - DON'T stick with ADP or even think about switching to them. They might be able to slash prices but their poor customer service and lack of care will cost you in the end. It's not worth it. APS does everything ADP had the capability of but we don't have the errors or headaches we did before. I am really looking forward to this year end!
Firstly, create a template for the data of human resources to be filled by the client with help from us, then We transformed the paperwork, excel, word sheets, did data cleansing and refined the data, and matched data with the correct fields inside the template and imported the data to oracle cloud hcm by using human capital management data loader
We were able to transition quickly and continue to successfully hire and onboard new hires for several Clubs that opened within weeks of moving to APS.
We do struggle a bit with the ease of reporting simply because our locations are all under separate EIN and that can make it difficult to easily combine data queried under custom reports, so the volume of reporting that I might wish to be able to push through weekly in order to help address 'real time' trends is not always available.
The lack of effective dating for position and wage changes does mean that HR and available APS data is not 'real time' accurate and that HR does need to return to the system to update changes well after-the-fact, which is not ideal.
We were not good at tracking any numbers around recruiting so now this last year we have been able to set the benchmark that we now can work toward improving.
At any given time, we could not say how many open positions we had. Now we are able to keep track of that.
We do a much better job with communicating with candidates now, especially the ones not selected. This will help us maintain a better reputation and attract the candidates back for other jobs they may be a better fit for in the future.